Literature DB >> 23032564

Lost food, wasted resources: global food supply chain losses and their impacts on freshwater, cropland, and fertiliser use.

M Kummu1, H de Moel, M Porkka, S Siebert, O Varis, P J Ward.   

Abstract

Reducing food losses and waste is considered to be one of the most promising measures to improve food security in the coming decades. Food losses also affect our use of resources, such as freshwater, cropland, and fertilisers. In this paper we estimate the global food supply losses due to lost and wasted food crops, and the resources used to produce them. We also quantify the potential food supply and resource savings that could be made by reducing food losses and waste. We used publically available global databases to conduct the study at the country level. We found that around one quarter of the produced food supply (614 kcal/cap/day) is lost within the food supply chain (FSC). The production of these lost and wasted food crops accounts for 24% of total freshwater resources used in food crop production (27 m(3)/cap/yr), 23% of total global cropland area (31 × 10(-3)ha/cap/yr), and 23% of total global fertiliser use (4.3 kg/cap/yr). The per capita use of resources for food losses is largest in North Africa & West-Central Asia (freshwater and cropland) and North America & Oceania (fertilisers). The smallest per capita use of resources for food losses is found in Sub-Saharan Africa (freshwater and fertilisers) and in Industrialised Asia (cropland). Relative to total food production, the smallest food supply and resource losses occur in South & Southeast Asia. If the lowest loss and waste percentages achieved in any region in each step of the FSC could be reached globally, food supply losses could be halved. By doing this, there would be enough food for approximately one billion extra people. Reducing the food losses and waste would thus be an important step towards increased food security, and would also increase the efficiency of resource use in food production.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23032564     DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2012.08.092

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Total Environ        ISSN: 0048-9697            Impact factor:   7.963


  58 in total

1.  Resilience and reactivity of global food security.

Authors:  Samir Suweis; Joel A Carr; Amos Maritan; Andrea Rinaldo; Paolo D'Odorico
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-05-11       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 2.  A systems approach to assessing environmental and economic effects of food loss and waste interventions in the United States.

Authors:  Mary K Muth; Catherine Birney; Amanda Cuéllar; Steven M Finn; Mark Freeman; James N Galloway; Isabella Gee; Jessica Gephart; Kristal Jones; Linda Low; Ellen Meyer; Quentin Read; Travis Smith; Keith Weitz; Sarah Zoubek
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2019-06-17       Impact factor: 7.963

3.  Assessing the environmental impacts of halving food loss and waste along the food supply chain.

Authors:  Quentin D Read; Samuel Brown; Amanda D Cuéllar; Steven M Finn; Jessica A Gephart; Landon T Marston; Ellen Meyer; Keith A Weitz; Mary K Muth
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2019-12-30       Impact factor: 7.963

4.  Multi-metric Ecosystem Health Assessment of Three Inland Water Bodies in South-west, Nigeria, with Varying Levels of Sand Mining Activities and Heavy Metal Pollution.

Authors:  Prince Emeka Ndimele; Fatai Gbolahan Owodeinde; Abdullatif Olufemi Giwa-Ajeniya; Bridget Adekemi Moronkola; Oyindamola Roseline Adaramoye; Lois Oyindamola Ewenla; Hijrah Yetunde Kushoro
Journal:  Biol Trace Elem Res       Date:  2021-09-10       Impact factor: 3.738

5.  A world of co-benefits: Solving the global nitrogen challenge.

Authors:  Benjamin Z Houlton; Maya Almaraz; Viney Aneja; Amy T Austin; Edith Bai; Kenneth G Cassman; Jana E Compton; Eric A Davidson; Jan Willem Erisman; James N Galloway; Baojing Gu; Guolin Yao; Luiz A Martinelli; Kate Scow; William H Schlesinger; Thomas P Tomich; Chao Wang; Xin Zhang
Journal:  Earths Future       Date:  2019       Impact factor: 7.495

6.  Untangling the complexity of diseases such as calf diarrhoea is crucial to future productivity.

Authors:  Timothy J Mahony
Journal:  Vet J       Date:  2015-11-17       Impact factor: 2.688

7.  Which practices co-deliver food security, climate change mitigation and adaptation, and combat land degradation and desertification?

Authors:  Pete Smith; Katherine Calvin; Johnson Nkem; Donovan Campbell; Francesco Cherubini; Giacomo Grassi; Vladimir Korotkov; Anh Le Hoang; Shuaib Lwasa; Pamela McElwee; Ephraim Nkonya; Nobuko Saigusa; Jean-Francois Soussana; Miguel Angel Taboada; Frances C Manning; Dorothy Nampanzira; Cristina Arias-Navarro; Matteo Vizzarri; Jo House; Stephanie Roe; Annette Cowie; Mark Rounsevell; Almut Arneth
Journal:  Glob Chang Biol       Date:  2019-12-14       Impact factor: 13.211

8.  Which diet has the lower water footprint in Mediterranean countries?

Authors:  Davy Vanham; Susann Guenther; Marta Ros-Baró; Anna Bach-Faig
Journal:  Resour Conserv Recycl       Date:  2021-08       Impact factor: 10.204

9.  Yield Trends Are Insufficient to Double Global Crop Production by 2050.

Authors:  Deepak K Ray; Nathaniel D Mueller; Paul C West; Jonathan A Foley
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-06-19       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 10.  Land system change and food security: towards multi-scale land system solutions.

Authors:  Peter H Verburg; Ole Mertz; Karl-Heinz Erb; Helmut Haberl; Wenbin Wu
Journal:  Curr Opin Environ Sustain       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 6.984

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.