Literature DB >> 23032637

Haploinsufficiency of Tumor Suppressor Genes is Driven by the Cumulative Effect of microRNAs, microRNA Binding Site Polymorphisms and microRNA Polymorphisms: An In silico Approach.

Mayakannan Manikandan1, Ganesh Raksha, Arasambattu Kannan Munirajan.   

Abstract

Haploinsufficiency of tumor suppressor genes, wherein the reduced production and activity of proteins results in the inability of the cell to maintain normal cellular function, is one among the various causes of cancer. However the precise molecular mechanisms underlying this condition remain unclear. Here we hypothesize that single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in the 3'untranslated region (UTR) of mRNAs and microRNA seed sequence (miR-SNPs) may cause haploinsufficiency at the level of proteins through altered binding specificity of microRNAs (miRNAs). Bioinformatics analysis of haploinsufficient genes for variations in their 3'UTR showed that the occurrence of SNPs result in the creation of new binding sites for miRNAs, thereby bringing the respective mRNA variant under the control of more miRNAs. In addition, 19 miR-SNPs were found to result in non-specific binding of microRNAs to tumor suppressors. Networking analysis suggests that the haploinsufficient tumor suppressor genes strongly interact with one another, and any subtle alterations in this network will contribute to tumorigenesis.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cancer; haploinsufficiency; miR-SNPs; microRNA; single nucleotide polymorphism; tumor suppressor genes

Year:  2012        PMID: 23032637      PMCID: PMC3433856          DOI: 10.4137/CIN.S10176

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Inform        ISSN: 1176-9351


Introduction

Cancer is a complex genetic disease involving structural and expression abnormalities of both coding and non-coding genes. The search for cancer causing genes has identified two major classes namely the oncogenes and tumor suppressor genes (TSGs). Activation or over expression of a proto-oncogene, such as cMyc,1 or inactivation of a tumor suppressor, such as TP53,2,3 causes tumorigenicity. Oncogene activation in tumors is straightforward, while the inactivation of TSGs is a complex process attained by different means including mutations, deletions, down regulation by microRNAs, epigenetic silencing etc. Although complete loss of TSG is common in tumors, recent studies indicate that a partial compromise in TSG function termed ‘haploinsufficiency’ contributes to the development and progression of many cancers.4 The condition where one functional allele of a gene is lost by mutation or deletion, and the remaining normal allele is insufficient to execute its original physiological function, is called haploinsufficiency. This phenomenon is extensively applicable to TSGs5 as they offer a benefit for cancer cells in regards to proliferation,6 survival,7 and metastasis.8 In principle, haploinsufficient TSGs are impaired by a 50% reduction in expression or activity. However, in vivo studies demonstrate that even a subtle 20% reduction of PTEN protein level—termed as ‘quasi-insufficiency’— could contribute to the development of cancer.9 Another example is that TP53, when targeted by short hairpin RNAs (shRNAs), is shown to elicit distinct phenotypes ranging from hyperplasia to malignancy in mouse models depending on the reduction in its protein level.10 This proves that some TSGs, like PTEN, are exquisitely sensitive to dose, while some, like TP53, are intermediately sensitive. Based on such observations, Berger et al has proposed a continuum model that accounts for subtle dosage effects of tumor suppressors including their regulation by microRNAs.11 The dosage and function of haploinsufficient genes are critical, and understanding the impact of haploinsufficiency is important for assessment of interindividual genetic variation, as well as the molecular basis of haploinsufficiency disorders. Haploinsufficiency of multiple genes cooperate to promote tumorigenesis, a phenomenon called ‘compound haploinsufficiency’. The 5q deletion syndrome (5q-) is a paradigm of compound haploinsufficiency and demonstrates the importance of combinatorial interactions to elicit specific phenotypes.12 Experimental evidence has shown that co-suppression of linked 8p TSGs promotes tumor formation more potently than any individual gene.13 All the available evidence indicates that the functioning of a cell depends on the appropriate expression levels of proteins and, more importantly, that cell signalling pathways involve complex interactions between many proteins. Not only genes, but also microRNAs (miRNAs), a class of small noncoding RNAs, are shown to be haploinsufficient and to cause developmental abnormalities in humans.14 In addition, genes involved in miRNA biosynthesis pathway, such as DICER1, TARBP2 and XPO5, are identified as haploinsufficient tumor suppressors.15–17 miRNAs act at the post-transcriptional level of gene regulation through RNA-induced silencing complex (RISC) mediated translational inhibition or mRNA cleavage. The miRNA target recognition is mediated through the sequence complementarity between the 2–8 nt at the 5′ end of miRNA (seed sequence) and the 3′-UTR of target mRNA.18 Based on the degree of complementarity, the mRNA is either guided for inhibition of translation or degradation resulting in the decrease of protein encoded by the target messenger.19 This has extended the dimensions of haploinsufficiency as miRNAs can lead to the production of insufficient amount of proteins. Bioinformatics prediction and experimental analysis suggested that miRNAs can regulate approximately half of the mammalian genes, with a significant number of important oncogenes and tumor suppressor genes involved.20,21 A recent genome-wide association study has suggested that a gene with more than two miRNA target sites will have higher variability of expression than a gene which is not regulated by a miRNA. The variability is further increased by SNPs in the miRNA target sites.22 Polymorphisms in the miRNA regulatory pathway are a novel class of functional polymorphisms present in the human genome. The initial demonstration that miRNA binding site variations can result in a phenotype was provided by Abelson et al who identified a mutation in the miR-189 binding site of SLITRK1 and its association with Tourette’s syndrome.23 A pioneering study conducted by Carlo Croce’s group showed that a germline mutation in pri-miR-16-1 resulted in low levels of miR-16-1 expression in familial chronic lymphocytic leukemia,24,25 providing evidence that sequence variation in miRNA genes may affect function and result in cancer susceptibility. Pre- and pri-miRNA SNPs in miR-124-1, miR-146a, miR-196-a2, miR-218, miR-219-1, miR-26a-1, miR-27a, miR-423, miR-492, and miR-499 have already been shown to increase/decrease cancer risk in various populations.26 Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) are single base pair changes in DNA that occur with a frequency of about 1 in 12,500 bp in the genome.27 Several studies have shown that SNPs in microRNA networks moderately increase the risk of cancer incidence.28 In general, sequence variations in pri-miRNAs, premiRNAs, mature miRNAs, and microRNA binding sites potentially affects the processing and/or target selection of miRNAs. As a consequence, aberrant expression of hundreds of genes and pathways greatly affecting miRNA function may occur.29 SNPs in mature miRNAs and miRNA binding sites function analogously to modulate the miRNA-mRNA interaction and create or destroy miRNA binding sites. Supporting this idea, SNPs within the miRNA binding sites of genes have been implicated in susceptibility to various types of cancer.30–33 Additionally, functional support for individual miR-SNPs implicated in cancer do exist. In this study we analyzed the role of SNPs that occur at miRNA binding sites and miR-SNPs and their contribution towards haploinsufficiency of tumor suppressor genes.

