Literature DB >> 2302631

Therapeutic priorities of Canadian internists.

A Laupacis1, D L Sackett, R S Roberts.   

Abstract

We surveyed 175 members of the Canadian Society of Internal Medicine to determine how they would rank seven commonly used treatments as to their clinical usefulness. A total of 70% of the respondents judged that the treatment of severe hypertension was the most beneficial. Coronary artery bypass surgery and treatment with acetylsalicylic acid for transient ischemic attacks were ranked next most useful. Cholestyramine therapy for hypercholesterolemia, the treatment of mild hypertension, isoniazid therapy for inactive tuberculosis and carotid endarterectomy in patients with mild stroke formed the final cluster. Except for treatment of severe hypertension there was a wide variation in the physicians' enthusiasm for the various treatments. Possible explanations for this variation include physicians' lack of awareness of the results of clinical trials, the wide range of risk reductions found in various trials of the same therapy, an unwillingness by physicians to generalize from clinical trials to individual patients, individual physicians' placement of different values on the morbidity associated with various diseases, and the fact that physicians may rarely explicitly compare the usefulness of therapies. In general, the number of patients needed to be treated to save one life better reflected the physicians' judgements than did the relative risk reduction.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2302631      PMCID: PMC1451830     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  CMAJ        ISSN: 0820-3946            Impact factor:   8.262


  14 in total

1.  The dissemination of new medical information.

Authors:  J K Stross; W R Harlan
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1979-06-15       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 2.  Identification and treatment of low-risk patients after acute myocardial infarction and coronary-artery bypass graft surgery.

Authors:  R F DeBusk; C G Blomqvist; N T Kouchoukos; R V Luepker; H S Miller; A J Moss; M L Pollock; T J Reeves; R H Selvester; W B Stason
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1986-01-16       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  Was the international randomized trial of extracranial-intracranial arterial bypass representative of the population at risk?

Authors:  T M Sundt
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1987-03-26       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  Case history questionnaires in the study of doctors' use of resources. Are they measuring what we want?

Authors:  R M Hartley; J R Charlton; B Jarman; C M Harris
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1985-10       Impact factor: 2.983

Review 5.  Meta-analysis in clinical research.

Authors:  K A L'Abbé; A S Detsky; K O'Rourke
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1987-08       Impact factor: 25.391

6.  Randomized controlled clinical trials: The behavioral case.

Authors:  D H Spodick
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1982-04-23       Impact factor: 56.272

7.  Information needs in office practice: are they being met?

Authors:  D G Covell; G C Uman; P R Manning
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1985-10       Impact factor: 25.391

8.  Helsinki Heart Study: primary-prevention trial with gemfibrozil in middle-aged men with dyslipidemia. Safety of treatment, changes in risk factors, and incidence of coronary heart disease.

Authors:  M H Frick; O Elo; K Haapa; O P Heinonen; P Heinsalmi; P Helo; J K Huttunen; P Kaitaniemi; P Koskinen; V Manninen
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1987-11-12       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 9.  Identification of patients who do not require beta antagonists after myocardial infarction.

Authors:  G G Ahumada
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  1984-05       Impact factor: 4.965

10.  Aspirin, sulfinpyrazone, or both in unstable angina. Results of a Canadian multicenter trial.

Authors:  J A Cairns; M Gent; J Singer; K J Finnie; G M Froggatt; D A Holder; G Jablonsky; W J Kostuk; L J Melendez; M G Myers
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1985-11-28       Impact factor: 91.245

View more
  6 in total

Review 1.  The effects of information framing on the practices of physicians.

Authors:  P McGettigan; K Sly; D O'Connell; S Hill; D Henry
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 5.128

2.  Evidence based purchasing: understanding results of clinical trials and systematic reviews.

Authors:  T Fahey; S Griffiths; T J Peters
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1995-10-21

3.  Understanding clinical trials.

Authors:  D L Sackett; R J Cook
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1994-09-24

4.  The impact of expressions of treatment efficacy and out-of-pocket expenses on patient and physician interest in osteoporosis treatment: implications for pay-for-performance programs.

Authors:  Christine A Sinsky; Valerie Foreman-Hoffman; Peter Cram
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2007-12-28       Impact factor: 5.128

5.  Do doctors accurately assess coronary risk in their patients? Preliminary results of the coronary health assessment study.

Authors:  S A Grover; I Lowensteyn; K L Esrey; Y Steinert; L Joseph; M Abrahamowicz
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1995-04-15

6.  Applying the results of clinical trials to patients to general practice: perceived problems, strengths, assumptions, and challenges for the future.

Authors:  T Fahey
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 5.386

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.