OBJECTIVES: The use of tenofovir is highly associated with the emergence of mutation K65R, which confers broad resistance to nucleoside/nucleotide analogue reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs), especially when tenofovir is combined with other NRTIs also selecting for K65R. Although recent HIV-1 treatment guidelines discouraging these combinations resulted in reduced K65R selection with tenofovir, updated information on the impact of currently recommended regimens on the population selection rate of K65R is presently lacking. METHODS: In this study, we evaluated changes over time in the selection rate of resistance mutation K65R in a large population of 2736 HIV-1-infected patients failing combination antiretroviral treatment between 2002 and 2010. RESULTS: The K65R resistance mutation was detected in 144 patients, a prevalence of 5.3%. A large majority of observed K65R cases were explained by the use of tenofovir, reflecting its wide use in clinical practice. However, changing patterns over time in NRTIs accompanying tenofovir resulted in a persistent decreasing probability of K65R selection by tenofovir-based therapy. The currently recommended NRTI combination tenofovir/emtricitabine was associated with a low probability of K65R emergence. For any given dual NRTI combination including tenofovir, higher selection rates of K65R were consistently observed with a non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor than with a protease inhibitor as the third agent. DISCUSSION: Our finding of a stable time trend of K65R despite elevated use of tenofovir illustrates increased potency of current HIV-1 therapy including tenofovir.
OBJECTIVES: The use of tenofovir is highly associated with the emergence of mutation K65R, which confers broad resistance to nucleoside/nucleotide analogue reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs), especially when tenofovir is combined with other NRTIs also selecting for K65R. Although recent HIV-1 treatment guidelines discouraging these combinations resulted in reduced K65R selection with tenofovir, updated information on the impact of currently recommended regimens on the population selection rate of K65R is presently lacking. METHODS: In this study, we evaluated changes over time in the selection rate of resistance mutation K65R in a large population of 2736 HIV-1-infectedpatients failing combination antiretroviral treatment between 2002 and 2010. RESULTS: The K65R resistance mutation was detected in 144 patients, a prevalence of 5.3%. A large majority of observed K65R cases were explained by the use of tenofovir, reflecting its wide use in clinical practice. However, changing patterns over time in NRTIs accompanying tenofovir resulted in a persistent decreasing probability of K65R selection by tenofovir-based therapy. The currently recommended NRTI combination tenofovir/emtricitabine was associated with a low probability of K65R emergence. For any given dual NRTI combination including tenofovir, higher selection rates of K65R were consistently observed with a non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor than with a protease inhibitor as the third agent. DISCUSSION: Our finding of a stable time trend of K65R despite elevated use of tenofovir illustrates increased potency of current HIV-1 therapy including tenofovir.
Authors: Simona Di Giambenedetto; Laura Bracciale; Manuela Colafigli; Manuela Colatigli; Paola Cattani; Carmen Pinnetti; Carmen Pannetti; Alessandro Bacarelli; Mattia Prosperi; Giovanni Fadda; Roberto Cauda; Andrea De Luca Journal: Antivir Ther Date: 2007
Authors: Scott M Hammer; Joseph J Eron; Peter Reiss; Robert T Schooley; Melanie A Thompson; Sharon Walmsley; Pedro Cahn; Margaret A Fischl; Jose M Gatell; Martin S Hirsch; Donna M Jacobsen; Julio S G Montaner; Douglas D Richman; Patrick G Yeni; Paul A Volberding Journal: JAMA Date: 2008-08-06 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Carmen de Mendoza; Inmaculada Jiménez-Nacher; Carolina Garrido; Pablo Barreiro; Eva Poveda; Angélica Corral; Natalia Zahonero; Juan González-Lahoz; Vincent Soriano Journal: Clin Infect Dis Date: 2008-06-01 Impact factor: 9.079
Authors: Viktor von Wyl; Sabine Yerly; Jürg Böni; Philippe Bürgisser; Thomas Klimkait; Manuel Battegay; Enos Bernasconi; Matthias Cavassini; Hansjakob Furrer; Bernard Hirschel; Pietro L Vernazza; Martin Rickenbach; Bruno Ledergerber; Huldrych F Günthard Journal: Clin Infect Dis Date: 2008-04-15 Impact factor: 9.079
Authors: Laura Waters; Mark Nelson; Sundhiya Mandalia; Mark Bower; Tom Powles; Brian Gazzard; Justin Stebbing Journal: Clin Infect Dis Date: 2008-01-01 Impact factor: 9.079
Authors: K Theys; J Vercauteren; J Snoeck; M Zazzi; R J Camacho; C Torti; E Schülter; B Clotet; A Sönnerborg; A De Luca; Z Grossman; D Struck; A-M Vandamme; A B Abecasis Journal: Antimicrob Agents Chemother Date: 2012-11-26 Impact factor: 5.191
Authors: Ana Santos-Pereira; Vera Triunfante; Pedro M M Araújo; Joana Martins; Helena Soares; Eva Poveda; Bernardino Souto; Nuno S Osório Journal: Int J Mol Sci Date: 2021-05-18 Impact factor: 5.923