Materials and Methods

Datasets

A total of 110 haploinsufficient genes known to have a role in tumor initiation and progression were considered for the study. Among the total list, 63 tumorigenic haploinsufficient genes were obtained from Dang et al, 200834 while the remaining 47 genes were compiled using keyword search in PubMed and Online Mendelian Inheritance in Man (OMIM) database. For a comprehensive list of the haploinsufficient tumorigenic genes included in this study with their corresponding reference, see Supplement 1.

Analysis of 3′UTR polymorphisms in mRNA targets and miR seed

The haploinsufficient genes were analyzed for polymorphisms in their 3′UTR by submitting the respective gene ID in ‘Polymorphism in microRNA Target Site’ (PolymiRTS) database,35 http://compbio.uthsc.edu/miRSNP/, designed to identify SNPs that disrupt the regulation of gene expression by miRNAs in human and mouse (last accessed on June 7th, 2012). The database is organized to provide links between SNPs in miRNA target sites, cis-acting expression quantitative trait loci (eQTLs), and the results of genome-wide association studies (GWAS) of human diseases. We applied filters to identify only the SNPs in the 3′UTR that were known to create binding sites for miRNAs and SNPs occurring in the seed region of miRNA themselves.

Classification and validation of SNPs obtained from polymiRTS

The SNPs predicted by the polymiRTS database were classified based on their effect into the following categories: (i) SNPs that lead to the creation of miRNA binding sites in the mRNA, (ii) SNPs that disrupted the originally existing miRNA binding sites and also resulted in creation of new miRNA binding sites in the mRNA, and (iii) miR-SNPs that altered the binding specificity of miRNAs. After classification, the SNPs were verified by submitting their rs ID in the NCBI’s dbSNP Short genetic variation database http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/projects/SNP/using the batch query option. The output was downloaded in BED format and analyzed. Among the total 158 SNPs submitted, 156 SNPs were validated by dbSNP while 2 miR-SNPs (rs116596918 and rs116838571) were found to be new entries and validated by microRNA-related Single Nucleotide Polymorphism database (http://www.bioguo.org/miRNASNP/miRNA_details.php).36

Functional network prediction using GeneMANIA Cytoscape plug-in

To identify the functional significance, GeneMANIA Cytoscape plug-in which employs the GeneMANIA algorithm37,38 was utilized with default settings to plot the interactions among the haploinsufficient TSGs. The complete list of tumorigenic haploinsufficient genes were uploaded to Cytoscape39 using GeneMANIA plug-in (http://www.genemania.org/plugin/). Further, only the genes that were found to have SNPs in their miRNA binding sites and those that are non-specifically targeted by miRNAs harboring miR-SNPs were uploaded individually to study the interactions among this subgroup. The GeneMANIA Cytoscape plug-in integrates association networks from multiple sources into a single composite network using a conjugate gradient optimization algorithm. This algorithm produces networks from the data either directly (as in the case of protein or genetic interactions) or by using an in-house analysis pipeline to convert profiles to functional association networks.

