Literature DB >> 23038683

Evaluation of domestic and Yucatan swine nasal sinus anatomy as models for future sinonasal research of medications delivered by standard instruments used in functional endoscopic sinus surgery.

Jay Ching Chieh Wang1, Iain Hathorn, Al-Rahim Habib, Estelle Chang, Amin R Javer.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: There is a need to find an animal model to study new medications to improve mucosal wound healing after functional endoscopic sinus surgery (FESS). Current literature suggests swine as a potential candidate. The lack of information correlating swine computer tomography (CT) and endoscopic sinonasal anatomy prompted us to investigate them in the domestic and Yucatan swine to determine their feasibility as models to test new medications and drug-embedded stents applied using FESS techniques.
METHODS: Two domestic pig heads and 2 Yucatan pig heads were imaged using helical thin slice (1 mm) CT. Two rhinologists analyzed the images and performed endoscopy on the swine. Particular attention was given to accessing the frontal sinus and suturing stents to the nasal septum using standard endoscopic instruments.
RESULTS: CT confirmed that swine sinonasal anatomy is largely similar to human, with all major sinuses present. The middle and inferior turbinates of swine arise from a single uniturbinate. The superior turbinates contain large concha bullosa. Unlike human, swine nasal septum is bone anteriorly and cartilage posteriorly. The frontal sinus ostia, regardless of head size, were consistently around 10 cm from the nasal aperture. On endoscopy, domestic swine frontal sinus ostia were easily accessible for topical medication deposition. Silastic splints can be sutured to the domestic swine septum through the posterior cartilaginous portion, allowing for studies involving medication-eluting material. The narrower nasal cavity of Yucatan pigs prohibited endoscopic maneuvers.
CONCLUSION: Domestic swine, but not Yucatan, are a feasible model for future sinonasal research using standard FESS instruments.
© 2013 ARS-AAOA, LLC.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23038683     DOI: 10.1002/alr.21081

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Forum Allergy Rhinol        ISSN: 2042-6976            Impact factor:   3.858


  7 in total

Review 1.  Bitter and sweet taste receptors in the respiratory epithelium in health and disease.

Authors:  Robert J Lee; Noam A Cohen
Journal:  J Mol Med (Berl)       Date:  2014-11-13       Impact factor: 4.599

Review 2.  Taste receptors in innate immunity.

Authors:  Robert J Lee; Noam A Cohen
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2014-10-17       Impact factor: 9.261

3.  Bitter and sweet taste receptors regulate human upper respiratory innate immunity.

Authors:  Robert J Lee; Jennifer M Kofonow; Philip L Rosen; Adam P Siebert; Bei Chen; Laurel Doghramji; Guoxiang Xiong; Nithin D Adappa; James N Palmer; David W Kennedy; James L Kreindler; Robert F Margolskee; Noam A Cohen
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2014-02-17       Impact factor: 14.808

4.  Taste Receptors: Regulators of Sinonasal Innate Immunity.

Authors:  Ryan M Carey; Nithin D Adappa; James N Palmer; Robert J Lee; Noam A Cohen
Journal:  Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol       Date:  2016-06-28

5.  Histological and anatomical structure of the nasal cavity of Bama minipigs.

Authors:  Jingjing Yang; Lei Dai; Qinghua Yu; Qian Yang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-03-24       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Evaluation of sheep sinonasal endoscopic anatomy as a model for rhinologic research.

Authors:  Luis Macias-Valle; Andres Finkelstein-Kulka; Jamil Manji; Christopher Okpaleke; Salahuddin Al-Salihi; Amin R Javer
Journal:  World J Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2018-05-25

7.  Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Gait Analysis Indicate Similar Outcomes Between Yucatan and Landrace Porcine Ischemic Stroke Models.

Authors:  Sydney E Sneed; Kelly M Scheulin; Erin E Kaiser; Madison M Fagan; Brian J Jurgielewicz; Elizabeth S Waters; Samantha E Spellicy; Kylee J Duberstein; Simon R Platt; Emily W Baker; Steven L Stice; Holly A Kinder; Franklin D West
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2021-01-21       Impact factor: 4.003

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.