Literature DB >> 23025865

Measuring radiology's value in time saved.

Christoph I Lee1, Dieter R Enzmann.   

Abstract

Because radiology has historically not measured its added value to patient care and thus not communicated it in easily understood terms to all stakeholders, the specialty must correct this to prepare for the eventual transition from the current fee-for-service payment schedule to new value-based reimbursement systems. Given the increasing risk for marginalization, radiologists need to engage clinicians and managers to map the processes and associated costs of episodes of patient care to identify areas for providing and improving integrated diagnostic information and to measure the value thereof. In such time-driven, activity-based costing practices, radiologists should highlight how proper investments in the information generated by imaging and how radiologists' associated consultative and coordination of services can save greater resources downstream, especially in the nonrenewable resource of physician time, an increasingly scarce health care resource. Using physician time in the most efficient way will be a key element for decreasing health care costs at the aggregate level. Therefore, expressing radiology's contribution in terms of downstream physician time saved is a metric that can be easily understood by all stakeholders. In a conceptual framework centered on value, the specialty of radiology must focus more on its most important product, actionable information, rather than on imaging technologies themselves. Information, unlike imaging technologies, does not depreciate with time but rather increases in value the more it is used.
Copyright © 2012 American College of Radiology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23025865     DOI: 10.1016/j.jacr.2012.06.022

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol        ISSN: 1546-1440            Impact factor:   5.532


  5 in total

Review 1.  Academic radiology in the new health care delivery environment.

Authors:  Aliya Qayyum; John-Paul J Yu; Akash P Kansagra; Nathaniel von Fischer; Daniel Costa; Matthew Heller; Stamatis Kantartzis; R Scooter Plowman; Jason Itri
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 3.173

2.  Computer-Aided Reporting of Chest Radiographs: Efficient and Effective Screening in the Value-Based Imaging Era.

Authors:  Michael Morris; Babak Saboury; Niketh Bandla; Christopher Toland; Christopher Meenan; Eliot Siegel; Jean Jeudy
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 4.056

3.  Clinical implementation of an emergency department coronary computed tomographic angiography protocol for triage of patients with suspected acute coronary syndrome.

Authors:  Brian B Ghoshhajra; Richard A P Takx; Pedro V Staziaki; Harshna Vadvala; Phillip Kim; Tomas G Neilan; Nandini M Meyersohn; Daniel Bittner; Sumbal A Janjua; Thomas Mayrhofer; Jeffrey L Greenwald; Quyhn A Truong; Suhny Abbara; David F M Brown; James L Januzzi; Sanjeev Francis; John T Nagurney; Udo Hoffmann
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2016-11-24       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  Defining the diagnostic divide: an analysis of registered radiological equipment resources in a low-income African country.

Authors:  Patrick Sitati Ngoya; Wilbroad Edward Muhogora; Richard Denys Pitcher
Journal:  Pan Afr Med J       Date:  2016-10-20

5.  Analysis of licensed South African diagnostic imaging equipment.

Authors:  Joseph Mwamba Kabongo; Susan Nel; Richard Denys Pitcher
Journal:  Pan Afr Med J       Date:  2015-09-18
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.