Results and Discussion

Polymorphisms in 3′UTR of mRNA

Our analysis of tumorigenic haploinsufficient genes for genetic variations in the 3′UTR showed that 26% (29 out of 110) of them had at least one 3′UTR SNP resulting in creation of new binding sites for miRNAs thereby bringing the respective mRNA variant under the control of more new miRNAs. In total, 129 SNPs were found to create binding sites for 234 miRNAs in 29 genes (Table 1). Altogether, these SNPs contribute to haploinsufficiency by bringing the polymorphic mRNA under the control of more new microRNAs thereby leading to translational repression or mRNA degradation. PPARA, a nuclear transcription factor and KIF1B, a kinesin implicated in neuronal and non-neuronal tumors was found to harbor 17 SNPs creating putative binding sites for many miRNAs. On the contrary, the SNP rs121912664 in TP53 creates putative miRNA binding site for miRNA-302 family, miR-520 family, miR-372, and miR-373-3p. The cell adhesion molecule CDH1, an important gene in tumor invasion with frequent allelic loss in metastatic tumors, was found to have 5 different SNPs that create putative binding sites for new miRNAs thereby altering the repertoire of miRNAs controlling this gene. Even RB1, the classical TSG, was predicted to have 3 SNPs that may down regulate its expression. If one allele is already lost in tumors, the remaining allele having at least one of these SNPs may be targeted by miRNAs and thereby lead to complete loss of cellular function, as postulated by Knudson’s “two-hit hypothesis.”
Table 1

List of SNPs in the haploinsufficient tumor suppressor genes that created microRNA binding sites in their 3′UTR.

