Literature DB >> 23037620

Effects of intensity and duration in aerobic high-intensity interval training in highly trained junior cross-country skiers.

Øyvind Sandbakk1, Silvana B Sandbakk, Gertjan Ettema, Boye Welde.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to test whether a long duration of aerobic high-intensity interval training is more effective than shorter intervals at a higher intensity in highly trained endurance athletes. The sample comprised of 12 male and 9 female, national-level, junior cross-country skiers (age, 17.5 ± 0.4 years, maximal oxygen uptake (V[Combining Dot Above]O2max): 67.4 ± 7.7 ml min kg), who performed 8-week baseline and 8-week intervention training periods on dry land. During the intervention period, a short-interval group (SIG, n = 7) added 2 weekly sessions with short duration intervals (2- to 4-minute bouts, total duration of 15-20 minutes), a long-interval group (LIG; n = 7) added 2 weekly sessions with long duration intervals (5- to 10-minute bouts, total duration of 40-45 minutes). The interval sessions were performed with the athletes' maximal sustainable intensity. A control group (CG; n = 7) added 2 weekly sessions with low-intensity endurance training at 65-74% of maximal heart rate. Before and after the intervention period, the skiers were tested for time-trial performance on 12-km roller-ski skating and 7-km hill run. V[Combining Dot Above]O2max and oxygen uptake at the ventilatory threshold (V[Combining Dot Above]O2VT) were measured during treadmill running. After the intervention training period, the LIG-improved 12-km roller ski, 7-km hill run, V[Combining Dot Above]O2max, and V[Combining Dot Above]O2VT by 6.8 ± 4.0%, 4.8 ± 2.6%, 3.7 ± 1.6%, and 5.8 ± 3.3%, respectively, from pre- to posttesting, and improved both performance tests and V[Combining Dot Above]O2VT when compared with the SIG and the CG (all p < 0.05). The SIG improved V[Combining Dot Above]O2max by 3.5 ± 3.2% from pre- to posttesting (p < 0.05), whereas the CG remained unchanged. As hypothesized, a long duration of aerobic high-intensity interval training improved endurance performance and oxygen uptake at the ventilatory threshold more than shorter intervals at a higher intensity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23037620     DOI: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e3182752f08

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Strength Cond Res        ISSN: 1064-8011            Impact factor:   3.775


  14 in total

1.  Markers of biological stress in response to a single session of high-intensity interval training and high-volume training in young athletes.

Authors:  Yvonne Kilian; Florian Engel; Patrick Wahl; Silvia Achtzehn; Billy Sperlich; Joachim Mester
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2016-09-10       Impact factor: 3.078

2.  Programming Interval Training to Optimize Time-Trial Performance: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Michael A Rosenblat; Edward Lin; Bruno R da Costa; Scott G Thomas
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2021-04-07       Impact factor: 11.136

3.  Acute Response of Circulating Vascular Regulating MicroRNAs during and after High-Intensity and High-Volume Cycling in Children.

Authors:  Yvonne Kilian; Udo F Wehmeier; Patrick Wahl; Joachim Mester; Thomas Hilberg; Billy Sperlich
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2016-03-14       Impact factor: 4.566

4.  Effects of Sprint versus High-Intensity Aerobic Interval Training on Cross-Country Mountain Biking Performance: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Allan Inoue; Franco M Impellizzeri; Flávio O Pires; Fernando A M S Pompeu; Andrea C Deslandes; Tony M Santos
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-01-20       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  The Training Characteristics of the World's Most Successful Female Cross-Country Skier.

Authors:  Guro S Solli; Espen Tønnessen; Øyvind Sandbakk
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2017-12-18       Impact factor: 4.566

Review 6.  High Intensity Interval Training (HIIT) Improves Cardiorespiratory Fitness (CRF) in Healthy, Overweight and Obese Adolescents: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Controlled Studies.

Authors:  Rhona Martin-Smith; Ashley Cox; Duncan S Buchan; Julien S Baker; Fergal Grace; Nicholas Sculthorpe
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-04-24       Impact factor: 3.390

7.  Comparing continuous and intermittent exercise: an "isoeffort" and "isotime" approach.

Authors:  Andrea Nicolò; Ilenia Bazzucchi; Jonida Haxhi; Francesco Felici; Massimo Sacchetti
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-04-15       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 8.  The influence of physiobiomechanical parameters, technical aspects of shooting, and psychophysiological factors on biathlon performance: A review.

Authors:  Marko S Laaksonen; Thomas Finkenzeller; Hans-Christer Holmberg; Gerold Sattlecker
Journal:  J Sport Health Sci       Date:  2018-09-08       Impact factor: 7.179

9.  High-Intensity Interval Training Performed by Young Athletes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Florian Azad Engel; Alexander Ackermann; Hamdi Chtourou; Billy Sperlich
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2018-07-27       Impact factor: 4.566

10.  Influence of Interval Training Frequency on Time-Trial Performance in Elite Endurance Athletes.

Authors:  Espen Tønnessen; Jonny Hisdal; Bent R Ronnestad
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-05-04       Impact factor: 3.390

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.