Literature DB >> 2303333

Glaucomatous visual field damage. Luminance and color-contrast sensitivities.

W M Hart1, S E Silverman, G L Trick, R Nesher, M O Gordon.   

Abstract

Using a modified Humphrey perimeter, we evaluated 16 eyes with primary open-angle glaucoma and visual field loss (defects 0.5-3.0 log units in depth), and 14 normal eyes. Each eye was tested twice in random order with conventional luminance-increment static perimetry and with the perimeter modified to produce a high-luminance yellow adapting background and a blue test stimulus. The background was a broad-spectrum light of 500 nm and above (yellow), while the stimulus was a broad-spectrum light of 500 nm and below (blue). Paired comparisons were made between conventional and blue/yellow sensitivities for every point examined (1184 points in 16 diseased eyes and 1036 points in 14 normal eyes). Defect depths were determined by using the age-corrected norms distributed in the Humphrey Statpac software. In glaucomatous eyes, blue/yellow sensitivity showed greater impairment than did conventional perimetric sensitivity, in which defect depths were less than 1.0 log unit. However, for defects greater than 1.0 log unit in depth, conventional perimetric sensitivity and blue/yellow sensitivity showed equivalent degrees of damage. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was used to compare the ability of blue/yellow and of conventional perimetry in distinguishing between glaucomatous and normal eyes. Results indicated that although blue/yellow color-contrast perimetry may be more sensitive for the detection of incipient glaucomatous damage, in the manifest stages of visual field damage blue/yellow color-contrast perimetry is no more sensitive than is conventional (luminance-increment) perimetry for defining the extent of glaucomatous visual field defects.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2303333

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci        ISSN: 0146-0404            Impact factor:   4.799


  7 in total

1.  Peripheral contrast sensitivity in glaucoma and ocular hypertension.

Authors:  F Falcão-Reis; E O'Donoghue; R Buceti; R A Hitchings; G B Arden
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  1990-12       Impact factor: 4.638

2.  Use of a blue filter in visual field analysis.

Authors:  L A de Jong; J Felius; T J van den Berg; E L Greve
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 4.638

3.  Video color perimetry: impairment in glaucoma suspects.

Authors:  N Accornero; M Capozza; A De Feo; S Rinalduzzi; M De Marinis; J Pecori-Giraldi; A Mollicone; V Volante
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 2.379

4.  Automated perimetry and short wavelength sensitivity in patients with asymmetric intraocular pressures.

Authors:  R A Lewis; C A Johnson; A J Adams
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 3.117

5.  Use of a blue filter in visual field analysis.

Authors:  C E Hugkulstone; S A Vernon
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 4.638

6.  Repeatability of short-duration transient visual evoked potentials in normal subjects.

Authors:  Celso Tello; Carlos Gustavo V De Moraes; Tiago S Prata; Peter Derr; Jayson Patel; John Siegfried; Jeffrey M Liebmann; Robert Ritch
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2010-01-29       Impact factor: 2.379

7.  Macular colour contrast sensitivity in ocular hypertension and glaucoma: evidence for two types of defect.

Authors:  F M Falcao-Reis; F O'Sullivan; W Spileers; C Hogg; G B Arden
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  1991-10       Impact factor: 4.638

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.