| Literature DB >> 23029393 |
Esther Merlini1, Kety Luzi, Elisa Suardi, Alessandra Barassi, Maddalena Cerrone, Javier Sánchez Martínez, Francesca Bai, Gian Vico Melzi D'Eril, Antonella D'Arminio Monforte, Giulia Marchetti.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: We investigated the potential relationship between T-cell phenotype, inflammation, endotoxemia, and atherosclerosis evaluated by carotid intima-media thickness (IMT) in a cohort of HIV-positive patients undergoing long-term virologically suppressive combination antiretroviral therapy (cART).Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2012 PMID: 23029393 PMCID: PMC3459872 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0046073
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Patients’ characteristics.
| Patients | nIMT | iIMT | Plaque | p | |
| n = 163 | n = 112 | n = 22 | n = 29 | ||
| Age (years) | 48 (43–54) | 46 (42–65) | 55 (46–68) | 50 (47–61) | 0.0001 |
| Sex (male) ° | 134 (82) | 90 (80) | 20 (91) | 23 (79) | 0.476 |
| Caucasian ° | 154 (94) | 104 (93) | 22 (100) | 27 (93) | 0.668 |
| Current IDUs ° | 47 (29) | 33 (29) | 5 (23) | 9 (21) | 0.776 |
| HCV Ab ° | 46 (28) | 28 (25) | 6 (27) | 12 (41) | 0.216 |
| HCV-RNA (IU/mL) | 754400 (17–2893000) | 461827 (3823–21890000) | 619701 (17–5305000) | 1842000 (14–3258000) | 0.707 |
| Cirrhosis (yes)° | 10 (6) | 5 (4) | 1 (4) | 4 (13) | 0.522 |
|
| |||||
| Years since HIV diagnosis | 12 (5–19) | 11.5 (5–19.7) | 14 (8.7–19.2) | 11 (5–19) | 0.79 |
| HAART° | 0.523 | ||||
|
| 56 (34) | 42 (37) | 6 (27) | 8 (27) | |
|
| 91 (56) | 61 (55) | 12 (55) | 18 (62) | |
|
| 16 (10) | 9 (8) | 4 (18) | 3 (11) | |
| Total years of HAART | 5 (2–11) | 4 (2–10) | 7 (3–9) | 5 (2–13) | 0.725 |
| NNRTI duration, (months) | 56.2 (16.6–96.5) | 44 (17–114) | 71 (39–119) | 59 (22–158) | 0.392 |
| NRTI duration, (months) | 53.3 (18.9–128.7) | 50 (15–95) | 59 (10–85) | 59 (27–109) | 0.525 |
| PI duration, (months) | 22.7 (12.9–111.6) | 20 (11–108) | 50 (19–56) | 29 (14–132) | 0.648 |
| Nadir CD4+ T-cells | 210 (99–326) | 216 (119–336) | 163 (50–308) | 198 (28–387) | 0.245 |
| (cells/uL) | |||||
| Current CD4+ T-(cells/uL) | 496 (358–718) | 500 (362–708) | 465 (328–577) | 512 (341–765) | 0.736 |
| Delta CD4+ T-cells | 276 (139–448) | 276 (128.5–435) | 258 (168–521) | 266 (167.2–395) | 0.87 |
| (cell/uL) | |||||
| Current HIV RNA | 1.59 | 1.59 | 1.59 | 1.59 | 0.18 |
| (Log 10 cp/mL) | |||||
|
| |||||
| Current smoking° | 78 (48) | 54 (48) | 11 (50) | 13 (45) | 0.919 |
| Hypertension ° | 26 (16) | 10 (9) | 8 (36) | 8 (27) | 0.001 |
| History of Coronary Disease ° | 8 (5) | 4 (4) | 2 (9) | 2 (7) | 0.473 |
| BMI | 24.6 (22.9–26.7) | 25 (23–26) | 25 (22–27) | 25 (23–27) | 0.828 |
| Framingham Score | 6 (2.2–11) | 4 (2–9) | 11 (6–16) | 8 (4.5–16) | 0.0001 |
|
| |||||
| Total Cholesterol, (mg/dL) | 190.5 (159–220) | 192 (159–221) | 168 (142–208) | 192 (173–208) | 0.44 |
| LDL Cholesterol, (mg/dL) | 111 (83–136.2) | 114 (86–138) | 89 (71–137) | 112 (92–131) | 0.564 |
| HDL Cholesterol, (mg/dL) | 43 (35–54) | 44 (35–54) | 37 (31–48) | 42 (36–52) | 0.274 |
| Triglycerides, (mg/dL) | 140 (160.2–194) | 137 (104–194) | 143 (110–211) | 158 (112–178) | 0.827 |
| Fasting glucose, (mg/dL) | 96 (88–104) | 95 (87–102) | 99 (89–113) | 96 (88–109) | 0.185 |
| HOMA-IR | 2.6 (1.6–4.6) | 2.2 (1.4–3.9) | 5 (1.5–12.3) | 3.5 (2.9–7.9) | 0.001 |