GeneLocationSNP IDAllele changemicroRNA binding site created for
ATM108236469rs3092834C to Thsa-miR-4252
108237460rs187308124C to Thsa-miR-4428
108237837rs227091C to T4 microRNAs*
108238032rs114847811C to Thsa-miR-600
108239075rs186644530A to Ghsa-miR-2117
108239099rs191399133T to Chsa-miR-4448
108239463rs3092852C to Thsa-miR-1265
BAG133253621rs191119067G to Chsa-miR-4452, hsa-miR-4680-3p
CAMTA17827003rs183056496G to Ahsa-miR-582-3p
7828815rs112733335G to Ahsa-miR-342-3p
CDH168867609rs35942505C to T6 microRNAs*
68868146rs140240766C to Ahsa-miR-427
68868576rs9282654T to Ghsa-miR-129-1-3p, hsa-miR-129-2-3p
68869062rs33967108G to Chsa-miR-1273a
68869394rs146556488C to Ahsa-miR-369-3p
CDKN1B12874056rs114975362G to Thsa-miR-3919
CHEK1125525308rs148807246A to Ghsa-miR-1184, hsa-miR-1205, hsa-miR-3158-5p
125545904rs192805943G to Ahsa-miR-2964a-3p
CLU27454684rs9331949A to Ghsa-miR-1283
CTCF67672530rs187258944G to Thsa-miR-2276
DFFB3800550rs146888429G to Ahsa-miR-1227
3800570rs140704651C to T4 microRNAs*
DIRC2122598847rs150233566G to Chsa-miR-4797-5p
122599452rs180703954A to Chsa-miR-3927, hsa-miR-4451, hsa-miR-4732-5p
ETV612043995rs183579990C to Ghsa-miR-3160-3p, hsa-miR-558
12044403rs79663578T to Ahsa-miR-5011-5p
12045614rs183305984G to Ahsa-miR-3690
12045861rs72550771T to Chsa-miR-4774-5p
FBXW7153243322rs4399968G to Chsa-miR-338-3p, hsa-miR-634
FEN161564571rs141406755T to Chsa-miR-3654
KIF1B10365509rs180831292C to Ghsa-miR-4768-5p
10365953rs72640311T to Ghsa-miR-1972
10366284rs115354754A to Chsa-miR-3934, hsa-miR-764
10366763rs56164683A to Ghsa-miR-27a-3p, hsa-miR-27b-3p
10366766rs187140427A to Thsa-miR-376c
10367056rs41274464G to Ahsa-miR-148b-5p, hsa-miR-3168
10367348rs142468272C to A4 microRNAs*
10367422rs2004034G to A6 microRNAs*
10367577rs143823495G to Thsa-miR-4494, hsa-miR-4499
10367816rs145128126A to Thsa-miR-3941, hsa-miR-466, hsa-miR-4672
10437247rs2155760C to T8 microRNAs*
10437802rs4240913G to Ahsa-miR-645
10438336rs189264558A to Ghsa-miR-516a-3p, hsa-miR-516b-3p
10439362rs186201500A to Chsa-miR-199a-5p, hsa-miR-199b-5p, hsa-miR-644a
10439538rs184232081G to Ahsa-miR-4425
10440756rs192312673C to Thsa-miR-4797-5p
10440757rs148005450G to Ahsa-miR-4534
KLF573650341rs117651109C to Thsa-miR-5579-5p
MDM269235650rs144972734A to Ghsa-miR-671-5p
69236143rs190072365C to Thsa-miR-934
69236269rs142063414G to Ahsa-miR-3198, hsa-miR-4309
69236548rs1690917G to T4 microRNAs*
69237299rs183077346T to Ahsa-miR-889
69237446rs150137388A to Ghsa-miR-9-3p
69238249rs141938174C to Thsa-miR-4705
69238568rs148584832G to Ahsa-miR-4522
69238940rs184278637G to A6 microRNAs
PAX536839029rs184505592G to Chsa-miR-4520a-3p
PPARA46631658rs4253801A to Ghsa-miR-4709-5p
46631718rs183307497A to Ghsa-miR-5095, hsa-miR-600
46631838rs188241700T to Ghsa-miR-1470, hsa-miR-4287, hsa-miR-4685-3p
46632587rs9615264G to Ahsa-miR-1231
46632932rs181140325T to Ahsa-miR-4277
46633120rs78922364G to Chsa-miR-499b-5p
46633549rs115356860C to Thsa-miR-892b
46633564rs148478205C to Thsa-miR-4252
46634352rs184920139G to Ahsa-miR-301a-5p
46634514rs41418950C to Thsa-miR-936
46635061rs41403648G to Ahsa-miR-3944-5p, hsa-miR-5094
46636623rs56180992G to Ahsa-miR-515-5p, hsa-miR-519e-5p
46637760rs181781384A to Ghsa-miR-4733-3p
46638155rs1055658G to Chsa-miR-744-5p
46638209rs79700435G to Ahsa-miR-3191-5p, hsa-miR-518c-5p
46639161rs187605878A to Ghsa-miR-3157-3p
46639611rs117317496G to Chsa-miR-5584-5p
PTCH198205709rs28413010A to Thsa-miR-126-5p, hsa-miR-4795-3p
98206995rs41316950C to Ghsa-miR-4690-3p, hsa-miR-5685
PTEN89725452rs3895069T to Ghsa-miR-5003-5p
89726622rs79395513C to Ahsa-miR-651
89726726rs180953647C to Thsa-miR-510
RAD50131980172rs146790944A to Ghsa-miR-300, hsa-miR-381
131980267rs139468574A to Ghsa-miR-4524a-5p, hsa-miR-4524b-5p
131980270rs75939007A to G4 microRNAs*
RB149054521rs187845274T to Ahsa-miR-4638-3p
49054779rs150194261T to Chsa-miR-145-5p, hsa-miR-5195-3p
49055241rs192758219G to Thsa-miR-1323, hsa-miR-548o-3p
RXRA137328831rs1805346G to Ahsa-miR-3688-3p
137328936rs189590058C to Thsa-miR-4738-3p
137329304rs4240711G to Ahsa-miR-3184-3p
137329411rs34449651G to Chsa-miR-3919
137329652rs35283205G to Chsa-miR-4685-5p
137330306rs180869938T to Chsa-miR-1908, hsa-miR-663a
137330727rs17847916C to Thsa-miR-4721
137330802rs10119893G to A5 microRNAs*
137330980rs139882385T to Chsa-miR-518a-5p, hsa-miR-527
137331443rs139749844G to Ahsa-miR-3170, hsa-miR-5572
137331999rs11103561G to Ahsa-miR-4722-3p, hsa-miR-4769-3p
137332362rs187745805G to Ahsa-miR-5010-3p, hsa-miR-599
137332378rs137912651G to Chsa-miR-301a-5p
SERPINB561171674rs112795011A to Chsa-miR-4535, hsa-miR-4776-5p
SMAD448605247rs28403611A to Ghsa-miR-552
48605297rs191822473G to Ahsa-miR-656
48605643rs183984903A to Ghsa-miR-5095
48607107rs189547031G to Chsa-miR-5584-5p
48607497rs191637734A to Thsa-miR-421, hsa-miR-4272
48608123rs191317135C to Thsa-miR-3163
48609056rs150556996G to Thsa-miR-4496
48609588rs112739300C to Thsa-miR-297, hsa-miR-3149, hsa-miR-675-3p
48609716rs184516281T to Chsa-miR-584-3p
48609918rs145596898G to Ahsa-miR-4694-3p
48610254rs146551171T to C23 microRNAs*
48610822rs12954419T to Ahsa-miR-5696
48610844rs181250637G to Chsa-miR-636
48611357rs183472455C to Thsa-miR-371b-5p, hsa-miR-373-5p, hsa-miR-616-5p
SOX970121452rs74999341T to Chsa-miR-4759
70121525rs185467299C to Thsa-miR-4514, hsa-miR-4692, hsa-miR-4742-5p
TNFAIP3138202555rs140042278G to Thsa-miR-208a, hsa-miR-208b, hsa-miR-499a-5p
138202864rs76710415A to Chsa-miR-4533
138203096rs73778206T to Chsa-miR-223-3p
138203386rs191520762T to Ghsa-miR-4772-3p
138203884rs73778207G to Ahsa-miR-96-3p
TP537572039rs35659787G to Ahsa-miR-516b-5p, hsa-miR-518c-5p
7574010rs17882252G to Ahsa-miR-127-5p
7574015rs121912664G to A12 microRNAs*
VHL10191771rs34362094C to Thsa-miR-5579-5p
10192172rs190102073A to Ghsa-miR-4448
10193434rs115303528G to Ahsa-miR-592, hsa-miR-599
10193848rs145666034G to Ahsa-miR-3545-3p
10194195rs187719061A to Ghsa-miR-371a-5p

Notes: This table enlists the 129 SNPs that create new miRNA binding sites in the 3′UTR of their respective haploinsufficient tumor suppressor gene. Table compiled from the data provided by PolymiRTS database.

For convenience these microRNAs are not indicated in the table, and for details the reader is referred to Supplement 2.

