Literature DB >> 23027596

Preservation versus non-preservation of mitral valve apparatus during mitral valve replacement: a meta-analysis of 3835 patients.

Michel Pompeu Barros de Oliveira Sá1, Paulo Ernando Ferraz, Rodrigo Renda Escobar, Wendell Santos Martins, Frederico Browne Correia de Araújo e Sá, Pablo César Lustosa, Frederico Pires Vasconcelos, Ricardo Carvalho Lima.   

Abstract

Resection of the chordopapillary apparatus during mitral valve replacement has been associated with a negative impact on survival. Mitral valve replacement with the preservation of the mitral valve apparatus has been associated with better outcomes, but surgeons remain refractory to its use. To determine if there is any real difference in preservation vs non-preservation of mitral valve apparatus during mitral valve replacement in terms of outcomes, we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis using MEDLINE, EMBASE, CENTRAL/CCTR, SciELO, LILACS, Google Scholar and reference lists of relevant articles to search for clinical studies that compared outcomes (30-day mortality, postoperative low cardiac output syndrome or 5-year mortality) between preservation vs non-preservation during mitral valve replacement from 1966 to 2011. The principal summary measures were odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence interval and P-values (that will be considered statistically significant when <0.05). The ORs were combined across studies using a weighted DerSimonian-Laird random-effects model. The meta-analysis was completed using the software Comprehensive Meta-Analysis version 2 (Biostat Inc., Englewood, NJ, USA). Twenty studies (3 randomized and 17 non-randomized) were identified and included a total of 3835 patients (1918 for mitral valve replacement preservation and 1917 for mitral valve replacement non-preservation). There was significant difference between mitral valve replacement preservation and mitral valve replacement non-preservation groups in the risk of 30-day mortality (OR 0.418, P <0.001), postoperative low cardiac output syndrome (OR 0.299, P <0.001) or 5-year mortality (OR 0.380, P <0.001). No publication bias or important heterogeneity of effects on any outcome was observed. In conclusion, we found evidence that argues in favour of the preservation of mitral valve apparatus during mitral valve replacement.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23027596      PMCID: PMC3501301          DOI: 10.1093/icvts/ivs379

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg        ISSN: 1569-9285


  27 in total

1.  Both leaflet preservation during mitral valve replacement: modified anterior leaflet preservation technique.

Authors:  Faruk Cingöz; Celalettin Günay; Erkan Kuralay; Vedat Yildirim; Selim Kiliç; Ufuk Demirkiliç; Mehmet Arslan; Harun Tatar
Journal:  J Card Surg       Date:  2004 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.620

2.  Mitral valve replacement with and without chordal preservation in a rheumatic population: serial echocardiographic assessment of left ventricular size and function.

Authors:  Ujjwal K Chowdhury; A Sampath Kumar; Balram Airan; Dinesh Mittal; K Ganapathy Subramaniam; Ram Prakash; Sandeep Seth; Rajvir Singh; Panangipalli Venugopal
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 4.330

3.  Importance of subvalvular preservation and early operation in mitral valve surgery.

Authors:  E M Lee; L M Shapiro; F C Wells
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1996-11-01       Impact factor: 29.690

4.  Comparison of open mitral commissurotomy with mitral valve replacement with or without chordal preservation in patients with mitral stenosis.

Authors:  D D Glower; K P Landolfo; R D Davis; Y Y Cen; J K Harrison; T M Bashore; J E Lowe; W G Wolfe
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1998-11-10       Impact factor: 29.690

5.  Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test.

Authors:  M Egger; G Davey Smith; M Schneider; C Minder
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1997-09-13

6.  Chordal preservation improves postoperative ventricular performance following valve replacement for chronic mitral regurgitation.

Authors:  Z Popovic; I Barac; M Jovic; M Ristic; G Panic; M Miric; M Bojic
Journal:  Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  1996-10

7.  Mitral valve prosthetic implantation with preservation of native mitral valve apparatus.

Authors:  T W Dubiel; J W Borowiec; F Mannting; J Landelius; H E Hansson; S O Nyström; E Cadavid
Journal:  Scand J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  1994

8.  Preservation of the mitral subvalvular apparatus in multiple valve procedures.

Authors:  U J Straub; H Huwer; T Petzold; G Kalweit; I Volkmer; E Gams
Journal:  J Heart Valve Dis       Date:  1995-09

9.  Results of represervation of the chordae tendineae during redo mitral valve replacement.

Authors:  V Rao; M Komeda; R D Weisel; J Ivanov; J S Ikonomidis; T Shirai; T E David
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 4.330

10.  Left ventricular outflow tract obstruction after mitral valve replacement.

Authors:  D De Canniere; J L Jansens; P Unger; J L Le Clerc
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 4.330

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.