Literature DB >> 23026805

Patient safety and office-based anesthesia.

Richard D Urman1, Nathan Punwani, Fred E Shapiro.   

Abstract

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Office-based anesthesia is a new and growing subspecialty within ambulatory anesthesia. We examine major developments in office-based anesthesia and how patient safety can be maintained. RECENT
FINDINGS: The emergence of office-based anesthesia as a subspecialty of ambulatory anesthesia is a result of economic and social factors, and is also due to the development of better surgical techniques and anesthestic drugs. There is still a dearth of primary literature that addresses patient safety in the office-based setting. Some existing literature points to increased risk in the office, although others suggest that proper provider credentialing, qualifications, and appropriate facility accreditation can improve patient outcomes compared to surgicenters and inpatient facilities. There is a lack of state and federal oversight of office-based facilities. Increased regulation and standardization of care, such as the use of check lists and professional society guidelines, can help promote safer practices.
SUMMARY: There is no uniform standard of care for performing procedures in the office-based setting. Healthcare providers are facing the challenge of creating a safer, efficient, cost-effective and patient-centered environment. Available data show that the office-based practice can be as safe as any ambulatory surgicenter or hospital, as long as patients, regulators, and physicians become educated advocates of safer practices. In addition, procedures can be performed safely with general anesthesia or conscious sedation, provided that there are properly trained personnel and adequate equipment and facilities. Moreover, physicians should be credentialed to perform the same procedure in a hospital that they perform in an office.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23026805     DOI: 10.1097/ACO.0b013e3283593094

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Opin Anaesthesiol        ISSN: 0952-7907            Impact factor:   2.706


  6 in total

1.  Mortality and Morbidity in Office-Based General Anesthesia for Dentistry in Ontario.

Authors:  Alia El-Mowafy; Carilynne Yarascavitch; Hussein Haji; Carlos Quiñonez; Daniel A Haas
Journal:  Anesth Prog       Date:  2019

Review 2.  [Unilateral spinal anesthesia : Literature review and recommendations].

Authors:  B Büttner; A Mansur; M Bauer; J Hinz; I Bergmann
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 1.041

Review 3.  The effect of facility characteristics on patient safety, patient experience, and service availability for procedures in non-hospital-affiliated outpatient settings: A systematic review.

Authors:  Nancy F Berglas; Molly F Battistelli; Wanda K Nicholson; Mindy Sobota; Richard D Urman; Sarah C M Roberts
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-01-05       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 4.  Current trends in intravenous sedative drugs for dental procedures.

Authors:  Ji-Young Yoon; Eun-Jung Kim
Journal:  J Dent Anesth Pain Med       Date:  2016-06-30

5.  Outcomes of Surgeries Performed in Physician Offices Compared With Ambulatory Surgery Centers and Hospital Outpatient Departments in Florida.

Authors:  Robert L Ohsfeldt; Pengxiang Li; John E Schneider; Ivana Stojanovic; Cara M Scheibling
Journal:  Health Serv Insights       Date:  2017-04-20

6.  Analysis of percutaneous kyphoplasty under different types of anesthesia for the treatment of multiple osteoporotic vertebral fractures.

Authors:  Shuai Zhang; Shuang Xu; Jin Yang; Song Wang; Qing Wang
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2020-11-12       Impact factor: 2.362

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.