Another 10 SNPs were found to bring 8 different genes under the control of additional new miRNAs due to the presence of the respective SNP (Fig. 1). A single SNP can create miR binding site for several miRNAs as well as delete a miR binding site. For example, the SNP rs186304832 in the 3′UTR of KIF1B results in the loss of binding of 2 different microRNAs to the variant mRNA while 7 new microRNAs will be targeting this particular variant. This alters the miRNA mediated gene expression control resulting in aberrant regulation of expression. A gene that was previously under the control of one miRNA comes under the control of 3 different new miRNAs which leads to extensive translational repression resulting in protein haploinsufficiency as represented by the polymorphism rs1138533 in CDH1. This mechanism is totally new, since one allele is not lost due to mutation or deletion, as in the case of classical haploinsufficiency. Rather there is a decrease in the overall protein product. In homozygous state, this SNP may result in complete or partial reduction in the expression based on the ability of the repressing miRNA. However, in heterozygous state, the same SNP can lead to 50% or even subtler reduction in expression, which can explain ‘quasi-insufficiency’.
Figure 1

Effect of SNPs occurring in the 3′UTR of haploinsufficient tumor suppressor genes.

Notes: SNPs in the 3′UTR of haploinsufficient tumor suppressor genes result in creation of new miRNA binding sites as well as deletion of originally existing miRNA binding sites. The 10 SNPs plotted here against their effect on miRNA binding sites contributes to haploinsufficiency, as they bring the polymorphic mRNA under the control of more new microRNAs.

Ours is the first study to identify the SNP and miRNA mediated control of tumor suppressor dose as well as highlighting the importance of genetic variations in cancer. This mechanism is in agreement with the continuum model for tumor suppression that is related to the level of expression or activity of the TSG rather than to the discrete step-by-step changes in gene copy number.11

Polymorphisms in microRNA seed sequence

In addition, SNPs that occur in the seed sequence of miRNAs can alter the binding specificity of these miRNAs resulting in the binding to new non-target mRNAs. We analyzed 19 such miR-SNPs that cause miRNAs to bind new haploinsufficient tumor suppressor genes (Table 2). The SNP rs4636784 occurring in the seed of hsa-miR-4305 alters the binding specificity, thereby enabling it to target 6 new haploinsufficient genes (CDH1, KIF1B, SMAD4, DFFB, FOXP1, and PTEN). This can contribute to compound haploinsufficiency, wherein multiple genes cooperate to cause a particular phenotype.7,13 Alteration in one miRNA can alter the entire set of genes under its control thereby providing an advantage for cancer initiation and progression. In addition, the acquisition of miR-SNPs in tumors is simple enough to deregulate many genes than the need for individual mutations in all of them. This mechanism of miR-SNP mediated down regulation can also be extended to the unexplained allelic loss of KIF1B in neuroblastomas, where the tumor suppressor was shown to have no mutations or promoter methylation.40 Tumors not showing genetic alterations in the TSG, but with aberrant TSG levels due to miRNA misregulation, could behave like tumors with deletion or mutation of the gene. Importantly, mapping the interactions between miRNAs and TSGs could be useful for defining and predicting cancer susceptibility and therapeutic response.
Table 2

SNPs in miR seed and their new target haploinsufficient genes.

miR IDSNP IDmiR seedAlleleHaploinsufficient gene targets
hsa-mir-125ars12975333CCCUGA[G/U]G/TATM, MSH2
hsa-miR-1268rs28599926GGGC[G/A]UGG/AATM, PAX5, PPARA, PTEN, NBN
hsa-miR-1469rs116596918UCGGC[G/C]CC/GDDB2, FOXP1
hsa-miR-3610rs112072631AAUCGG[A/C]C/ASERPINB5, SMAD4
hsa-miR-3615rs112977728CU[C/U]UCGGC/TRAD50, NBN, TP53BP2
hsa-miR-3618rs12159555GU[C/G]UACAC/GDFFB, PPARA, SMAD4, FOXP1
hsa-miR-3689brs116838571GUGAU[A/U]UT/ACDH1, CDKN1B, FBXW7, RB1, VHL, BRCA2, ROR2, TP53BP2, YWHAE
hsa-miR-379rs61991156GGUAG[A/G]CA/GCAMTA1, DFFB, TNFAIP3, VHL
hsa-miR-4257rs74743733CAGA[G/A]GUA/GCHEK1, DIRC2, ETV6, PAX5, SOX9
hsa-miR-4284rs11973069GGCUCA[C/U]C/TBAG1, ETV6, TP53BP2
hsa-miR-4305rs4636784CUA[G/C]ACAG/CCDH1, DFFB, FBXW7, KIF1B, PTEN, SMAD4, FOXP1, NBN, MDM2
hsa-miR-4322rs114399468UGUGG[G/A]CA/GCHEK1, KIF1B, PTEN, RAD50, SERPINB5
hsa-miR-557rs78825966UUUGCA[C/U]C/TBAG1, CHEK1, BRCA2, RPL37A, KLF5
hsa-miR-585rs62376935GG[G/A]CGUAG/ABAG1, KIF1B, NBN, TP53BP2
hsa-miR-605rs113212828[A/G]AAUCCCA/GRAD50, RB1, VHL, MSH2
hsa-miR-642ars78902025UCCC[U/G]CUG/TATM, PPARA, SERPINB5
hsa-miR-642brs111664333GA[C/U]ACAUT/CATM, RAD50, SMAD4, NBN, TP53BP2
hsa-miR-936rs79924817C[A/G]GUAGAG/AATM, BAG1, PPARA, RAD50, XPO5
hsa-miR-938rs12416605[G/A]CCCUUAG/ABAG1, PPARA, PTEN, SMAD4, SOX9, TNFAIP3, XPO5, MDM2

Notes: This table represents the miR-SNPs that render microRNAs to bind with non-specificity to haploinsufficient tumor suppressor genes. Table compiled from the data extracted from PolymiRTS database.

