PURPOSE: To establish the radiation dose level for single- and dual-source thoracic CT scans in daily practice. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The dose levels delivered during 634 consecutive examinations over a period of 2 months were recorded. The CT scans were performed using: (a) a standard protocol (single source, single energy [group 1]: n=266; dual source, single energy [group 2]: n=276; (b) with prospective ECG synchronisation [group 3]: n=13; or (c) with dual energy [group 4]: n=79. All the acquisitions included kilovoltage selection depending on the weight and automatic milliamperage modulation. RESULTS: The mean DLP of the standard protocols was 97.12 mGycm (group 2; BMI=23.1kg/m(2)) and 211.1 mGycm (group 1; BMI=27.3kg/m(2)), the choice of protocol depending on the diameter of the thorax relative to the diameter of the field of the second source, and therefore on the patient's morphotype. When imaging included examination of the proximal and middle coronary arteries (group 3), the mean DLP was 105.5 mGycm. Morphological and functional imaging (group 4) was obtained with a mean DLP of 404.3 mGycm. CONCLUSION: Depending on the objective of the protocol, the mean DLP varied from 97.12 to 404.3 mGycm.
PURPOSE: To establish the radiation dose level for single- and dual-source thoracic CT scans in daily practice. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The dose levels delivered during 634 consecutive examinations over a period of 2 months were recorded. The CT scans were performed using: (a) a standard protocol (single source, single energy [group 1]: n=266; dual source, single energy [group 2]: n=276; (b) with prospective ECG synchronisation [group 3]: n=13; or (c) with dual energy [group 4]: n=79. All the acquisitions included kilovoltage selection depending on the weight and automatic milliamperage modulation. RESULTS: The mean DLP of the standard protocols was 97.12 mGycm (group 2; BMI=23.1kg/m(2)) and 211.1 mGycm (group 1; BMI=27.3kg/m(2)), the choice of protocol depending on the diameter of the thorax relative to the diameter of the field of the second source, and therefore on the patient's morphotype. When imaging included examination of the proximal and middle coronary arteries (group 3), the mean DLP was 105.5 mGycm. Morphological and functional imaging (group 4) was obtained with a mean DLP of 404.3 mGycm. CONCLUSION: Depending on the objective of the protocol, the mean DLP varied from 97.12 to 404.3 mGycm.
Authors: Rahul D Renapurkar; Andrew Primak; Joseph Azok; Jason Lempel; Yasmeen Tandon; Jennifer Bullen; Frank Dong; Wadih Karim; Ruffin Graham Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2017-01-13 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Xian-Feng Chen; Fan Jiang; Lin Li; Yan Chen; Xin Chen; Yan-Yan Jiang; Li Xiang; Xiao-Jing Ma Journal: Exp Ther Med Date: 2017-06-13 Impact factor: 2.447
Authors: Rahul D Renapurkar; Michael A Bolen; Sankaran Shrikanthan; Jennifer Bullen; Wadih Karim; Andrew Primak; Gustavo A Heresi Journal: Cardiovasc Diagn Ther Date: 2018-08