CONTEXT: Titanium dioxide (TiO₂) factory workers' source specific exposure and dose to airborne particles was studied extensively for particles between 5 nm and 10 μm in size. OBJECTIVE: We defined TiO₂ industry workers' quantitative inhalation exposure levels during the packing of pigment TiO₂ (pTiO₂) and nanoscale TiO₂ (nTiO₂) material from concentrations measured at work area. METHODS: Particle emissions from different work events were identified by linking work activity with the measured number size distributions and mass concentrations of particles. A lung deposit model was used to calculate regional inhalation dose rates in units of particles min⁻¹ and μg min⁻¹ without use of respirators. RESULTS: Workers' average exposure varied from 225 to 700 μg m⁻³ and from 1.15 × 10⁴ to 20.1 × 10⁴ cm⁻⁴. Over 90% of the particles were smaller than 100 nm. These were mainly soot and particles formed from process chemicals. Mass concentration originated primarily from the packing of pTiO₂ and nTiO₂ agglomerates. The nTiO₂ exposure resulted in a calculated dose rate of 3.6 × 10⁶ min⁻¹ and 32 μg min⁻¹ where 70% of the particles and 85% of the mass was deposited in head airways. CONCLUSIONS: The recommended TiO₂ exposure limits in mass by NIOSH and in particle number by IFA were not exceeded. We recommend source-specific exposure assessment in order to evaluate the workers' risks. In nTiO₂ packing, mass concentration best describes the workers' exposure to nTiO₂ agglomerates. Minute dose rates enable the simulation of workers' risks in different exposure scenarios.
CONTEXT: Titanium dioxide (TiO₂) factory workers' source specific exposure and dose to airborne particles was studied extensively for particles between 5 nm and 10 μm in size. OBJECTIVE: We defined TiO₂ industry workers' quantitative inhalation exposure levels during the packing of pigment TiO₂ (pTiO₂) and nanoscale TiO₂ (nTiO₂) material from concentrations measured at work area. METHODS: Particle emissions from different work events were identified by linking work activity with the measured number size distributions and mass concentrations of particles. A lung deposit model was used to calculate regional inhalation dose rates in units of particles min⁻¹ and μg min⁻¹ without use of respirators. RESULTS: Workers' average exposure varied from 225 to 700 μg m⁻³ and from 1.15 × 10⁴ to 20.1 × 10⁴ cm⁻⁴. Over 90% of the particles were smaller than 100 nm. These were mainly soot and particles formed from process chemicals. Mass concentration originated primarily from the packing of pTiO₂ and nTiO₂ agglomerates. The nTiO₂ exposure resulted in a calculated dose rate of 3.6 × 10⁶ min⁻¹ and 32 μg min⁻¹ where 70% of the particles and 85% of the mass was deposited in head airways. CONCLUSIONS: The recommended TiO₂ exposure limits in mass by NIOSH and in particle number by IFA were not exceeded. We recommend source-specific exposure assessment in order to evaluate the workers' risks. In nTiO₂ packing, mass concentration best describes the workers' exposure to nTiO₂ agglomerates. Minute dose rates enable the simulation of workers' risks in different exposure scenarios.
Authors: Saou-Hsing Liou; Candace S J Tsai; Daniela Pelclova; Mary K Schubauer-Berigan; Paul A Schulte Journal: J Nanopart Res Date: 2015-10-19 Impact factor: 2.253
Authors: Ryan F LeBouf; Arthur L Miller; Christopher Stipe; Jonathan Brown; Nate Murphy; Aleksandr B Stefaniak Journal: Environ Sci Process Impacts Date: 2013-06 Impact factor: 4.238
Authors: Antti J Koivisto; Jaana E Palomäki; Anna-Kaisa Viitanen; Kirsi M Siivola; Ismo K Koponen; Mingzhou Yu; Tomi S Kanerva; Hannu Norppa; Harri T Alenius; Tareq Hussein; Kai M Savolainen; Kaarle J Hämeri Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2014-05-16 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Ana S Fonseca; Eelco Kuijpers; Kirsten I Kling; Marcus Levin; Antti J Koivisto; Signe H Nielsen; W Fransman; Yijri Fedutik; Keld A Jensen; Ismo K Koponen Journal: J Nanopart Res Date: 2018-02-21 Impact factor: 2.253
Authors: Tamara Horváth; András Papp; Nóra Igaz; Dávid Kovács; Gábor Kozma; Vivien Trenka; László Tiszlavicz; Zsolt Rázga; Zoltán Kónya; Mónika Kiricsi; Tünde Vezér Journal: Int J Nanomedicine Date: 2018-11-02
Authors: Matteo Crosera; Andrea Prodi; Marcella Mauro; Marco Pelin; Chiara Florio; Francesca Bellomo; Gianpiero Adami; Pietro Apostoli; Giuseppe De Palma; Massimo Bovenzi; Marco Campanini; Francesca Larese Filon Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2015-08-07 Impact factor: 3.390