Networks

Although reports on haploinsufficient genes associated with cancer is limited, analysis of the existing data shows that at least one third of total haploinsufficient genes to be tumorigenic. Tumor suppressors often act as components of complex networks, the overall function of which can be impaired by genetic and epigenetic alterations.41,42 For this reason we analyzed whether the haploinsufficient tumor suppressor genes share a common pathway or fall in a common interacting or functional network. The GeneMANIA algorithm was utilized for this purpose, and results indicate that almost 99% of haploinsufficient genes have a strong interaction, either directly or indirectly. SMAD5 was excluded from the list as it was not recognized by the algorithm. Co-expression, co-localization, physical and genetic interactions, pathway interactions, and other interactions that arise through shared structural domains were shown to exist between the queried genes (Fig. 2). SPRED1 was the only gene to fall out of this network however co-expression links it to the group. Apart from the queried list of genes, the algorithm identified several other genes to be a part of this network including DROSHA, DFFA, MRE11A, TRAPPC2L, TERF2, CDK6, BUB1, WRN, CCNA2, and RAD51. Interestingly, the haploinsufficient status of some of these genes has already been described in developmental abnormalities and other diseases,43–45 while some others are shown to have a role in tumor formation and their haploinsufficient status is yet to be established.46
Figure 2

Interactions among 109 haploinsufficient genes plotted using GeneMANIA plug-in available in Cytoscape.

Notes: Networking analysis of 109 genes by GeneMANIA algorithm revealed different type of interactions between them. Gray circles represent the queried genes, and white circles represent the predicted genes that mediate interactions. Color representations for edges: purple—co-expression, dark blue—physical interaction, green—genetic interaction, light blue—co-localization, and brown—predicted. The network consists of physical, genetic and predicted interactions which can be clearly seen.

Next we tested whether the 39 genes with SNPs in miRNA binding sites or targeted by miRNAs with altered specificity due to miR-SNPs fall in to a particular network or pathway. Results of GeneMANIA networking analysis suggested strong interactions between these genes (Fig. 3). DNA repair genes and cell cycle checkpoint genes were enriched in this network and any aberrations in their expression offers selective advantage for the tumors to acquire additional genomic changes or mutations. DFFB was linked by co-expression, while DIRC2 was shown to be completely out of the group. The following genes were found to be a part of this network and to mediate interactions between the queried genes: MRE11A, DFFA, CCNB1, POLQ, AP1B1, RAD51, CCNG1, NPM1, DDB1, and WRN. The identification of the mRNA targets that mediate the actions of miRNAs in disease pathways can reveal previously unrecognized components that may serve as targets for more traditional drug development.
Figure 3

Interactions among 39 haploinsufficient genes that either had miRNA binding site SNPs or were targeted non-specifically by miRNAs carrying miR-SNPs.

Notes: Networking analysis of 39 genes by GeneMANIA algorithm revealed different type of interactions among them. Gray circles represent the queried genes and white circles represent the predicted genes that mediate interactions. Pink circles denote the genes involved in DNA repair and blue circles represent the cell cycle checkpoint genes. Among the queried list, DIRC2 does not show any type of interaction. Color representations for edges: purple— co-expression, dark blue—physical interaction, green—genetic interaction, light blue—co-localization, and brown—predicted. The network consists of physical, genetic and predicted interactions which can be clearly seen.

Conclusion

With the expanding understanding of the roles of miRNAs in various cellular processes and diseases, this is the first report to discuss the role of miRNAs and its contribution towards tumor suppressor gene haploinsufficiency at the protein level via 3′UTR SNPs and miR-SNPs. Further, this could be an alternate means for attaining compound heterozygosity observed in several tumors and the mechanism is in complete agreement with the continuum model of tumor suppression.11 Our data suggests that 26% of the tumorigenic haploinsufficient genes were brought under the control of new miRNAs due to 3′UTR SNPs. The identification of 10 SNPs that drive haploinsufficiency by bringing the polymorphic mRNA under the control of miRNAs, other than the miRNAs which are deleted, needs experimental validation in tumors. This alteration in the miRNA mediated gene regulation may cause predisposition to cancer initiation and progression. Evidence for co-operative contribution of oncogenic mutations with tumor suppressor haploinsufficiency also exist.47 The realization that miR-SNPs play central roles in the aberrant regulation of tumor suppressor genes has provided a new perspective on our understanding of pathophysiologic mechanisms. In addition, networking analysis reveals strong interactions between the haploinsufficient tumor suppressor genes. Any subtle alteration in this network of genes due to SNPs at the 3′UTR and miR-SNPs may contribute to pathogenesis. We suggest that at least a few among these SNPs and their effect on miRNA binding will aid in the diagnosis and/or prognosis of such type of cancers, if experimentally validated. While challenges remain in this regard, the pace of development in this field suggests that new discoveries are forthcoming. Our approach has currently focused only on analyzing 3′UTRs, although a small subset of miRNAs can target 5′UTRs, coding regions, and gene promoters. miR-SNPs leading to non-specific binding of miRNAs to tumor suppressors may also result in the loss of binding to their original targets. If the target is an oncogene, it will be over expressed and will result in tumorigenesis. This has not been focused on in this study. Since the rules for miRNA binding to its target changes constantly,48 the databases need constant updating. The 110 tumor suppressor genes chosen for our study were already proven to be haploinsufficient in several cancers through experimental evidence. This list may likely grow due to continuous identification of haploinsufficient tumor suppressors. List of Haploinsufficient genes known to be involved in tumorigenesis. Supporting information for Table 1.
Supplement I

List of Haploinsufficient genes known to be involved in tumorigenesis.

