| Literature DB >> 23029558 |
Jin-Wei Cheng1, Shi-Wei Cheng, Xiao-Ye Ma, Ji-Ping Cai, You Li, Guo-Cai Lu, Rui-Li Wei.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Glaucoma is the leading cause of irreversible blindness in the world. Recent evidence indicates a role for genetic susceptibility to primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG). The relation between myocilin polymorphisms and POAG susceptibility has been studied in different populations.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2012 PMID: 23029558 PMCID: PMC3460926 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0046632
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Figure 1Flow diagram of study selection.
Characteristics of publications included in meta-analysis of myocilin polymorphism and POAG.
| Reference | Country | Ethnicity | Patients | Controls | No. (case/control) |
| Alward 1998 | Iowa; Australia; US | Caucasian | POAG (HTG) | General population and healthy participants | 716/596 |
| Yoon 1999 | Korea | Asian | POAG (HTG) | Non-glaucoma participants | 45/106 |
| Fingert 1999 | Iowa; Australia; US; Canada; Japan | Caucasian; African; Asian | POAG (HTG) | General population and healthy participants | 1693/793 |
| Kubota 2000 | Japan | Asian | POAG (HTG and NTG) | Non-glaucoma participants | 140/100 |
| Lam 2000 | China | Asian | POAG (HTG) | Non-glaucoma participants | 91/132 |
| Vázquez 2000 | Spain | Caucasian | POAG (HTG) | General population | 79/90 |
| Mabuchi 2001 | Japan | Asian | POAG (HTG and NTG) | Non-glaucoma participants | 233/100 |
| Mataftsi 2001 | Switzerland | Caucasian | POAG (HTG and NTG) | Non-glaucoma participants | 117/50 |
| Fan 2002 | China | Asian | POAG (HTG) | Non-glaucoma participants | 82/150 |
| Faucher 2002 | Canada | Caucasian | POAG (HTG) | General population and healthy participants | 293/107 |
| Hulsman 2002 | Netherlands | Caucasian | POAG (HTG and NTG) | Non-glaucoma participants | 50/100 |
| Mukhopadhyay 2002 | India | Asian | POAG (HTG) | Non-glaucoma participants | 56/51 |
| Pang 2002 | China | Asian | POAG (HTG) | Non-glaucoma participants | 201/388 |
| Izumi 2003 | Japan | Asian | POAG (NTG) | Non-glaucoma participants | 80/100 |
| Jansson 2003 | Sweden | Caucasian | POAG (HTG) | Non-glaucoma participants | 200/200 |
| Melki 2003a | France | Caucasian | POAG (HTG and NTG) | Healthy participants | 237/108 |
| Melki 2003b | Morocco | Caucasian | POAG (HTG) | General population | 57/60 |
| Fan 2004a | China | Asian | POAG (HTG) | Non-glaucoma participants | 157/155 |
| Fan 2004b | China | Asian | POAG (HTG) | Non-glaucoma participants | 32/96 |
| Ishikawa 2004 | Japan | Asian | POAG (HTG) | Healthy participants | 171/100 |
| Fan 2005 | China | Asian | POAG (HTG and NTG) | Non-glaucoma participants | 400/281 |
| Rakhmanov 2005 | Russia | Caucasian | POAG (HTG and NTG) | Non-glaucoma participants | 170/100 |
| Funayama 2006 | Japan | Asian | POAG (HTG and NTG) | Non-glaucoma participants | 532/240 |
| Yao 2006 | China | Asian | POAG (HTG and NTG) | Non-glaucoma participants | 142/77 |
| Bhattacharjee 2007 | India | Asian | POAG (HTG) | General population and non-glaucoma participants | 315/100 |
| Kumar 2007 | India | Asian | POAG (HTG and NTG) | Healthy participants | 251/100 |
| Lopez-Martinez 2007 | Spain | Caucasian | POAG (HTG) | Healthy participants | 110/98 |
| Yen 2007 | China | Asian | POAG (HTG) | Healthy participants | 48/100 |
| Bayat 2008 | Iran | Caucasian | POAG (HTG) | Healthy participants | 23/100 |
| Jia 2009 | China | Asian | POAG (HTG) | Non-glaucoma participants | 176/200 |
| Chen 2011 | China | Asian | POAG (HTG) | Non-glaucoma participants | 118/150 |
| Whigham 2011 | US | African | POAG (HTG and NTG) | Non-glaucoma participants | 113/131 |
POAG: primary open angle glaucoma; HTG: high-tension glaucoma; NTG: normal-tension glaucoma.
Figure 2Meta-analysis of the association between primary open-angle glaucoma and myocilin Q368X mutation.
