OBJECTIVE: Vaccination provides the most effective protection against maternal, fetal and neonatal complications of influenza infection. This study aimed to determine the uptake rate of influenza vaccination including 2009 pandemic H1N1 influenza and seasonal influenza vaccination and the reasons for acceptance or rejection among pregnant women. RESULT: Mean age of the 416 pregnant women enrolled in this study was 27.06 ± 5.27 y. Only 25 (6%) of 397 women had history of vaccination. Of 383 (92.06%) pregnant women who had rejected vaccination, 116 (30.28%) declared that they lacked information about influenza vaccination and 44 (11.48%) felt that they did not need vaccination. Concerns about the safety of influenza vaccination were reported by only 2 women (0.52%). Of the 25 (6%) pregnant women who were vaccinated against influenza, 15 (60%) accepted because of advice they received from persons other than physicians, 5 (20%) believed that influenza vaccination is necessary for everyone, and 3 (12%) accepted because of a history of frequent influenza virus infections in previous years. METHOD: This questionnaire based study was conducted at obstetrics and maternity hospitals affiliated with Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran. Pregnant women were interviewed individually and privately. SPSS was used for data analysis. CONCLUSION: Most of the unvaccinated and vaccinated pregnant women lacked sufficient knowledge about influenza. Education of pregnant women about influenza vaccination and encouragement from physicians may have a remarkable effect on turning poor compliance into high flu vaccination uptake among pregnant women.
OBJECTIVE: Vaccination provides the most effective protection against maternal, fetal and neonatal complications of influenza infection. This study aimed to determine the uptake rate of influenza vaccination including 2009 pandemic H1N1influenza and seasonal influenza vaccination and the reasons for acceptance or rejection among pregnant women. RESULT: Mean age of the 416 pregnant women enrolled in this study was 27.06 ± 5.27 y. Only 25 (6%) of 397 women had history of vaccination. Of 383 (92.06%) pregnant women who had rejected vaccination, 116 (30.28%) declared that they lacked information about influenza vaccination and 44 (11.48%) felt that they did not need vaccination. Concerns about the safety of influenza vaccination were reported by only 2 women (0.52%). Of the 25 (6%) pregnant women who were vaccinated against influenza, 15 (60%) accepted because of advice they received from persons other than physicians, 5 (20%) believed that influenza vaccination is necessary for everyone, and 3 (12%) accepted because of a history of frequent influenza virus infections in previous years. METHOD: This questionnaire based study was conducted at obstetrics and maternity hospitals affiliated with Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran. Pregnant women were interviewed individually and privately. SPSS was used for data analysis. CONCLUSION: Most of the unvaccinated and vaccinated pregnant women lacked sufficient knowledge about influenza. Education of pregnant women about influenza vaccination and encouragement from physicians may have a remarkable effect on turning poor compliance into high flu vaccination uptake among pregnant women.
Authors: Sophia Tan; David L Gordon; Yoshikazu Honda-Okubo; Nikolai Petrovsky; Peter Phillips; Sandra Huddleston; Tania A Sadlon Journal: J Infect Date: 2011-03-21 Impact factor: 6.072
Authors: Andreea A Creanga; Laurie Kamimoto; Kimberly Newsome; Tiffany D'Mello; Denise J Jamieson; Marianne E Zotti; Kathryn E Arnold; Joan Baumbach; Nancy M Bennett; Monica M Farley; Ken Gershman; David Kirschke; Ruth Lynfield; James Meek; Craig Morin; Arthur Reingold; Patricia Ryan; William Schaffner; Ann Thomas; Shelley Zansky; Lyn Finelli; Margaret A Honein Journal: Am J Obstet Gynecol Date: 2011-04-20 Impact factor: 8.661
Authors: Indu B Ahluwalia; James A Singleton; Denise J Jamieson; Sonja A Rasmussen; Leslie Harrison Journal: J Womens Health (Larchmt) Date: 2011-03-25 Impact factor: 2.681
Authors: R L Puleston; G Bugg; K Hoschler; J Konje; J Thornton; I Stephenson; P Myles; J Enstone; G Augustine; Y Davis; M Zambon; K G Nicholson; J S Nguyen-Van-Tam Journal: Health Technol Assess Date: 2010-12 Impact factor: 4.014
Authors: Barbra M Fisher; Janice Scott; Jan Hart; Virginia D Winn; Ronald S Gibbs; Anne M Lynch Journal: Am J Obstet Gynecol Date: 2011-02-22 Impact factor: 8.661
Authors: Sonja A Rasmussen; Dmitry M Kissin; Lorraine F Yeung; Kitty MacFarlane; Susan Y Chu; Reina M Turcios-Ruiz; Elizabeth W Mitchell; Jennifer Williams; Alicia M Fry; Jeffrey Hageman; Timothy M Uyeki; Denise J Jamieson Journal: Am J Obstet Gynecol Date: 2011-02-18 Impact factor: 8.661
Authors: Kerry-Ann F O'Grady; Melissa Dunbar; Linda G Medlin; Kerry K Hall; Maree Toombs; Judith Meiklejohn; Lisa McHugh; Peter D Massey; Amy Creighton; Ross M Andrews Journal: BMC Res Notes Date: 2015-04-29
Authors: Mamunur R Malik; Abdinasir Abubakar; Amgad E Kholy; Evans Buliva; Wasiq M Khan; Jaya Lamichhane; Ann Moen; Margaret McCarron; Kinda Zureick; Majdouline Obtel Journal: J Infect Public Health Date: 2019-09-13 Impact factor: 3.718