Haploinsufficient genesReferences
ANX7, APC, ARF, ATM, BAG1, BECN1, BRCA1, BRCA2, BUBR1, CAMTA1, CAV1, CDKN1B, CDKN1C, CDKN2B, CSN5, CTCF, DFFB, DIRC2, EEF1E1, ETV6, FBXW7, FOXP1, H2 AX, INI1, INK4C, KLF6, LIG4, LIS1, LKB1, MEL-18, MYH, NHERF1, NKX3–1, NPM1, P53, PAX5, PLK4, PPARA, PPARG, PRKAR1 A, PTCH1, PTEN, RAD50, RASSF1 A, ROR2, RPRM, SAM68, SERCA2, SMAD5, SOCS1, SOX9, SPRED1, ST7, TGFB1, TP53BP2, TP73, TRAPPC2, TSC1, TSC2, VHL, WT1, WWOX, YWHAE11
ATR18
BIM (BCL2 L11)17
BLM21
BUB330
CDH144
CDKN1 A28
CHK1 (CHEK1)33
CLU9
CREBBP (CBP)49, 47, 5
DDB226
DGCR842
DICER132, 2, 41
DLL419, 23
DMP125, 51, 34
DOK24
FBXO1114
FEN131
IKZF1 (IKAROS)39, 29, 52
KIF1Bβ40
KLF510
MAD2 L138
MDM2 and MDM450
MLH148
MSH212, 13, 6
MUS8136
NBN15
NF127, 59
NF235
PINX158
RAD178
RB153, 57
Ribosomal proteins (RPL35, RPL37 A, RPS19 and RPS8)1
RPS1416, 3
RUNX145
RXRA24
SERPINB5 (Maspin)43
SMAD4/DPC456
TARBP237
TIP6020
TNFAIP355, 7
TP53BP154
TP63 (TAp63)46
XPO522
Supplement 2

Supporting information for Table 1.

GeneLocationSNP IDAllele changemiR ID
ATM108237837rs227091C to Thsa-miR-3664-3p, hsa-miR-4433-3p, hsa-miR-4768-3p, hsa-miR-512-5p
CDH168867609rs35942505C to Thsa-miR-548ae, hsa-miR-548ah-3p, hsa-miR-548aj-3p, hsa-miR-548am-3p, hsa-miR-548aq-3p, hsa-miR-548x-3p
DFFB3800570rs140704651C to Thsa-miR-3664-3p, hsa-miR-4433-3p, hsa-miR-4768-3p, hsa-miR-512-5p
KIF1B10367348rs142468272C to Ahsa-miR-4435, hsa-miR-4701-5p, hsa-miR-548s, hsa-miR-588
10367422rs2004034G to Ahsa-miR-25-3p, hsa-miR-32-5p, hsa-miR-363-3p, hsa-miR-367-3p, hsa-miR-92a-3p, hsa-miR-92b-3p
10437247rs2155760C to Thsa-miR-125a-5p, hsa-miR-125b-5p, hsa-miR-4319, hsa-miR-4446-5p, hsa-miR-4732-3p, hsa-miR-4755-5p, hsa-miR-5006-3p, hsa-miR-670
MDM269236548rs1690917G to Thsa-miR-548ac, hsa-miR-548d-3p, hsa-miR-548h-3p, hsa-miR-548z
69238940rs184278637G to Ahsa-miR-3609, hsa-miR-4796-3p, hsa-miR-519a-3p, hsa-miR-519b-3p, hsa-miR-519c-3p, hsa-miR-548ah-5p
RAD50131980270rs75939007A to Ghsa-miR-199a-3p, hsa-miR-199b-3p, hsa-miR-3129-5p, hsa-miR-936
RXRA137330802rs10119893G to Ahsa-miR-1254, hsa-miR-1271-3p, hsa-miR-3116, hsa-miR-550a-3-5p, hsa-miR-550a-5p
SMAD448610254rs146551171T to Chsa-miR-142-5p, hsa-miR-548a-5p, hsa-miR-548ab, hsa-miR-548ak, hsa-miR-548am-5p, hsa-miR-548ap-5p, hsa-miR-548aq-5p, hsamiR-548ar-5p, hsa-miR-548as-5p, hsa-miR-548au-5p, hsa-miR-548av-5p, hsa-miR-548b-5p, hsa-miR-548c-5p, hsa-miR-548d-5p, hsa-miR-548h-5p, hsa-miR-548i, hsa-miR-548j, hsa-miR-548k, hsamiR-548o-5p, hsa-miR-548w, hsa-miR-548y, hsa-miR-559, hsa-miR- 5590-3p
TP537574015rs121912664G to Ahsa-miR-302a-3p, hsa-miR-302b-3p, hsa-miR-302c-3p, hsa-miR-302d-3p, hsa-miR-302e, hsa-miR-372, hsa-miR-373-3p, hsa-miR-520a-3p, hsa-miR-520b, hsa-miR-520c-3p, hsa-miR- 520d-3p, hsa-miR-520e
  102 in total

Review 1.  The widespread regulation of microRNA biogenesis, function and decay.

