CONTEXT: Focused hypnotic concentration is a model for brain control over sensation and behavior. Pain and anxiety can be effectively alleviated by hypnotic suggestion, which modulates activity in brain regions associated with focused attention, but the specific neural network underlying this phenomenon is not known. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the brain basis of hypnotizability. DESIGN: Cross-sectional, in vivo neuroimaging study performed from November 2005 through July 2006. SETTING: Academic medical center at Stanford University School of Medicine. PATIENTS: Twelve adults with high and 12 adults with low hypnotizability. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Functional magnetic resonance imaging to measure functional connectivity networks at rest, including default-mode, salience, and executive-control networks; structural T1 magnetic resonance imaging to measure regional gray and white matter volumes; and diffusion tensor imaging to measure white matter microstructural integrity. RESULTS: High compared with low hypnotizable individuals had greater functional connectivity between the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, an executive-control region of the brain, and the salience network composed of the dorsal anterior cingulate cortex, anterior insula, amygdala, and ventral striatum, involved in detecting, integrating, and filtering relevant somatic, autonomic, and emotional information using independent component analysis. Seed-based analysis confirmed elevated functional coupling between the dorsal anterior cingulate cortex and the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex in high compared with low hypnotizable individuals. These functional differences were not due to any variation in brain structure in these regions, including regional gray and white matter volumes and white matter microstructure. CONCLUSIONS: Our results provide novel evidence that altered functional connectivity in the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex and dorsal anterior cingulate cortex may underlie hypnotizability. Future studies focusing on how these functional networks change and interact during hypnosis are warranted.
CONTEXT: Focused hypnotic concentration is a model for brain control over sensation and behavior. Pain and anxiety can be effectively alleviated by hypnotic suggestion, which modulates activity in brain regions associated with focused attention, but the specific neural network underlying this phenomenon is not known. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the brain basis of hypnotizability. DESIGN: Cross-sectional, in vivo neuroimaging study performed from November 2005 through July 2006. SETTING: Academic medical center at Stanford University School of Medicine. PATIENTS: Twelve adults with high and 12 adults with low hypnotizability. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Functional magnetic resonance imaging to measure functional connectivity networks at rest, including default-mode, salience, and executive-control networks; structural T1 magnetic resonance imaging to measure regional gray and white matter volumes; and diffusion tensor imaging to measure white matter microstructural integrity. RESULTS: High compared with low hypnotizable individuals had greater functional connectivity between the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, an executive-control region of the brain, and the salience network composed of the dorsal anterior cingulate cortex, anterior insula, amygdala, and ventral striatum, involved in detecting, integrating, and filtering relevant somatic, autonomic, and emotional information using independent component analysis. Seed-based analysis confirmed elevated functional coupling between the dorsal anterior cingulate cortex and the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex in high compared with low hypnotizable individuals. These functional differences were not due to any variation in brain structure in these regions, including regional gray and white matter volumes and white matter microstructure. CONCLUSIONS: Our results provide novel evidence that altered functional connectivity in the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex and dorsal anterior cingulate cortex may underlie hypnotizability. Future studies focusing on how these functional networks change and interact during hypnosis are warranted.
Authors: Anna Szekely; Reka Kovacs-Nagy; Eva I Bányai; Anna C Gosi-Greguss; Katalin Varga; Zsuzsa Halmai; Zsolt Ronai; Maria Sasvari-Szekely Journal: Int J Clin Exp Hypn Date: 2010-07
Authors: William W Seeley; Vinod Menon; Alan F Schatzberg; Jennifer Keller; Gary H Glover; Heather Kenna; Allan L Reiss; Michael D Greicius Journal: J Neurosci Date: 2007-02-28 Impact factor: 6.167
Authors: Bharat B Biswal; Maarten Mennes; Xi-Nian Zuo; Suril Gohel; Clare Kelly; Steve M Smith; Christian F Beckmann; Jonathan S Adelstein; Randy L Buckner; Stan Colcombe; Anne-Marie Dogonowski; Monique Ernst; Damien Fair; Michelle Hampson; Matthew J Hoptman; James S Hyde; Vesa J Kiviniemi; Rolf Kötter; Shi-Jiang Li; Ching-Po Lin; Mark J Lowe; Clare Mackay; David J Madden; Kristoffer H Madsen; Daniel S Margulies; Helen S Mayberg; Katie McMahon; Christopher S Monk; Stewart H Mostofsky; Bonnie J Nagel; James J Pekar; Scott J Peltier; Steven E Petersen; Valentin Riedl; Serge A R B Rombouts; Bart Rypma; Bradley L Schlaggar; Sein Schmidt; Rachael D Seidler; Greg J Siegle; Christian Sorg; Gao-Jun Teng; Juha Veijola; Arno Villringer; Martin Walter; Lihong Wang; Xu-Chu Weng; Susan Whitfield-Gabrieli; Peter Williamson; Christian Windischberger; Yu-Feng Zang; Hong-Ying Zhang; F Xavier Castellanos; Michael P Milham Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2010-02-22 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Michael J Hove; Johannes Stelzer; Till Nierhaus; Sabrina D Thiel; Christopher Gundlach; Daniel S Margulies; Koene R A Van Dijk; Robert Turner; Peter E Keller; Björn Merker Journal: Cereb Cortex Date: 2015-06-23 Impact factor: 5.357
Authors: Danielle D DeSouza; Katy H Stimpson; Laima Baltusis; Matthew D Sacchet; Meng Gu; Ralph Hurd; Hua Wu; David C Yeomans; Nolan Willliams; David Spiegel Journal: Cereb Cortex Date: 2020-05-18 Impact factor: 5.357