Summary odds ratios from the meta-analysis of the association between primary open-angle glaucoma and myocilin polymorphisms.
| Polymorphism and subgroup | No. of studies | Event/Total (%) | Odds ratios (95% CI) | Test for heterogeneity | Test for overall effect | |
| Case | Control | |||||
|
| ||||||
| All | 9 | 69/3820 (1.8) | 4/2144 (0.2) | 4.68 (2.02, 10.85) | X2 = 4.974, P = 0.760, I2 = 0.00% | Z = 3.598, P = 0.000 |
| Africans | 1 | 1/312 (0.3) | 0/90 (0.0) | 0.87 (0.04, 21.58) | X2 = 0.000, P = 1.000, I2 = 0.00% | Z = −0.084, P = 0.933 |
| Asians | 1 | 2/315 (0.6) | 0/100 (0.0) | 1.60 (0.08, 33.67) | X2 = 0.000, P = 1.000, I2 = 0.00% | Z = 0.304, P = 0.761 |
| Caucasians | 8 | 66/3086 (2.1) | 4/1905 (0.2) | 5.17 (2.16, 12.40) | X2 = 4.563, P = 0.713, I2 = 0.00% | Z = 3.680, P = 0.000 |
| HTG | 7 | 52/3446 (1.5) | 4/1986 (0.2) | 4.26 (1.69, 10.73) | X2 = 4.467, P = 0.614, I2 = 0.00% | Z = 3.076, P = 0.002 |
|
| ||||||
| All | 12 | 44/3452 (1.3) | 25/2609 (1.0) | 2.17 (1.32, 3.57) | X2 = 6.308, P = 0.852, I2 = 0.00% | Z = 3.041, P = 0.002 |
| Asian | 12 | 44/3452 (1.3) | 25/2609 (1.0) | 2.17 (1.32, 3.57) | X2 = 6.310, P = 0.852, I2 = 0.00% | Z = 3.040, P = 0.002 |
| NTG | 2 | 3/154 (1.9) | 5/358 (1.5) | 1.58 (0.40, 6.22) | X2 = 0.548, P = 0.459, I2 = 0.00% | Z = 0.656, P = 0.512 |
| HTG | 12 | 42/3298 (1.3) | 25/2609 (1.0) | 2.26 (1.37, 3.72) | X2 = 5.989, P = 0.874, I2 = 0.00% | Z = 3.176, P = 0.001 |
|
| ||||||
| All | 11 | 174/3715 (4.7) | 85/2164 (3.9) | 1.20 (0.91, 1.57) | X2 = 3.719, P = 0.959, I2 = 0.00% | Z = 1.304, P = 0.192 |
| Africans | 2 | 8/425 (1.9) | 2/221 (0.9) | 1.37 (0.24, 7.88) | X2 = 0.857, P = 0.355, I2 = 0.00% | Z = 0.348, P = 0.728 |
| Asians | 2 | 9/457 (2.0) | 0/177 (0.0) | 3.24 (0.38, 27.46) | X2 = 0.308, P = 0.579, I2 = 0.00% | Z = 1.079, P = 0.281 |
| Caucasians | 8 | 157/2736 (5.7) | 83/1717 (4.8) | 1.19 (0.91, 1.57) | X2 = 2.057, P = 0.957, I2 = 0.00% | Z = 1.259, P = 0.208 |
| NTG | 2 | 3/68 (4.4) | 7/177 (4.0) | 1.89 (0.44, 8.23) | X2 = 0.421, P = 0.516, I2 = 0.00% | Z = 0.852, P = 0.394 |
| HTG | 6 | 157/3041 (5.2) | 77/1747 (4.4) | 1.22 (0.92, 1.63) | X2 = 2.522, P = 0.773, I2 = 0.00% | Z = 1.393, P = 0.164 |
|
| ||||||
| All | 23 | 769/5371 (14.3) | 608/3340 (18.2) | 0.86 (0.69, 1.08) | X2 = 45.281, P = 0.002, I2 = 51.42% | Z = −1.319, P = 0.187 |
| Africans | 2 | 1/425 (0.2) | 1/221 (0.5) | 0.58 (0.06, 5.59) | X2 = 0.126, P = 0.723, I2 = 0.00% | Z = −0.473, P = 0.636 |
| Asians | 16 | 613/2999 (20.4) | 461/2301 (20.0) | 0.89 (0.75, 1.06) | X2 = 15.748, P = 0.399, I2 = 4.75% | Z = −1.339, P = 0.180 |
| Caucasians | 7 | 155/1947 (8.0) | 146/800 (18.3) | 0.62 (0.48, 0.81) | X2 = 44.682, P = 0.000, I2 = 86.57% | Z = −3.586, P = 0.000 |
| NTG | 5 | 64/625 (10.2) | 85/798 (10.7) | 1.19 (0.83, 1.73) | X2 = 4.586, P = 0.332, I2 = 12.78% | Z = 0.939, P = 0.348 |
| HTG | 17 | 559/4092 (13.7) | 474/2701 (17.5) | 0.84 (0.65, 1.08) | X2 = 37.401, P = 0.002, I2 = 57.22% | Z = −1.355, P = 0.175 |
|
| ||||||
| All | 12 | 34/1826 (1.8) | 35/1884 (1.9) | 1.02 (0.61, 1.70) | X2 = 7.664, P = 0.743, I2 = 0.00% | Z = 0.073, P = 0.942 |
| Asians | 12 | 34/1826 (1.8) | 35/1884 (1.9) | 1.02 (0.61, 1.70) | X2 = 7.664, P = 0.743, I2 = 0.00% | Z = 0.073, P = 0.942 |
| NTG | 4 | 8/348 (2.3) | 8/558 (1.4) | 1.86 (0.60, 5.72) | X2 = 2.659, P = 0.447, I2 = 0.00% | Z = 1.080, P = 0.280 |
| HTG | 10 | 26/1359 (1.9) | 35/1684 (2.1) | 0.93 (0.55, 1.60) | X2 = 5.419, P = 0.796, I2 = 0.00% | Z = −0.250, P = 0.803 |
Figure 3Meta-analysis of the association between primary open-angle glaucoma and myocilin T353I mutation.