BACKGROUND:Baseline Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) is usually based on a single measurement. Here we evaluated whether using a baseline EDSS derived from two pre-treatment measurements improves the detection of progression events and the ability to demonstrate a therapeutic effect in delaying MS disability progression. METHODS: Real data from OLYMPUS, a phase II/III randomized, placebo-controlled trial of rituximab in patients with primary progressive multiple sclerosis (PPMS), as well as simulated data were analyzed. Several definitions of baseline EDSS were used to capture sustained disability progression (SDP) events. Variations in the EDSS were estimated by linear mixed-effect models. RESULTS: Selecting the higher of two baseline EDSS scores lowered the number of SDP events in both treatment groups, so decreasing sensitivity, and reduced the number of false SDP events, so increasing specificity. Conversely, selecting the lower of two baseline scores increased sensitivity but decreased specificity. Increased power (~7% based on the simulation study) was observed when the average of screening and Week 0 EDSS scores was used for baseline. CONCLUSION: Baseline EDSS derived from two pre-treatment EDSS measurements may enhance the ability of detecting a therapeutic effect in slowing disability progression in PPMS. This strategy could be implemented in future clinical trials of patients with MS.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: Baseline Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) is usually based on a single measurement. Here we evaluated whether using a baseline EDSS derived from two pre-treatment measurements improves the detection of progression events and the ability to demonstrate a therapeutic effect in delaying MS disability progression. METHODS: Real data from OLYMPUS, a phase II/III randomized, placebo-controlled trial of rituximab in patients with primary progressive multiple sclerosis (PPMS), as well as simulated data were analyzed. Several definitions of baseline EDSS were used to capture sustained disability progression (SDP) events. Variations in the EDSS were estimated by linear mixed-effect models. RESULTS: Selecting the higher of two baseline EDSS scores lowered the number of SDP events in both treatment groups, so decreasing sensitivity, and reduced the number of false SDP events, so increasing specificity. Conversely, selecting the lower of two baseline scores increased sensitivity but decreased specificity. Increased power (~7% based on the simulation study) was observed when the average of screening and Week 0 EDSS scores was used for baseline. CONCLUSION: Baseline EDSS derived from two pre-treatment EDSS measurements may enhance the ability of detecting a therapeutic effect in slowing disability progression in PPMS. This strategy could be implemented in future clinical trials of patients with MS.
Authors: Peter Joseph Jongen; Keith Wesnes; Björn van Geel; Paul Pop; Hans Schrijver; Leo H Visser; H Jacobus Gilhuis; Ludovicus G Sinnige; Augustina M Brands Journal: Mult Scler Int Date: 2015-04-29
Authors: Peter Joseph Jongen; Ludovicus G Sinnige; Björn M van Geel; Freek Verheul; Wim I Verhagen; Ruud A van der Kruijk; Reinoud Haverkamp; Hans M Schrijver; J Coby Baart; Leo H Visser; Edo P Arnoldus; H Jacobus Gilhuis; Paul Pop; Monique Booy; Wim Lemmens; Rogier Donders; Anton Kool; Esther van Noort Journal: Patient Prefer Adherence Date: 2015-12-11 Impact factor: 2.711
Authors: Peter Joseph Jongen; Keith Wesnes; Björn van Geel; Paul Pop; Evert Sanders; Hans Schrijver; Leo H Visser; H Jacobus Gilhuis; Ludovicus G Sinnige; Augustina M Brands Journal: PLoS One Date: 2014-05-01 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Emmanuelle Waubant; Amir-Hadi Maghzi; Nisha Revirajan; Rebecca Spain; Laura Julian; Ellen M Mowry; Jacqueline Marcus; Shuang Liu; Chengshi Jin; Ari Green; Charles E McCulloch; Daniel Pelletier Journal: Ann Clin Transl Neurol Date: 2014-04-14 Impact factor: 4.511
Authors: Harry J Witchel; Cäcilia Oberndorfer; Robert Needham; Aoife Healy; Carina E I Westling; Joseph H Guppy; Jake Bush; Jens Barth; Chantal Herberz; Daniel Roggen; Björn M Eskofier; Waqar Rashid; Nachiappan Chockalingam; Jochen Klucken Journal: Front Neurol Date: 2018-09-14 Impact factor: 4.003