Literature DB >> 23025906

Instructor comfort level in high-fidelity simulation.

B Nicole Harder1, Carolyn J M Ross, Pauline Paul.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The literature in the use of simulation in nursing education has expanded significantly over the past 5-10 years. What it is like as an instructor who facilitates this experience is largely unexplored. This paper is part of a larger ethnographic study, and represents findings related to the comfort level of instructors facilitating in high-fidelity simulation (HFS).
OBJECTIVES: The question of what is it like to engage in simulated clinical experiences as an instructor is presented in this paper. DESIGN AND PARTICIPANTS: Twenty instructors participated in two separate focus groups and two instructors participated in individual interviews. The average years of nursing experience for this group was over 20 years, whereas the number of years of experience as a clinical instructor was less than five years.
METHODS: Ethical approval was obtained from two academic institutions. A focused ethnography was conducted and included two terms of participant observations, recorded field notes, individual interviews and focus groups. Data was coded and then sorted for themes related to the instructor experience.
RESULTS: The primary results focus on the comfort level of instructors in HFS, and what instructors believe this meant to student learning in HFS.
CONCLUSIONS: What the instructor does during HFS and how they feel about their ability to facilitate HFS has a perceived effect on student learning. Crown
Copyright © 2012. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Comfort level; High-fidelity simulation; Instructor confidence

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23025906     DOI: 10.1016/j.nedt.2012.09.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nurse Educ Today        ISSN: 0260-6917            Impact factor:   3.442


  5 in total

Review 1.  Faculty Development Approaches for Life Support Courses: A Scoping Review.

Authors:  Ying-Chih Ko; Ming-Ju Hsieh; Adam Cheng; Kasper G Lauridsen; Taylor L Sawyer; Farhan Bhanji; Robert Greif
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2022-06-03       Impact factor: 6.106

2.  Comparison of high- and low equipment fidelity during paediatric simulation team training: a case control study.

Authors:  Lisbet Meurling; Leif Hedman; Karl-Johan Lidefelt; Cecilia Escher; Li Felländer-Tsai; Carl-Johan Wallin
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2014-10-18       Impact factor: 2.463

3.  Cultural Norms of Clinical Simulation in Undergraduate Nursing Education.

Authors:  Susan G McNiesh
Journal:  Glob Qual Nurs Res       Date:  2015-02-17

4.  Foundational Elements of Applied Simulation Theory: Development and Implementation of a Longitudinal Simulation Educator Curriculum.

Authors:  Michelle Chiu; Glenn Posner; Susan Humphrey-Murto
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2017-01-27

5.  Method matters: impact of in-scenario instruction on simulation-based teamwork training.

Authors:  Cecilia Escher; Hans Rystedt; Johan Creutzfeldt; Lisbet Meurling; Sofia Nyström; Johanna Dahlberg; Samuel Edelbring; Torben Nordahl Amorøe; Håkan Hult; Li Felländer-Tsai; Madeleine Abrandt-Dahlgren
Journal:  Adv Simul (Lond)       Date:  2017-11-28
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.