Literature DB >> 23031063

Evaluation and optimization of administered activity, scanning parameters and hydration at (99m) Tc hydroxymethylene diphosphonate adult whole-body bone imaging.

Sven-Åke Starck1, Lene Rosendahl.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To find out the method of optimal activity administration and scanning parameters to fulfil guidelines and diagnostic reference levels and to reach a maximal contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) in bone imaging. We also investigate the influence on CNR and bladder activity in well-hydrated patients.
METHODS: A total of 225 patients were included. The first group of 101 patients was used to find out the optimal method to administer activity in terms of optimized CNR. The next two groups with 62 patients each were hydrated with 1500 ml water in two different time periods. CNR, bladder area and content were calculated.
RESULTS: An administrated activity per metre body height gave the highest CNR (5·43). A standard activity had the lowest percentage (2%) of images with < 1·5 million counts. Early hydration decreased CNR from 5·41 to 4·85 (P = 0·06), with late hydration to 5·29 (NS). Studies with too few pulses were increased from 2 to 11% to a level of 15-26% and 11-21%, respectively. Early hydration reduced the bladder activity from 20·7 to 10·1 MBq (P< 0·01), late hydration to 14·8 MBq (P = 0·08). The bladder size was enlarged from the no hydrated group (1406 mm(2) ) to the early hydrated group (2406 mm(2) , P< 0·000) and between the early and late hydrated group (3183 mm(2) , P< 0·05).
CONCLUSION: A standard activity in sufficient quantity is the most practical method, in addition to have the lowest percentage of images with too few pulses. A high fluid intake is not recommended because of problems with disturbing bladder content.
© 2012 The Authors Clinical Physiology and Functional Imaging © 2012 Scandinavian Society of Clinical Physiology and Nuclear Medicine.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23031063     DOI: 10.1111/j.1475-097X.2012.01145.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Physiol Funct Imaging        ISSN: 1475-0961            Impact factor:   2.273


  3 in total

1.  Reply to: Starck et al.

Authors:  Tim Van den Wyngaert; Frédéric Paycha
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 9.236

2.  Comments on Van den Wyngaert et al., The EANM practice guidelines for bone scintigraphy.

Authors:  Sven-Åke Starck; Lene Rosendahl
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2016-08-25       Impact factor: 9.236

3.  A multicentre simulation study of planar whole-body bone scintigraphy in Sweden.

Authors:  Agnetha Gustafsson; Eva Örndahl; David Minarik; Kerstin Cederholm; Sophia Frantz; Jessica Hagerman; Lena Johansson; Johan Fredén Lindqvist; Cathrine Jonsson
Journal:  EJNMMI Phys       Date:  2022-02-14
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.