Literature DB >> 2303870

Posterolateral microdisectomy for cervical monoradiculopathy caused by posterolateral soft cervical disc sequestration.

F Aldrich1.   

Abstract

The controversy over whether to use a posterior or anterior approach for surgical treatment of soft cervical discs is still largely unsettled. However, although the posterior approach may be underutilized, it has distinct advantages when there are specific indications. Out of a large pool of cases, 53 patients presented with acute monoradiculopathy caused by soft cervical disc herniation. In 36 of these, the disc was sequestered (nonconfined) and was posterolateral to the disc space as seen on computerized tomography-myelography. Distinct motor weakness was a common clinical finding in all 36 cases. These patients were treated by using a 2- to 3-cm skin incision for the posterolateral microsurgical approach. The extent of the lateral facetectomy depended upon the relationship between the nerve root and the disc. All fragments were lateral to the dural sac and were sequestered through the anulus fibrosus and the posterior longitudinal ligament. Sequestrations were removed under direct microscopic vision, but the disc space was not entered. Pain relief and motor-power improvement in the affected radicular distribution were immediate in all patients. Sensory deficit and residual motor loss improved dramatically with normalization at approximately 6 months. No complications occurred and the mean hospital stay was 2 days. The follow-up period varied from 4 to 42 months with a mean of 26 months. Thus far, there have been no recurrences or other associated complications. By using strict selection criteria and a microsurgical posterolateral approach with removal of the sequestered disc fragment, excellent results with normalization of the monoradiculopathy can be obtained. The ease of this technique, low risk, minimal complications, and excellent results make it an attractive alternative to the anterior approach. The clinical presentations, specific indications, surgical technique, and clinical results are discussed; and a prototype of a small cervical self-retaining retractor is described.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2303870     DOI: 10.3171/jns.1990.72.3.0370

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosurg        ISSN: 0022-3085            Impact factor:   5.115


  15 in total

1.  Clinical applications of the tubular retractor on spinal disorders.

Authors:  Young Baeg Kim; Seung Jae Hyun
Journal:  J Korean Neurosurg Soc       Date:  2007-10-20

2.  Fragment excision versus conventional disc removal in the microsurgical treatment of herniated lumbar disc.

Authors:  K Faulhauer; C Manicke
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 2.216

3.  Posterior foraminotomy for lateral cervical disc herniation.

Authors:  C Mehren; L Wanke-Jellinek
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2019-01       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 4.  Management of cervical spondylotic myelopathy and radiculopathy.

Authors:  R Braakman
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  1994-03       Impact factor: 10.154

5.  Outcome of cervical radiculopathy treated with periradicular/epidural corticosteroid injections: a prospective study with independent clinical review.

Authors:  K Bush; S Hillier
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Bovine dowels for anterior cervical fusion: experience in 66 patients with a note on postoperative CT and MRI appearance.

Authors:  B Sutter; G Friehs; G Pendl; E Tölly
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 2.216

Review 7.  Soft cervical disc herniation: a retrospective study of 100 cases.

Authors:  A Dubuisson; J Lenelle; A Stevenaert
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 2.216

8.  Anterior discectomy without interbody fusion for cervical disc herniation.

Authors:  V Pointillart; A Cernier; J M Vital; J Senegas
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 3.134

9.  Operative techniques for cervical radiculopathy and myelopathy.

Authors:  R G Kavanagh; J S Butler; J M O'Byrne; A R Poynton
Journal:  Adv Orthop       Date:  2011-08-14

10.  Comparison between open procedure and tubular retractor assisted procedure for cervical radiculopathy: results of a randomized controlled study.

Authors:  Kyoung-Tae Kim; Young-Baeg Kim
Journal:  J Korean Med Sci       Date:  2009-07-29       Impact factor: 2.153

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.