Literature DB >> 23034469

The Vicorder device compared with SphygmoCor in the assessment of carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity in patients with peripheral arterial disease.

Yousef Shahin1, Hashem Barakat, Rachel Barnes, Ian Chetter.   

Abstract

To assess the reliability and reproducibility of the Vicorder's carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity (cfPWV) measurements in patients with peripheral arterial disease (PAD) and to compare between cfPWV measurements obtained using the Vicorder with those obtained using the SphygmoCor device as a reference. Some 30 patients with PAD (23 men, mean age 64.9±7.5) underwent cfPWV measurement twice by a single investigator during one visit using the Vicorder and the SphygmoCor according to the manufacturer's instructions. Intra-rater reproducibility for each device was assessed using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) and Bland-Altman method. The latter was also used to compare between the two devices. The mean difference (s.d.) between repeated measurements was 0.03±0.92 m s(-1), P=0.85 and 0.01±0.54 m s(-1), P=0.91 for the SphygmoCor and Vicorder, respectively. Measurements of cfPWV were highly reproducible using both devices (ICC=0.94 and 0.92, for the Vicorder and SphygmoCor, respectively). Limits of Agreement using the Bland-Altman method were -1.07 to 1.09 m s(-1) and -1.79 to 1.85 m s(-1) for the Vicorder and the SphygmoCor, respectively. Bland-Altman plots indicated that 90% of the cfPWV measurements using the Vicorder and 93% of the measurements using the SphygmoCor fell within two s.d.s of the mean difference. Transit time (TT) differed significantly between the two devices (mean difference 30±9.2 m s, P<0.001), with the Vicorder recording higher values. Nevertheless, the two devices recorded nearly similar cfPWV measurements (mean difference -0.69±1.6 m s(-1), P=0.02) with 97% of cfPWV values falling within two s.d. values of the mean difference on Bland-Altman plot. Both devices generated highly reproducible cfPWV measurements in patients with PAD and were in good agreement when compared with each other. However, the discrepancy in TT between the two devices lead to the Vicorder producing lower values of cfPWV at high values produced by the SphygmoCor.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23034469     DOI: 10.1038/hr.2012.144

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hypertens Res        ISSN: 0916-9636            Impact factor:   3.872


  10 in total

1.  Estimation of pulse wave velocity in patients with peripheral artery disease: a word of caution.

Authors:  Victor Aboyans; Ileana Desormais; Aida Oueslati; Philippe Lacroix
Journal:  Hypertens Res       Date:  2015-10-22       Impact factor: 3.872

2.  Peripheral arterial disease screening and diagnostic practice: A scoping review.

Authors:  Cornelius M Donohue; Joseph V Adler; Laura L Bolton
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2019-11-03       Impact factor: 3.315

3.  Vascular and microstructural markers of cognitive pathology.

Authors:  Claudia Coffin; Cynthia K Suerken; James R Bateman; Christopher T Whitlow; Benjamin J Williams; Mark A Espeland; Bonnie C Sachs; Maryjo Cleveland; Mia Yang; Samantha Rogers; Kathleen M Hayden; Laura D Baker; Jeff Williamson; Suzanne Craft; Timothy M Hughes; Samuel N Lockhart
Journal:  Alzheimers Dement (Amst)       Date:  2022-07-06

4.  Flow-mediated slowing shows poor repeatability compared with flow-mediated dilation in non-invasive assessment of brachial artery endothelial function.

Authors:  João Luís Marôco; Marco Pinto; Helena Santa-Clara; Bo Fernhall; Xavier Melo
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-05-24       Impact factor: 3.752

5.  Arteriosclerosis and arterial remodeling; different mechanisms in young adults.

Authors:  Antonios A Argyris; Dimitrios A Vrachatis; Theodore G Papaioannou
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2020-01-19       Impact factor: 3.738

6.  Comparing oscillometric and tonometric methods to assess pulse wave velocity: a population-based study.

Authors:  Rosaria Del Giorno; Chiara Troiani; Sofia Gabutti; Kevyn Stefanelli; Luca Gabutti
Journal:  Ann Med       Date:  2020-08-13       Impact factor: 4.709

7.  A multi-component, community-engaged intervention to reduce cardiovascular disease risk in perimenopausal Latinas: pilot study protocol.

Authors:  Yamnia I Cortés; Diane C Berry; Krista M Perreira; Alison Stuebe; Lee Stoner; Cheryl Woods Giscombé; Jamie Crandell; Lymarí Santíago; Latesha K Harris; Mayra Duran
Journal:  Pilot Feasibility Stud       Date:  2021-01-06

8.  Carotid to femoral pulse wave velocity reflects the extent of coronary artery disease.

Authors:  Britt Hofmann; Marcus Riemer; Christian Erbs; Alexander Plehn; Alexander Navarrete Santos; Andreas Wienke; Rolf-Edgar Silber; Andreas Simm
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2014-08-01       Impact factor: 3.738

9.  Is infant arterial stiffness associated with maternal blood pressure in pregnancy? Findings from a UK birth cohort (Baby VIP study).

Authors:  Ka Ying Bonnie Ng; Nigel A B Simpson; Janet E Cade; Darren C Greenwood; Harry J Mcardle; Etienne Ciantar; Nisreen A Alwan
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-07-12       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Improving the accuracy and robustness of carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity measurement using a simplified tube-load model.

Authors:  Lisheng Xu; Shuran Zhou; Lu Wang; Yang Yao; Liling Hao; Lin Qi; Yudong Yao; Hongguang Han; Ramakrishna Mukkamala; Stephen E Greenwald
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-03-25       Impact factor: 4.996

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.