Literature DB >> 23026759

Shielding cognition from nociception with working memory.

Valéry Legrain1, Geert Crombez, Léon Plaghki, André Mouraux.   

Abstract

Because pain often signals the occurrence of potential tissue damage, nociceptive stimuli have the capacity to capture attention and interfere with ongoing cognitive activities. Working memory is known to guide the orientation of attention by maintaining goal priorities active during the achievement of a task. This study investigated whether the cortical processing of nociceptive stimuli and their ability to capture attention are under the control of working memory. Event-related brain potentials (ERPs) were recorded while participants performed primary tasks on visual targets that required or did not require rehearsal in working memory (1-back vs 0-back conditions). The visual targets were shortly preceded by task-irrelevant tactile stimuli. Occasionally, in order to distract the participants, the tactile stimuli were replaced by novel nociceptive stimuli. In the 0-back conditions, task performance was disrupted by the occurrence of the nociceptive distracters, as reflected by the increased reaction times in trials with novel nociceptive distracters as compared to trials with standard tactile distracters. In the 1-back conditions, such a difference disappeared suggesting that attentional capture and task disruption induced by nociceptive distracters were suppressed by working memory, regardless of task demands. Most importantly, in the conditions involving working memory, the magnitude of nociceptive ERPs, including ERP components at early latency, were significantly reduced. This indicates that working memory is able to modulate the cortical processing of nociceptive input already at its earliest stages, and could explain why working memory reduces consequently ability of nociceptive stimuli to capture attention and disrupt performance of the primary task. It is concluded that protecting cognitive processing against pain interference is best guaranteed by keeping out of working memory pain-related information.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23026759     DOI: 10.1016/j.cortex.2012.08.014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cortex        ISSN: 0010-9452            Impact factor:   4.027


  12 in total

1.  Neural correlates of working memory's suppression of aversive olfactory distraction effects.

Authors:  Alexander Weigard; Stephen J Wilson; Zvi Shapiro; Hilary Galloway-Long; Cynthia Huang-Pollock
Journal:  Brain Imaging Behav       Date:  2021-01-06       Impact factor: 3.978

2.  Indoor apparent temperature, cognition, and daytime sleepiness among low-income adults in a temperate climate.

Authors:  Carina J Gronlund; Kaan Cem Ketenci; Tony G Reames; Peter S Larson; Justin Schott; Zachary Rowe; Quinton S Jenkins; Mario O Sanca; Troy Tournat; Ketlyne Sol; Don'aa Williams; Emma Gijsbers; Marie S O'Neill
Journal:  Indoor Air       Date:  2021-12-09       Impact factor: 6.554

3.  Enhancement of pain inhibition by working memory with anodal transcranial direct current stimulation of the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex.

Authors:  Zoha Deldar; Nabi Rustamov; Suzie Bois; Isabelle Blanchette; Mathieu Piché
Journal:  J Physiol Sci       Date:  2018-02-15       Impact factor: 2.781

4.  Effects of chiropractic spinal manipulation on laser-evoked pain and brain activity.

Authors:  Benjamin Provencher; Stéphane Northon; Carlos Gevers Montoro; Julie O'Shaughnessy; Mathieu Piché
Journal:  J Physiol Sci       Date:  2021-06-24       Impact factor: 2.781

5.  Chronic Pain Produces Reversible Memory Deficits That Depend on Task Difficulty in Rats.

Authors:  Caroline E Phelps; Edita Navratilova; Frank Porreca
Journal:  J Pain       Date:  2021-05-20       Impact factor: 5.820

6.  Nonlinear Effects of Noxious Thermal Stimulation and Working Memory Demands on Subjective Pain Perception.

Authors:  John A Sturgeon; Meghan M Tieu; Laura E Jastrzab; Rebecca McCue; Vanisha Gandhi; Sean C Mackey
Journal:  Pain Med       Date:  2015-04-30       Impact factor: 3.637

7.  The disruptive effects of pain on complex cognitive performance and executive control.

Authors:  Edmund Keogh; David J Moore; Geoffrey B Duggan; Stephen J Payne; Christopher Eccleston
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-12-30       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Mind Your Grip: Even Usual Dexterous Manipulation Requires High Level Cognition.

Authors:  Erwan Guillery; André Mouraux; Jean-Louis Thonnard; Valéry Legrain
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2017-11-06       Impact factor: 3.558

9.  Salience of Somatosensory Stimulus Modulating External-to-Internal Orienting Attention.

Authors:  Jiaxin Peng; Sam C C Chan; Bolton K H Chau; Qiuhua Yu; Chetwyn C H Chan
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2017-08-24       Impact factor: 3.169

10.  Rating the Intensity of a Laser Stimulus, but Not Attending to Changes in Its Location or Intensity Modulates the Laser-Evoked Cortical Activity.

Authors:  Diana M E Torta; Marco Ninghetto; Raffaella Ricci; Valéry Legrain
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2020-03-31       Impact factor: 3.169

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.