Literature DB >> 23032896

NCI support for particle therapy: past, present, future.

James A Deye1.   

Abstract

In light of the rising worldwide interest in particle therapy, and proton therapy specifically in the United States, the National Cancer Institute (NCI) is being asked more often about funding for such research and facilities. Many of the questions imply that NCI is naive to the exciting possibilities inherent in particle therapies, and thus they wish to encourage NCI to initiate and underwrite such programs. In fact, NCI has a long track record of support for the translation of hadrons from the physics laboratory to the therapy clinic by way of technology development and scientific investigations of physical and biological processes as well as clinical outcomes. Early work has included continuous funding since 1961 of proton treatments for more than 15,000 patients and facility construction at the Harvard/Massachusetts General Hospital (MGH) site; treatment of 227 patients with the pi-meson facility at Los Alamos between 1974 and 1981; funding of more than $69M for seven neutron therapy centers between 1971 and 1989; many funded projects in boron neutron capture radiation therapy through the present time; and numerous radiobiology projects over the past 50 y. NCI continues to play an active role in the incorporation of protons into randomized clinical trials through the Children's Oncology Group, Radiation Therapy Oncology Group, and the Program Project Grant (P01), which is co-directed by the MGH and MD Anderson Cancer Center. This has required funding development and implementation of guidelines that enable intercomparison of dosimetry and treatment between facilities. NCI has also funded recent efforts to develop new physical processes for the production of particles such as protons. With regard to the future, while it is true that there are no specific funding opportunity announcements directed to particle therapy research, it is also true that NCI remains open to reviewing any research that is compatible with an established mechanism. However, given the very substantial resources that these facilities currently require along with the highly competitive economic environment that now exists, it is clear that scientific review of such grant applications will look to leverage the scientific pursuits that are the NCI mandate with the reality of the clinical practices, just as is the case for photon radiation research. Such leveraging should be enhanced by the growing opportunities and need for international collaborations. On the other hand, these collaborations are complicated by the fact that these particle therapies are now fully reimbursable modalities, which makes it difficult to separate research (the NCI mission) from clinical practice development. This paper seeks to illuminate these new realities in order to encourage the pursuit and funding of the scientific underpinnings of physical methods, radiobiology, and clinical practice with particle therapy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23032896     DOI: 10.1097/HP.0b013e3182609bb7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Phys        ISSN: 0017-9078            Impact factor:   1.316


  4 in total

1.  Cancer treatment: Sharp shooters.

Authors:  Vivien Marx
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2014-04-03       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Summary: achievements, critical issues, and thoughts on the future.

Authors:  Kathryn D Held
Journal:  Health Phys       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 1.316

3.  Proton irradiation induces persistent and tissue-specific DNA methylation changes in the left ventricle and hippocampus.

Authors:  Soren Impey; Carl Pelz; Amanuel Tafessu; Tessa Marzulla; Mitchell S Turker; Jacob Raber
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2016-03-31       Impact factor: 3.969

4.  Bi-directional and shared epigenomic signatures following proton and 56Fe irradiation.

Authors:  Soren Impey; Timothy Jopson; Carl Pelz; Amanuel Tafessu; Fatema Fareh; Damian Zuloaga; Tessa Marzulla; Lara-Kirstie Riparip; Blair Stewart; Susanna Rosi; Mitchell S Turker; Jacob Raber
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-08-31       Impact factor: 4.379

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.