Kate Sansam1, Rory J O'Connor, Vera Neumann, Bipin Bhakta. 1. Academic Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Leeds, Level D, Martin Wing, Leeds General Infirmary, Great George Street, Leeds LS1 3EX, United Kingdom. katesansam@hotmail.com
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether simple clinical measures can predict walking ability after lower limb prosthetic rehabilitation. DESIGN: Prospective observational study. SUBJECTS: Ninety five adults who were assessed as suitable for lower limb prosthetic rehabilitation by the multidisciplinary team. METHODS: Information regarding baseline clinical factors (amputation details, comorbidities, physical ability, mood and cognitive ability) was collected prior to provision of the prosthesis. Backward step linear regression was used to identify factors predictive of performance on the Timed Up and Go test following rehabilitation. RESULTS: Seventy one participants were able to complete this walking test and were included in the final analysis. The backward step regression model had an adjusted R2 of 0.588 and comprised 6 factors: age (p = 0.002), gender (p = 0.027), level of amputation (p = 0.000), presence of contracture (p = 0.088), ability to stand on one leg (p = 0.062) and Trail Making Tests A + B (p = 0.047), a test of cognitive flexibility. Cause of amputation (dysvascular or non-dysvascular) was not an independent predictor of walking outcome. CONCLUSION: These results indicate that simple clinical assessments completed prior to prosthetic provision can be used to predict mobility outcome. These findings need to be validated in a larger population across other amputee rehabilitation services and if confirmed could easily be incorporated into routine clinical practice.
OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether simple clinical measures can predict walking ability after lower limb prosthetic rehabilitation. DESIGN: Prospective observational study. SUBJECTS: Ninety five adults who were assessed as suitable for lower limb prosthetic rehabilitation by the multidisciplinary team. METHODS: Information regarding baseline clinical factors (amputation details, comorbidities, physical ability, mood and cognitive ability) was collected prior to provision of the prosthesis. Backward step linear regression was used to identify factors predictive of performance on the Timed Up and Go test following rehabilitation. RESULTS: Seventy one participants were able to complete this walking test and were included in the final analysis. The backward step regression model had an adjusted R2 of 0.588 and comprised 6 factors: age (p = 0.002), gender (p = 0.027), level of amputation (p = 0.000), presence of contracture (p = 0.088), ability to stand on one leg (p = 0.062) and Trail Making Tests A + B (p = 0.047), a test of cognitive flexibility. Cause of amputation (dysvascular or non-dysvascular) was not an independent predictor of walking outcome. CONCLUSION: These results indicate that simple clinical assessments completed prior to prosthetic provision can be used to predict mobility outcome. These findings need to be validated in a larger population across other amputee rehabilitation services and if confirmed could easily be incorporated into routine clinical practice.
Authors: Jaclyn Megan Sions; Tara Jo Manal; John Robert Horne; Frank Bernard Sarlo; Ryan Todd Pohlig Journal: Physiother Theory Pract Date: 2018-06-28 Impact factor: 2.279
Authors: Cory L Christiansen; Thomas Fields; Guy Lev; Ryan O Stephenson; Jennifer E Stevens-Lapsley Journal: PM R Date: 2015-05-12 Impact factor: 2.298
Authors: Sara J Morgan; Dagmar Amtmann; Daniel C Abrahamson; Andre J Kajlich; Brian J Hafner Journal: Qual Life Res Date: 2014-01-20 Impact factor: 4.147
Authors: Evren Karaali; Altuğ Duramaz; Osman Çiloğlu; Mustafa Yalın; Mehmet Atay; Furkan Çağlayan Aslantaş Journal: Turk J Phys Med Rehabil Date: 2020-10-16
Authors: Stefano Brunelli; Augusto Fusco; Marco Iosa; Elena Ricciardi; Marco Traballesi Journal: Medicine (Baltimore) Date: 2015-12 Impact factor: 1.817