Literature DB >> 23030525

Fundamental questions before recording or measuring functioning and disability.

Ros Madden1, Nicola Fortune, Danielle Cheeseman, Elias Mpofu, Anita Bundy.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: This paper seeks to contribute to thoughtful description, recording and measurement of functioning, by discussing some fundamental questions to consider before starting, framed as: why, what, how and who.
METHOD: Generic literature on measurement methods and the more specialised literature on application of the ICF over the last decade inform the consideration of these questions. The context of recording or measurement is examined, including the moral and legal framework of the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (UNCRPD) and the technical framework of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF).
RESULTS: Whatever the setting in which describing, recording or measuring is being undertaken - in policy development, service planning and management, clinical management or population health monitoring - determining the purpose is the key starting point. Purpose (why) frames the consideration of content (what), method (how) and source (who). Many generic measurement methods can be applied in the disability field, but there are challenges particular to the field. The perspectives of people with disabilities and "patients" require consideration, especially with the trend to person-centred care and the social justice principles emanating from the UNCRPD.
CONCLUSIONS: Considering these basic questions is a pre-requisite to meaningful recording and measurement of functioning and disability. Future challenges include: incorporating environmental factors into measurement; setting thresholds on the disability spectrum; and combining the views of the person concerned with those of various professionals.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23030525     DOI: 10.3109/09638288.2012.720350

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Disabil Rehabil        ISSN: 0963-8288            Impact factor:   3.033


  6 in total

1.  In search of an integrative measure of functioning.

Authors:  Rosamond H Madden; Nick Glozier; Nicola Fortune; Maree Dyson; John Gilroy; Anita Bundy; Gwynnyth Llewellyn; Luis Salvador-Carulla; Sue Lukersmith; Elias Mpofu; Richard Madden
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2015-05-26       Impact factor: 3.390

2.  Which environmental factors are associated with lived health when controlling for biological health? - a multilevel analysis.

Authors:  Cristina Bostan; Cornelia Oberhauser; Gerold Stucki; Jerome Bickenbach; Alarcos Cieza
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2015-05-27       Impact factor: 3.295

3.  Evaluation of the internal construct validity of the Personal Care Participation Assessment and Resource Tool (PC-PART) using Rasch analysis.

Authors:  Susan Darzins; Christine Imms; Marilyn Di Stefano; Nicholas F Taylor; Julie F Pallant
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2014-11-05       Impact factor: 2.655

4.  The UNICEF/Washington Group Child Functioning Module-Accuracy, Inter-Rater Reliability and Cut-Off Level for Disability Disaggregation of Fiji's Education Management Information System.

Authors:  Beth Sprunt; Barbara McPake; Manjula Marella
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2019-03-05       Impact factor: 3.390

5.  Responsiveness, construct and criterion validity of the Personal Care-Participation Assessment and Resource Tool (PC-PART).

Authors:  Susan W Darzins; Christine Imms; Nora Shields; Nicholas F Taylor
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2015-08-12       Impact factor: 3.186

Review 6.  Capturing patients' needs in casemix: a systematic literature review on the value of adding functioning information in reimbursement systems.

Authors:  Maren Hopfe; Gerold Stucki; Ric Marshall; Conal D Twomey; T Bedirhan Üstün; Birgit Prodinger
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2016-02-03       Impact factor: 2.655

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.