Literature DB >> 23038711

How likely is environmental or patient cross-contamination of Chlamydia trachomatis DNA to lead to false positive results in patients attending our clinic?

Sum Yee Chan1, Sophie Jose, Rebecca King, Mark R Pakianathan, Caroline Sabin, S Tariq Sadiq, Phillip E Hay, Tim Planche.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Environmental contamination with DNA from Chlamydia trachomatis (CT) has previously been found in Genitourinary Medicine (GUM) clinics. There are no known cases of cross-contamination of clinical samples and no known nosocomial infections. We investigated whether diagnostic samples could become contaminated from the environment by running dummy sample and carrying out a patient-throughput analysis. A total of 29 748 patients attended clinics over a year. Of these, 2860 (9.6%) had a positive Chlamydia test result.
METHOD: (1) A run of dummy samples (60 urine samples and 10 swabs) were processed as normal clinic specimens. (2) Patient-throughput analysis: Patient numbers attending the GUM clinic on a given day was categorised as low, moderate or high. χ(2) Tests were used to look for associations between categorical variables and Chlamydia test positivity. A Poisson regression model was fitted to look at the effect of the number of people in the clinic on the number of positive results in a given day. As some clinics were only run on certain days of the week, a sensitivity analysis was later performed with attendances at non-daily clinics removed.
RESULTS: All dummy samples tested negative and we did not find evidence of an association between daily Chlamydia positivity and clinic attendance.
CONCLUSIONS: It is unlikely that environmental or cross-contamination of CT has lead to significant numbers of false positive results. Laboratories check for possible cross-contamination routinely. The extension of this simple routine practice to all clinical areas could provide quality assurance, improving confidence in the results in clinics.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23038711     DOI: 10.1136/sextrans-2012-050667

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sex Transm Infect        ISSN: 1368-4973            Impact factor:   3.519


  3 in total

1.  Multisite Direct Determination of the Potential for Environmental Contamination of Urine Samples Used for Diagnosis of Sexually Transmitted Infections.

Authors:  Patiyan Andersson; Steven Y C Tong; Rachael A Lilliebridge; Nicole C Brenner; Louise M Martin; Emma Spencer; Jennifer Delima; Gurmeet Singh; Frances McCann; Carolyn Hudson; Tracy Johns; Philip M Giffard
Journal:  J Pediatric Infect Dis Soc       Date:  2013-12-19       Impact factor: 3.164

2.  Contaminated fingers: a potential cause of Chlamydia trachomatis-positive urine specimens.

Authors:  Philip M Giffard; Rachael A Lilliebridge; Judith Wilson; Gerald Murray; Samuel Phillips; Sepehr N Tabrizi; Suzanne M Garland; Louise Martin; Gurmeet Singh; Steven Y C Tong; Deborah C Holt; Patiyan Andersson
Journal:  Sex Transm Infect       Date:  2017-06-09       Impact factor: 3.519

3.  What is needed to guide testing for anorectal and pharyngeal Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae in women and men? Evidence and opinion.

Authors:  Nicole H T M Dukers-Muijrers; Julius Schachter; Genevieve A F S van Liere; Petra F G Wolffs; Christian J P A Hoebe
Journal:  BMC Infect Dis       Date:  2015-11-17       Impact factor: 3.090

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.