BACKGROUND: The human menstrual cycle (MC) has historically been the focus of myth and misinformation, leading to ideas that constrain women's activities. OBJECTIVES: We wished to examine one pervasive idea, that the MC is a cause of negative mood, by studying the scientific literature as a whole. We briefly reviewed the history of the idea of premenstrual syndrome and undertook a systematic review of quality studies. METHODS: We searched PubMed, PsycINFO, and article bibliographies for published studies using non-help-seeking samples with daily mood data collected prospectively for a minimum of 1 complete MC. We critiqued their methodologies and tabulated the key findings. RESULTS: Of 47 English language studies identified, 18 (38.3%) found no association of mood with any MC phase; 18 found an association of negative mood in the premenstrual phase combined with another MC phase; and only 7 (14.9%) found an association of negative mood and the premenstrual phase. Finally, the remaining 4 studies (8.5%) showed an association between negative mood and a non-premenstrual phase. Considering the only 41 adequately powered studies, the same phase links were reported by 36.6%, 41.5%, and 13.5% of studies, respectively. Their diversity of methods (sampling, instruments, and cycle phase definitions) precluded a meta-analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Taken together, these studies failed to provide clear evidence in support of the existence of a specific premenstrual negative mood syndrome in the general population. This puzzlingly widespread belief needs challenging, as it perpetuates negative concepts linking female reproduction with negative emotionality.
BACKGROUND: The human menstrual cycle (MC) has historically been the focus of myth and misinformation, leading to ideas that constrain women's activities. OBJECTIVES: We wished to examine one pervasive idea, that the MC is a cause of negative mood, by studying the scientific literature as a whole. We briefly reviewed the history of the idea of premenstrual syndrome and undertook a systematic review of quality studies. METHODS: We searched PubMed, PsycINFO, and article bibliographies for published studies using non-help-seeking samples with daily mood data collected prospectively for a minimum of 1 complete MC. We critiqued their methodologies and tabulated the key findings. RESULTS: Of 47 English language studies identified, 18 (38.3%) found no association of mood with any MC phase; 18 found an association of negative mood in the premenstrual phase combined with another MC phase; and only 7 (14.9%) found an association of negative mood and the premenstrual phase. Finally, the remaining 4 studies (8.5%) showed an association between negative mood and a non-premenstrual phase. Considering the only 41 adequately powered studies, the same phase links were reported by 36.6%, 41.5%, and 13.5% of studies, respectively. Their diversity of methods (sampling, instruments, and cycle phase definitions) precluded a meta-analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Taken together, these studies failed to provide clear evidence in support of the existence of a specific premenstrual negative mood syndrome in the general population. This puzzlingly widespread belief needs challenging, as it perpetuates negative concepts linking female reproduction with negative emotionality.
Authors: Lei Gao; Peng Li; Chelsea Hu; Tommy To; Melissa Patxot; Brigid Falvey; Patricia M Wong; Frank A J L Scheer; Chen Lin; Men-Tzung Lo; Kun Hu Journal: Sleep Date: 2019-05-01 Impact factor: 5.849
Authors: Sanjana Manikandan; Yael I Nillni; Michael J Zvolensky; Kelly J Rohan; Krystle R Carkeek; Teresa M Leyro Journal: Arch Womens Ment Health Date: 2016-08-25 Impact factor: 3.633
Authors: Lilianne M Gloe; Deborah A Kashy; Emily G Jacobs; Kelly L Klump; Jason S Moser Journal: Psychoneuroendocrinology Date: 2021-05-27 Impact factor: 4.693
Authors: Christopher R Beam; Patrizia Pezzoli; Jane Mendle; S Alexandra Burt; Michael C Neale; Steven M Boker; Pamela K Keel; Kelly L Klump Journal: Dev Psychopathol Date: 2020-10-29