| Literature DB >> 23029048 |
Emily S J Rauschert1, Katriona Shea.
Abstract
The successful establishment of invasive species has been shown to depend on aspects of the invaded community, such as gap characteristics. Biotic resistance may be particularly critical for stopping invaders at early life history stages, but new species can often invade following disturbances, which may create microsites with very different characteristics than are usually present. We examine the response of two invasive thistle species, Carduus nutans L. and C. acanthoides L., to three different microsite characteristics: disturbance type, size, and water availability. The two species initially responded differently to the type of disturbance: C. acanthoides had higher emergence and survival in plots with both above- and belowground disturbance, whereas C. nutans had better early performance in large microsites with above-ground disturbance only. Later in their life cycle, C. nutans performed better in plots that had been disturbed both above- and belowground, whereas C. acanthoides was largely unaffected by disturbance type. Increased emergence and survival, larger size and a higher proportion flowering were observed in larger gaps for both species throughout the life cycle. Watering had a negative impact on C. nutans emergence and fall survival and on C. acanthoides survival to the following summer. Overall, these results suggest that disturbance-generated microsite characteristics (disturbance type and size) may have large impacts on establishment of these two Carduus species, which in turn may persist well beyond the initial stages of growth. Studying invader responses to disturbance can help us to understand under what circumstances they are likely to establish and create persistent problems; avoiding or ameliorating such situations will have significant management benefits.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2012 PMID: 23029048 PMCID: PMC3445518 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0045490
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Figure 1Effect of microsite area on fall emergence and survival of Carduus nutans and C. acanthoides.
Panels a and b show the combined emergence and survival response for C. nutans and C. acanthoides (darker blue indicates full disturbance, lighter bars indicate clipped areas). Emergence and survival are generally higher in larger microsites. For C. acanthoides, performance was better in fully disturbed microsites. Carduus nutans did better in larger clipped microsites but smaller fully disturbed microsites.
Figure 2Effect of microsite area and type of disturbance on rosette size in fall.
Panels a and b show that rosettes were larger in larger microsites for both species in the fall (darker blue indicates full disturbance, lighter bars indicate clipped areas). For Carduus acanthoides, rosettes are larger in fully disturbed plots.
Figure 3The response of the proportion of thistles present to microsite size.
Both species were more likely to flower in larger microsites (darker blue indicates full disturbance, lighter bars indicate clipped areas). For C. acanthoides, the effect of disturbance type is not significant. No C. acanthoides individuals flowered in clipped 225 cm2 microsites.
Carduus nutans and C. acanthoides fall emergence and growth response to microsite characteristics.
|
|
| ||||
| Explanatory variable | Coefficient | p- value | Coefficient | p- value | |
| Emergence and fall survival in clipped plots | Intercept | –1.15 | |||
| Area | 0.64 | 0.00 | |||
| Watering | –0.55 | 0.02 | |||
| Interaction | 0.55 | 0.02 | |||
| Emergence and fall survival in fully disturbed plots | Intercept | –1.67 | |||
| Area | 1.14 | 0.00 | |||
| Watering | 0.07 | 0.73 | |||
| Interaction | –1.18 | 0.01 | |||
| Emergence and fall survival | Intercept | –2.04 | |||
| Disturbance Type | 0.87 | 0.00 | |||
| Area | 0.19 | 0.02 | |||
| Watering | –0.46 | 0.00 | |||
| Fall rosette size | Intercept | 0.17 | –0.12 | ||
| Disturbance Type | –0.23 | 0.01 | 0.49 | 0.000 | |
| Area | 0.17 | 0.00 | 0.17 | 0.000 | |
| Watering | 0.12 | 0.08 | 0.03 | 0.67 | |
indicates significance of p≤0.05.
indicates significance of p≤0.01.
indicates significance of p≤0.001.
Model results for fall measurements are shown in Table 1. Generalized linear mixed-effects models were fit, using likelihood ratio tests to determine whether model fit was improved by including interactions. Where higher order interactions were present (such as analyses of germination for C. nutans), Larger microsite area generally led to increased germination, survival and size. Rosette size was higher in clipped plots for C. acanthoides versus fully disturbed plots for C. nutans. Watering either had no effect or a negative effect;
Post-overwintering response to microsite characteristics.
|
|
| ||||
| Explanatory variable | Coefficient | p- value | Coefficient | p- value | |
| Survival to July (given emergence) | Intercept | –0.21 | |||
| Disturbance Type | 0.50 | 0.09 | |||
| Area | 0.33 | 0.02 | |||
| Watering | –0.85 | 0.00 | |||
| Survival to July (given emergence) in clipped plots | Intercept | 0.80 | |||
| Area | 0.44 | 0.02 | |||
| Watering | 0.32 | 0.42 | |||
| Survival to July (given emergence)in fully disturbed plots | Intercept | 0.28 | |||
| Area | 0.19 | 0.20 | |||
| Watering | –0.45 | 0.11 | |||
| Proportion of thistles present which flowered | Intercept | –1.50 | –3.39 | ||
| Disturbance Type | 0.83 | 0.02 | 0.05 | 0.94 | |
| Area | 0.46 | 0.00 | 0.90 | 0.00 | |
| Watering | 0.14 | 0.66 | 0.12 | 0.82 | |
indicates significance of p≤0.05.
indicates significance of p≤0.01.
indicates significance of p≤0.001.
Generalized linear mixed-effects models were fit, using likelihood ratio tests to determine whether model fit was improved by including interactions. Where higher order interactions were present (such as analyses of germination for C. nutans), separate models were fit on clipped and fully disturbed plots. Larger microsite area generally led to increased survival and flowering probabilities. Full disturbance led to higher proportions flowering for C. nutans. Watering typically had no significant effect; in one case, it had a negative impact on C. acanthoides.