| Lipid-lowering therapy° | 40 (24) | 23 (21) | 7 (32) | 10 (34) | 0.219 |
NOTE: nIMT, normal intima-media thickness (IMT) ≤1 mm; iIMT, increased IMT (>1 mm and <1.5 mm); Plaque, IMT ≥1.5 mm at each site or a 50% increase for near-wall thickness >1.5 mm; IDUs, intravenous drug users; HAART, highly active antiretroviral therapy; NNRTI, non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors; NRTI, nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors; PI, protease inhibitor; Delta CD4, current CD4+ T-cell count – nadir CD4 T-cell count; LDL, low-density lipoprotein; HDL, high-density lipoprotein; BMI, body mass index; HOMA, homeostatic model assessment index.
Data are presented as medians (interquartile range). Kruskal-Wallis test.
°Data are presented as absolute numbers (percentages). Pearson’s Chi-square test.
Figure 1Different peripheral T-cell immune phenotypes according to the degree of carotid intima-media thickness.
A–B. Activated CD8+ T-cells were defined by the expression of CD38, whereas memory activated CD8+ T-cells were defined by the co-expression of CD45R0 and CD38. A. nIMT and pIMT HIV+ patients exhibited similar number of CD8+CD38+ T-cells. B. pIMT patients had significantly higher memory activated CD8+CD38+CD45R0+ T-cells in comparison to nIMT patients (p = .038). C–D. Apoptotic T-cells were defined by the expression of CD95 on CD4+ and CD8+ cells. As compared to nIMT, pIMT patients exhibited a significantly higher number of CD4+CD95+ cells (p = .01) (C), and CD8+CD95+ T-cells (p = .003) (D). E. CD127 expression on CD4+ T-cells was similar between the nIMT and pIMT groups. F. A non-significant trend towards greater number of CD8+CD127+ cells was observed among pIMT patients as compared to nIMT patients (p = .08).
Figure 2T-cell immunosenescence according to the degree of intima-media thickness.
A. A non-significant tendency towards reduced early differentiated memory (CD28+CD57−) CD4+ T-cell numbers was observed for pIMT patients in comparison to nIMT patients (p = .09). B. No differences were observed in early differentiated memory CD8+ CD28+CD57− T-cells between the two study groups. C–D. The number of late-differentiated memory (CD28–CD57+) CD4+ (C) and CD8+ (D) T-cells was comparable between nIMT and pIMT groups. E–F. We observed no difference in CD4+CD28+CD57+ (E) and CD8+CD28+CD57+ (F) T-cells between the nIMT and pIMT groups. G. No major difference in CD4+CD28–CD57− T-cells were observed between nIMT and pIMT patients. H. Compared to nIMT patients, pIMT patients tended to have lower number of CD8+CD28–CD57− cells (p = .06).
Figure 3Markers of Inflammation, endothelial cell activation, microbial translocation and anti-CMV IgG according to the degree of intima-media thickness.
A. IL-6 plasma levels were increased in pIMT patients in comparison to nIMT patients, albeit not-reaching significance (p = .08). B–F. When nIMT patients were compared to pIMT patients, no differences in TNF-α (B), s-VCAM-1 (C) hs-C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) (D) plasma levels were detected. E. nIMT and pIMT patients exhibited similar plasma levels of lipopolysaccharide (LPS). F. pIMT patients showed significantly higher circulating levels of sCD14 in comparison to nIMT patients (p = .046). G. nIMT and pIMT patients displayed comparable levels of anti-CMV IgG.
