Literature DB >> 23036783

Court-based participatory research: collaborating with the justice system to enhance sexual health services for vulnerable women in the United States.

Alexis Roth1, J Dennis Fortenberry, Barbara Van Der Pol, Joshua Rosenberger, Brian Dodge, Janet Arno, Janine Waters, David Certo, Michael Reece.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Although jail screening programs have an important role in the diagnosis and treatment of sexually transmissible infections (STI) and HIV among incarcerated individuals, many arrestees are not screened before release. Justice-involved women are at particularly high risk for these conditions because of individual risk behaviour as well as other network-level risk factors. Court-based programs could provide a critical bridge between these women, STI risk counselling and health services. This formative study explored the features of a program that would encourage STI testing among court-involved women. Further, we describe how community-based participatory research principles were adapted for use in a court setting and the resulting justice-public health partnership.
METHODS: Using semistructured interviews and focus group discussions, we explored issues related to health-seeking behaviours, perceived gaps in services for high-risk women and the components of a court-based screening program.
RESULTS: Six focus groups were conducted with women with a history of commercial sex work and staff from the court, as well as local organisations providing HIV and social support services for high-risk women. Community-based participatory research (CBPR) principles facilitated development of relevant research questions and equitable processes, and assisted partners to consider individual and sociostructural sources of health disparities. DISCUSSION: Although not every principle was applicable in a court setting, the CBPR framework was helpful for building cohesion and support for the project. We provide a description of how CBPR principles were operationalised, describe the key lessons learned and discuss the implications for CBPR projects in a community court.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23036783     DOI: 10.1071/SH11170

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sex Health        ISSN: 1448-5028            Impact factor:   2.706


  5 in total

1.  Trichomonas vaginalis and Human Immunodeficiency Virus Coinfection Among Women Under Community Supervision: A Call for Expanded T. vaginalis Screening.

Authors:  Alissa Davis; Anindita Dasgupta; Dawn Goddard-Eckrich; Nabila El-Bassel
Journal:  Sex Transm Dis       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 2.830

2.  Coping strategies and behavioural changes following a genital herpes diagnosis among an urban sample of underserved Midwestern women.

Authors:  Alissa Davis; Alexis Roth; Juanita Ebert Brand; Gregory D Zimet; Barbara Van Der Pol
Journal:  Int J STD AIDS       Date:  2015-03-18       Impact factor: 1.359

3.  The impact of brief messages on HSV-2 screening uptake among female defendants in a court setting: a randomized controlled trial utilizing prospect theory.

Authors:  Alexis M Roth; Barbara Van Der Pol; J Dennis Fortenberry; Brian Dodge; Michael Reece; David Certo; Gregory D Zimet
Journal:  J Health Commun       Date:  2014-12-12

4.  Risk factors associated with sexually transmitted infections among women under community supervision in New York City.

Authors:  Alissa Davis; Dawn Goddard-Eckrich; Anindita Dasgupta; Nabila El-Bassel
Journal:  Int J STD AIDS       Date:  2018-02-22       Impact factor: 1.359

5.  "I'm not gonna be able to do anything about it, then what's the point?": A broad group of stakeholders identify barriers and facilitators to HCV testing in a Massachusetts jail.

Authors:  Alysse G Wurcel; Jessica Reyes; Julia Zubiago; Peter J Koutoujian; Deirdre Burke; Tamsin A Knox; Thomas Concannon; Stephenie C Lemon; John B Wong; Karen M Freund; Curt G Beckwith; Amy M LeClair
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-05-26       Impact factor: 3.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.