Authors:  Jacek Krol; Inga Loedige; Witold Filipowicz
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2010-07-27       Impact factor: 53.242

2.  Deletions of the transcription factor Ikaros in myeloproliferative neoplasms.

Authors:  R Jäger; H Gisslinger; F Passamonti; E Rumi; T Berg; B Gisslinger; D Pietra; A Harutyunyan; T Klampfl; D Olcaydu; M Cazzola; R Kralovics
Journal:  Leukemia       Date:  2010-05-27       Impact factor: 11.528

3.  Dmp1 is haplo-insufficient for tumor suppression and modifies the frequencies of Arf and p53 mutations in Myc-induced lymphomas.

Authors:  K Inoue; F Zindy; D H Randle; J E Rehg; C J Sherr
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2001-11-15       Impact factor: 11.361

4.  Enhanced tumor formation in mice heterozygous for Blm mutation.

Authors:  Kathleen Heppner Goss; Mary A Risinger; Jennifer J Kordich; Maureen M Sanz; Joel E Straughen; Lisa E Slovek; Anthony J Capobianco; James German; Gregory P Boivin; Joanna Groden
Journal:  Science       Date:  2002-09-20       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  GeneMANIA Cytoscape plugin: fast gene function predictions on the desktop.

Authors:  J Montojo; K Zuberi; H Rodriguez; F Kazi; G Wright; S L Donaldson; Q Morris; G D Bader
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2010-10-05       Impact factor: 6.937

6.  Involvement of mammalian Mus81 in genome integrity and tumor suppression.

Authors:  John Peter McPherson; Bénédicte Lemmers; Richard Chahwan; Ashwin Pamidi; Eva Migon; Elzbieta Matysiak-Zablocki; Mary Ellen Moynahan; Jeroen Essers; Katsuhiro Hanada; Anuradha Poonepalli; Otto Sanchez-Sweatman; Rama Khokha; Roland Kanaar; Maria Jasin; M Prakash Hande; Razqallah Hakem
Journal:  Science       Date:  2004-06-18       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 7.  TP53 tumor suppressor gene: a model for investigating human mutagenesis.

Authors:  C Caron de Fromentel; T Soussi
Journal:  Genes Chromosomes Cancer       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 5.006

8.  Haploinsufficiency of the maspin tumor suppressor gene leads to hyperplastic lesions in prostate.

Authors:  Long-jiang Shao; Heidi Y Shi; Gustavo Ayala; David Rowley; Ming Zhang
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2008-07-01       Impact factor: 12.701

9.  Prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia in mice with conditional disruption of the retinoid X receptor alpha allele in the prostate epithelium.

Authors:  Jiapeng Huang; William C Powell; Ani C Khodavirdi; Jian Wu; Takako Makita; Robert D Cardiff; Michael B Cohen; Henry M Sucov; Pradip Roy-Burman
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2002-08-15       Impact factor: 12.701

10.  Polymorphisms in predicted microRNA-binding sites in integrin genes and breast cancer: ITGB4 as prognostic marker.

Authors:  Annika Brendle; Haixin Lei; Andreas Brandt; Robert Johansson; Kerstin Enquist; Roger Henriksson; Kari Hemminki; Per Lenner; Asta Försti
Journal:  Carcinogenesis       Date:  2008-06-10       Impact factor: 4.944

View more
  6 in total

1.  Haploinsufficient tumor suppressor genes.

Authors:  Kazushi Inoue; Elizabeth A Fry
Journal:  Adv Med Biol       Date:  2017 1st Quarter

2.  Single nucleotide polymorphisms in microRNA binding sites of oncogenes: implications in cancer and pharmacogenomics.

Authors:  Mayakannan Manikandan; Arasambattu Kannan Munirajan
Journal:  OMICS       Date:  2013-11-28

Review 3.  Thyroid C-Cell Biology and Oncogenic Transformation.

Authors:  Gilbert J Cote; Elizabeth G Grubbs; Marie-Claude Hofmann
Journal:  Recent Results Cancer Res       Date:  2015

4.  Single nucleotide polymorphisms in microRNA binding sites: implications in colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Panchalee Bhaumik; Chandrasekhar Gopalakrishnan; Balu Kamaraj; Rituraj Purohit
Journal:  ScientificWorldJournal       Date:  2014-12-24

5.  Development of a High-Resolution Melting Analysis Method for CYP2C19*17 Genotyping in Healthy Volunteers.

Authors:  Zahra Ghasemi; Mehrdad Hashemi; Mahsa Ejabati; Seyyed Meisam Ebrahimi; Hamidreza Kheiri Manjili; Ali Sharafi; Ali Ramazani
Journal:  Avicenna J Med Biotechnol       Date:  2016 Oct-Dec

6.  Dominance from the perspective of gene-gene and gene-chemical interactions.

Authors:  Arkadiusz Gladki; Piotr Zielenkiewicz; Szymon Kaczanowski
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  2015-11-27       Impact factor: 1.082

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.