Literature DB >> 23027449

Considerations of sex and gender differences in preclinical and clinical trials.

Limor Raz1, Virginia M Miller.   

Abstract

Women continue to be underrepresented in clinical trials, particularly in Phases I and II of experimental drug studies in spite of legislative guidelines in the USA, Canada, the European Union, Australia, and Japan requiring the inclusion of women in clinical trials. As such, women remain a vulnerable population subject to the adverse effects of pharmacological therapies. Thus, women experience higher rates of adverse drug reactions than do men and for women of reproductive age or who may be pregnant, therapeutic options may be limited. This chapter provides a brief history of inclusion of sex and gender as variables in clinical trials, summarizes governmental legislation for consideration of sex and gender in clinical trials and provides specific examples of drugs which have been withdrawn from the market because of side effects in women. Additional information related to sex and gender in preclinical testing, trial design, challenges to recruitment of women for clinical trials and statistical methods for analysis of data also is considered.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23027449     DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-30726-3_7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Handb Exp Pharmacol        ISSN: 0171-2004


  15 in total

1.  Editor's spotlight/take 5: sex-specific analysis of data in high-impact orthopaedic journals: how are we doing?

Authors:  Jo A Hannafin; Seth S Leopold
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2015-08-22       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Fairness to all: gender and sex in scientific reporting.

Authors:  Seth S Leopold; Lee Beadling; Matthew B Dobbs; Mark C Gebhardt; Paul A Lotke; Paul A Manner; Clare M Rimnac; Montri D Wongworawat
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-11-26       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Editor's Spotlight/Take 5: Disability after Deployment Injury: Are Women and Men Service Members Different?

Authors:  Seth S Leopold; Jessica C Rivera
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2015-06-12       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 4.  Pharmacogenomics, pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics: interaction with biological differences between men and women.

Authors:  Flavia Franconi; Ilaria Campesi
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 8.739

5.  Editor's Spotlight/Take 5: Is Our Science Representative? A Systematic Review of Racial and Ethnic Diversity in Orthopaedic Clinical Trials from 2000 to 2020.

Authors:  Seth S Leopold
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2022-03-23       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Editor's Spotlight/Take 5: How Long Will It Take to Reach Gender Parity in Orthopaedic Surgery in the United States? An Analysis of the National Provider Identifier Registry.

Authors:  Seth S Leopold
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2021-06-01       Impact factor: 4.755

7.  Sex distribution of study samples reported in American Society of Biomechanics annual meeting abstracts.

Authors:  Sarah Bach; Melissa M Morrow; Kristin D Zhao; Richard E Hughes
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-03-04       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Effects of treatment with zofenopril in men and women with acute myocardial infarction: gender analysis of the SMILE Program.

Authors:  Flavia Franconi; Stefano Omboni; Ettore Ambrosioni; Giorgio Reggiardo; Ilaria Campesi; Claudio Borghi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-11-03       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 9.  Improving clinical outcomes through attention to sex and hormones in research.

Authors:  Michelle M Mielke; Virginia M Miller
Journal:  Nat Rev Endocrinol       Date:  2021-07-27       Impact factor: 47.564

Review 10.  Should there be sex-specific criteria for the diagnosis and treatment of heart failure?

Authors:  Lawrence E Greiten; Sara J Holditch; Shivaram Poigai Arunachalam; Virginia M Miller
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Transl Res       Date:  2013-11-09       Impact factor: 4.132

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.