Literature DB >> 23026439

Stop or stop-change--does it make any difference for the inhibition process?

Maren Boecker1, Siegfried Gauggel, Barbara Drueke.   

Abstract

In the course of daily living altering environmental conditions or changing internal states often cause us to abandon obsolete planned or initiated actions and force us to update our behavior. The stop-change paradigm, an extension of the very popular stop-signal paradigm, allows the investigation of response inhibition and response re-engagement in a laboratory setting. This is very important as everyday life rarely calls for the complete suppression of actions without subsequent behavioral adjustment. The present review first gives a short overview on stop-signal inhibition and its behavioral and neural models before summarizing the findings in the stop-change domain. In doing so, this review shall contribute to a better understanding of the functional and neural architecture of response inhibition and re-engagement. Moreover, the question is raised whether the same or different inhibition process(es) are involved in stop-signal- and stop-change inhibition.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23026439     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2012.09.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Psychophysiol        ISSN: 0167-8760            Impact factor:   2.997


  16 in total

1.  How to stop or change a motor response: Laplacian and independent component analysis approach.

Authors:  Mauricio Rangel-Gomez; Robert T Knight; Ulrike M Krämer
Journal:  Int J Psychophysiol       Date:  2015-02-07       Impact factor: 2.997

2.  Evidence for capacity sharing when stopping.

Authors:  Frederick Verbruggen; Gordon D Logan
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2015-05-28

3.  Effects of reward and punishment on the interaction between going and stopping in a selective stop-change task.

Authors:  Frederick Verbruggen; Rosamund McLaren
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2016-11-25

4.  Firing of Putative Dopamine Neurons in Ventral Tegmental Area Is Modulated by Probability of Success during Performance of a Stop-Change Task.

Authors:  Stephen S Tennyson; Adam T Brockett; Nicholas W Hricz; Daniel W Bryden; Matthew R Roesch
Journal:  eNeuro       Date:  2018-04-20

5.  A novel continuous inhibitory-control task: variation in individual performance by young pheasants (Phasianus colchicus).

Authors:  Christina Meier; Sara Raj Pant; Jayden O van Horik; Philippa R Laker; Ellis J G Langley; Mark A Whiteside; Frederick Verbruggen; Joah R Madden
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2017-08-09       Impact factor: 3.084

6.  Deficits in physiological and self-conscious emotional response to errors in hoarding disorder.

Authors:  Jessica J Zakrzewski; Samir Datta; Carole Scherling; Krystal Nizar; Ofilio Vigil; Howard Rosen; Carol A Mathews
Journal:  Psychiatry Res       Date:  2018-07-10       Impact factor: 3.222

7.  Online Movement Correction in Response to the Unexpectedly Perturbed Initial or Final Action Goals: An ERP and sLORETA Study.

Authors:  Lin Yu; Thomas Schack; Dirk Koester
Journal:  Brain Sci       Date:  2021-05-15

8.  Action Video Gaming and Cognitive Control: Playing First Person Shooter Games Is Associated with Improved Action Cascading but Not Inhibition.

Authors:  Laura Steenbergen; Roberta Sellaro; Ann-Kathrin Stock; Christian Beste; Lorenza S Colzato
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-12-10       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Temporal Uncertainty and Temporal Estimation Errors Affect Insular Activity and the Frontostriatal Indirect Pathway during Action Update: A Predictive Coding Study.

Authors:  Roberto Limongi; Francisco J Pérez; Cristián Modroño; José L González-Mora
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2016-06-27       Impact factor: 3.169

10.  Ready for change: Oscillatory mechanisms of proactive motor control.

Authors:  Matthias Liebrand; Jascha Kristek; Elinor Tzvi; Ulrike M Krämer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-05-16       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.