Literature DB >> 23032191

Femoral version of the general population: does "normal" vary by gender or ethnicity?

John D Koerner1, Neeraj M Patel, Richard S Yoon, Michael S Sirkin, Mark C Reilly, Frank A Liporace.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to compare various gender and ethnic groups to characterize differences in baseline version and rates of retroversion.
DESIGN: Retrospective.
SETTING: Level 1 trauma center. PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS: Between 2000 and 2009, 417 consecutive patients with femur fractures were treated with an intramedullary nail at level I trauma and tertiary referral center. Of these, 328 with computed tomography scanogram of the normal, uninjured contralateral femur were included in this study. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Femoral version.
RESULTS: The mean alignment for the all patients was 8.84 ± 9.66° of anteversion. There were no statistically significant differences in mean version between African American, white, and Hispanic patients for males or females. Although there were also no significant differences in rates between ethnicities, retroversion was found to be common in white males (21.4%), African American males (15.1%), and all groups of females (>14.3%). Furthermore, nearly 6% of both African American males and females exhibited >10° retroversion.
CONCLUSIONS: Although there may not be a significant difference in average femoral version between ethnic and gender groups, retroversion is relatively common, and retroversion >10° was observed in nearly 6% of the African American population. This may have important implications in proper alignment restoration and successful clinical outcomes after intramedullary nailing of femur fractures.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23032191     DOI: 10.1097/BOT.0b013e3182693fdd

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orthop Trauma        ISSN: 0890-5339            Impact factor:   2.512


  21 in total

1.  Differences in Femoral Torsion Among Various Measurement Methods Increase in Hips With Excessive Femoral Torsion.

Authors:  Florian Schmaranzer; Till D Lerch; Klaus A Siebenrock; Moritz Tannast; Simon D Steppacher
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2019-05       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Analysis of acetabular orientation and femoral anteversion using images of three-dimensional reconstructed bone models.

Authors:  Jaeyeong Park; Jun-Young Kim; Hyun Deok Kim; Young Cheol Kim; Anna Seo; Minkyu Je; Jong Uk Mun; Bia Kim; Il Hyung Park; Shin-Yoon Kim
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2017-01-06       Impact factor: 2.924

3.  New combined anteversion technique in hybrid THA: cup-first procedure with CT-based navigation.

Authors:  Yoshinobu Masumoto; Shigeo Fukunishi; Tomokazu Fukui; Shinichi Yoshiya; Shoji Nishio; Yuki Fujihara; Shohei Okahisa; Taishi Okada; Makoto Kanto; Ariha Goshi; Futoshi Morio; Yu Takeda
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2019-11-08

4.  Functional Femoral Anteversion: Axial Rotation of the Femur and its Implications for Stem Version Targets in Total Hip Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Max Hardwick-Morris; Joshua Twiggs; Kunaal Kacker; Brad Miles; Jitendra Balakumar
Journal:  Arthroplast Today       Date:  2022-10-12

Review 5.  [Torsional deformities of the femur in patients with femoroacetabular impingement : Dynamic 3D impingement simulation can be helpful for the planning of surgical hip dislocation and hip arthroscopy].

Authors:  Till D Lerch; Florian Schmaranzer; Markus S Hanke; Christiane Leibold; Simon D Steppacher; Klaus A Siebenrock; Moritz Tannast
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2020-06       Impact factor: 1.087

6.  How Common Is Femoral Retroversion and How Is it Affected by Different Measurement Methods in Unilateral Slipped Capital Femoral Epiphysis?

Authors:  Florian Schmaranzer; Jennifer R Kallini; Mariana G Ferrer; Patricia E Miller; James D Wylie; Young-Jo Kim; Eduardo N Novais
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2021-05-01       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  Is Cam Morphology Found in Ancient and Medieval Populations in Addition to Modern Populations?

Authors:  Bartosz Jan Musielak; Anna Maria Kubicka; Łukasz Woźniak; Marek Jóźwiak; Raymond W Liu
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2021-08-01       Impact factor: 4.755

8.  Femoral version, neck-shaft angle, and acetabular anteversion in Chinese Han population: a retrospective analysis of 466 healthy adults.

Authors:  Nan Jiang; Lin Peng; Mohammed Al-Qwbani; Guo-Ping Xie; Qin-Meng Yang; Yu Chai; Qing Zhang; Bin Yu
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 1.889

9.  Hip contact stress and femoral neck retroversion: a biomechanical study to evaluate implication of femoroacetabular impingement.

Authors:  Jibanananda Satpathy; Arun Kannan; John R Owen; Jennifer S Wayne; Jason R Hull; William A Jiranek
Journal:  J Hip Preserv Surg       Date:  2015-06-13

10.  Significant differences in femoral torsion values depending on the CT measurement technique.

Authors:  Peter Kaiser; René Attal; Mark Kammerer; Michael Thauerer; Lea Hamberger; Raul Mayr; Werner Schmoelz
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2016-08-08       Impact factor: 3.067

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.