Literature DB >> 23036896

Efficacy and safety of apixaban compared with warfarin according to patient risk of stroke and of bleeding in atrial fibrillation: a secondary analysis of a randomised controlled trial.

Renato D Lopes1, Sana M Al-Khatib, Lars Wallentin, Hongqiu Yang, Jack Ansell, M Cecilia Bahit, Raffaele De Caterina, Paul Dorian, J Donald Easton, Cetin Erol, Justin A Ezekowitz, Bernard J Gersh, Christopher B Granger, Stefan H Hohnloser, John Horowitz, Elaine M Hylek, John J V McMurray, Puneet Mohan, Dragos Vinereanu, John H Alexander.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The Apixaban for Reduction in Stroke and Other Thromboembolic Events in Atrial Fibrillation (ARISTOTLE) trial showed that apixaban is better than warfarin at prevention of stroke or systemic embolism, causes less bleeding, and results in lower mortality. We assessed in this trial's participants how results differed according to patients' CHADS(2), CHA(2)DS(2)VASc, and HAS-BLED scores, used to predict the risk of stroke and bleeding.
METHODS: ARISTOTLE was a double-blind, randomised trial that enrolled 18,201 patients with atrial fibrillation in 39 countries. Patients were randomly assigned apixaban 5 mg twice daily (n=9120) or warfarin (target international normalised ratio 2·0-3·0; n=9081). The primary endpoint was stroke or systemic embolism. The primary safety outcome was major bleeding. We calculated CHADS(2), CHA(2)DS(2)VASc, and HAS-BLED scores of patients at randomisation. Efficacy analyses were by intention to treat, and safety analyses were of the population who received the study drug. ARISTOTLE is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00412984.
FINDINGS: Apixaban significantly reduced stroke or systemic embolism with no evidence of a differential effect by risk of stroke (CHADS(2) 1, 2, or ≥3, p for interaction=0·4457; or CHA(2)DS(2)VASc 1, 2, or ≥3, p for interaction=0·1210) or bleeding (HAS-BLED 0-1, 2, or ≥3, p for interaction=0·9422). Patients who received apixaban had lower rates of major bleeding than did those who received warfarin, with no difference across all score categories (CHADS(2), p for interaction=0·4018; CHA(2)DS(2)VASc, p for interaction=0·2059; HAS-BLED, p for interaction=0·7127). The relative risk reduction in intracranial bleeding tended to be greater in patients with HAS-BLED scores of 3 or higher (hazard ratio [HR] 0·22, 95% CI 0·10-0·48) than in those with HAS-BLED scores of 0-1 (HR 0·66, 0·39-1·12; p for interaction=0·0604).
INTERPRETATION: Because apixaban has benefits over warfarin that are consistent across patient risk of stroke and bleeding as assessed by the CHADS2, CHA2DS2VASc, and HAS-BLED scores, these scores might be less relevant when used to tailor apixaban treatment to individual patients than they are for warfarin. Further improvement in risk stratification for both stroke and bleeding is needed, particularly for patients with atrial fibrillation at low risk for these events. FUNDING: Bristol-Myers Squibb and Pfizer.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23036896     DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60986-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lancet        ISSN: 0140-6736            Impact factor:   79.321


  50 in total

Review 1.  Approach to the new oral anticoagulants in family practice: part 1: comparing the options.

Authors:  James Douketis; Alan David Bell; John Eikelboom; Aaron Liew
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 3.275

2.  Effectiveness and Safety of Standard-Dose Nonvitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulants and Warfarin Among Patients With Atrial Fibrillation With a Single Stroke Risk Factor: A Nationwide Cohort Study.

Authors:  Gregory Y H Lip; Flemming Skjøth; Peter Brønnum Nielsen; Jette Nordstrøm Kjældgaard; Torben Bjerregaard Larsen
Journal:  JAMA Cardiol       Date:  2017-08-01       Impact factor: 14.676

3.  Screening, isolation, and decolonization strategies for vancomycin-resistant enterococci or extended spectrum Beta-lactamase-producing organisms: a systematic review of the clinical evidence and health services impact.

Authors:  C Ho; A Lau; K Cimon; K Farrah; M Gardam
Journal:  CADTH Technol Overv       Date:  2013-02-01

Review 4.  Use of Non-Vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulants in Special Patient Populations with Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation: A Review of the Literature and Application to Clinical Practice.

Authors:  Julie Kalabalik; Gail B Rattinger; Jesse Sullivan; Malgorzata Slugocki; Antonia Carbone; Anastasia Rivkin
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 9.546

5.  Controversy Surrounding ROCKET-AF: A Call for Transparency, But Should We Be Changing Practice?

Authors:  Jason D Matos; Peter J Zimetbaum
Journal:  Arrhythm Electrophysiol Rev       Date:  2016-05

Review 6.  Bleeding in patients receiving non-vitamin K oral anticoagulants: clinical trial evidence.

Authors:  Arthur Bracey; Wassim Shatila; James Wilson
Journal:  Ther Adv Cardiovasc Dis       Date:  2018-09-30

7.  Cost Effectiveness of Implantable Cardiac Monitor-Guided Intermittent Anticoagulation for Atrial Fibrillation: An Analysis of the REACT.COM Pilot Study.

Authors:  Daniel A Steinhaus; Peter J Zimetbaum; Rod S Passman; Peter Leong-Sit; Matthew R Reynolds
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol       Date:  2016-10-04

Review 8.  Top practice-changing articles over the last two years.

Authors:  Scott Kaatz; Brian F Gage
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 2.300

Review 9.  Apixaban: a review of its use for reducing the risk of stroke and systemic embolism in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  Gillian M Keating
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 10.  Apixaban to prevent stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation: a review.

Authors:  Benjamin E Peterson; Sana M Al-Khatib; Christopher B Granger
Journal:  Ther Adv Cardiovasc Dis       Date:  2016-07-31
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.