BACKGROUND: Echocardiography is a valuable technique to assess cardiac output (CO) in trauma patients, but it does not allow a continuous bedside monitoring. Beat-to-beat CO assessment can be obtained by other techniques, including the pulse contour method MostCare. The aim of our study was to compare CO obtained with MostCare (MC-CO) with CO estimated by transthoracic echocardiography (TTE-CO) in trauma patients. METHODS: Forty-nine patients with blunt trauma admitted to an intensive care unit and requiring hemodynamic optimization within 24 hours from admission were studied. TTE-CO and MC-CO were estimated simultaneously at baseline, after a fluid challenge and after the start of vasoactive drug therapy. RESULTS: One hundred sixteen paired CO values were obtained. TTE-CO values ranged from 2.9 to 7.6 L·min(-1), and MC-CO ranged from 2.8 to 8.2 L·min(-1). The correlation between the two methods was 0.94 (95% confidence interval [CI]=0.89 to 0.97; P<0.001). The mean bias was -0.06 L·min(-1) with limits of agreements (LoA) of -0.94 to 0.82 L·min(-1) (lower 95% CI, -1.16 to -0.72; upper 95% CI, 0.60 to 1.04) and a percentage error of 18%. Changes in CO showed a correlation of 0.91 (95% CI=0.87 to 0.95; P<0.001), a mean bias of -0.01 L·min(-1) with LoA of -0.67 to 0.65 L·min(-1) (lower 95% CI, -0.83 to -0.51; upper 95% CI, 0.48 to 0.81). CONCLUSION: CO measured by MostCare showed good agreement with CO obtained by transthoracic echocardiography. Pulse contour analysis can complement echocardiography in evaluating hemodynamics in trauma patients.
BACKGROUND: Echocardiography is a valuable technique to assess cardiac output (CO) in traumapatients, but it does not allow a continuous bedside monitoring. Beat-to-beat CO assessment can be obtained by other techniques, including the pulse contour method MostCare. The aim of our study was to compare CO obtained with MostCare (MC-CO) with CO estimated by transthoracic echocardiography (TTE-CO) in traumapatients. METHODS: Forty-nine patients with blunt trauma admitted to an intensive care unit and requiring hemodynamic optimization within 24 hours from admission were studied. TTE-CO and MC-CO were estimated simultaneously at baseline, after a fluid challenge and after the start of vasoactive drug therapy. RESULTS: One hundred sixteen paired CO values were obtained. TTE-CO values ranged from 2.9 to 7.6 L·min(-1), and MC-CO ranged from 2.8 to 8.2 L·min(-1). The correlation between the two methods was 0.94 (95% confidence interval [CI]=0.89 to 0.97; P<0.001). The mean bias was -0.06 L·min(-1) with limits of agreements (LoA) of -0.94 to 0.82 L·min(-1) (lower 95% CI, -1.16 to -0.72; upper 95% CI, 0.60 to 1.04) and a percentage error of 18%. Changes in CO showed a correlation of 0.91 (95% CI=0.87 to 0.95; P<0.001), a mean bias of -0.01 L·min(-1) with LoA of -0.67 to 0.65 L·min(-1) (lower 95% CI, -0.83 to -0.51; upper 95% CI, 0.48 to 0.81). CONCLUSION: CO measured by MostCare showed good agreement with CO obtained by transthoracic echocardiography. Pulse contour analysis can complement echocardiography in evaluating hemodynamics in traumapatients.