Regression models to explore independent factors associated with intima-media thickness (pIMT).
|
| Univariate | Multivariate | Multivariate | ||||||
| Beta | 95%CI | p | Beta | 95%CI | p | Beta | 95%CI | p | |
| Framingham risk score | 1.137 | 1.070–1.208 |
| 1.133 | 1.055–1.216 |
| 1.134 | 1.052–1.222 |
|
| (each unit more) | |||||||||
| PI exposure | 1.054 | 0.978–1.137 | 0.169 | 0.986 | 0.884–1.099 | 0.795 | |||
| (each year more) | |||||||||
| HOMA-IR | 1.170 | 1.075–1.274 |
| 1.150 | 1.048–1.261 |
| 1.146 | 1.041–1.261 |
|
| (each unit more) | |||||||||
| CD4+T-cell count | 1.000 | 0.998–1.001 | 0.694 | 1.000 | 0.998–1.002 | 0.761 | |||
| (each cell/mmc more) | |||||||||
| sCD14 ug/mL | 1.097 | 1.003–1.198 |
| 1.089 | 0.981–1.208 | 0.110 | 1.085 | 0.969–1.215 | 0.156 |
| (each unit more) | |||||||||
| CD8+CD38+ % | 0.992 | 0.941–1.045 | 0.755 | 1.037 | 0.953–1.128 | 0.404 | |||
| (each unit more) | |||||||||
| CD8+CD45R0+CD38+ % | 0.997 | 0.978–1.017 | 0.791 | 0.992 | 0.965–1.019 | 0.549 | |||
| (each unit more) | |||||||||
| CD4+CD95+ % | 1.085 | 0.998–1.179 |
| 1.060 | 0.952–1.181 | 0.285 | |||
| (each unit more) | |||||||||
| CD8+CD127+ % | 1.025 | 0.980–1.072 | 0.275 | 1.020 | 0.959–1.084 | 0.528 | |||
| (each unit more) | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| Framingham risk score | 0.322 | 0.006–0.018 |
| 0.336 | 0.006–0.012 |
| 0.312 | 0.006–0.018 |
|
| (each unit more) | |||||||||
| PI exposure | 0.186 | 0.002–0.018 |
| 0.096 | −0.003–0.014 | 0.239 | |||
| (each year more) | |||||||||
| HOMA-IR | 0.271 | 0.006–0.021 |
| 0.211 | 0.003–0.018 |
| 0.190 | 0.002–0.017 |
|
| (each unit more) | |||||||||
| CD4+T-cell count | −0.111 | 0.000–0.000 | 0.166 | −0.048 | 0.000–0.000 | 0.587 | |||
| (each cell/mmc more) | |||||||||
| sCD14 ug/mL | 0.108 | −0.003–0.016 | 0.197 | 0.056 | −0.006–0.012 | 0.478 | 0.042 | −0.007–0.012 | 0.608 |
| (each unit more) | |||||||||
| CD8+CD38+ % | 0.028 | −0.005–0.007 | 0.729 | 0.149 | −0.001–0.018 | 0.064 | |||
| (each unit more) | |||||||||
| CD8+CD45R0+CD38+ % | −0.028 | −0.002–0.002 | 0.727 | −0.115 | −0.003–0.000 | 0.105 | |||
| (each unit more) | |||||||||
| CD4+CD95+ % | 0.224 | 0.004–0.022 |
| 0.130 | −0.002–0.016 | 0.105 | |||
| (each unit more) | |||||||||
| CD8+CD127+ % | −0.025 | −0.006–0.004 | 0.758 | −0.072 | −0.007–0.003 | 0.357 | |||
| (each unit more) | |||||||||
Logistic regression model: pathological intima-media thickness (pIMT) defined as IMT>1 mm analysed as categorical variable.
Linear regression model: mean IMT analysed as a continuous variable –plaque excluded from the analysis.
NOTE: HAART, highly active antiretroviral therapy; PI, protease inhibitors; HOMA-IR, homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance.
OR, odds ratio – AOR, adjusted odds ratio.
Adjusted for Framingham risk score and HOMA-IR;
Mutually adjusted for all of the parameters tested in the univariate model.