Literature DB >> 23025828

Magnetic field polarity fails to influence the directional signal carried by the head direction cell network and the behavior of rats in a task requiring magnetic field orientation.

Valerie L Tryon1, Esther U Kim, Talal J Zafar, April M Unruh, Shelly R Staley, Jeffrey L Calton.   

Abstract

Many different species of animals including mole rats, pigeons, and sea turtles are thought to use the magnetic field of the earth for navigational guidance. While laboratory rats are commonly used for navigational research, and brain networks have been described in these animals that presumably mediate accurate spatial navigation, little has been done to determine the role of the geomagnetic field in these brain networks and in the navigational behavior of these animals. In Experiment 1, anterior thalamic head direction (HD) cells were recorded in female Long-Evans rats while they foraged in an environment subjected to an experimentally generated magnetic field of earth-strength intensity, the polarity of which could be shifted from one session to another. Despite previous work that has shown that the preferred direction of HD cells can be controlled by the position of familiar landmarks in a recording environment, the directional signal of HD cells was not influenced by the polarity of the magnetic field in the enclosure. Because this finding could be attributed to the animal being insensitive or inattentive to the magnetic field, in Experiment 2, rats were trained in a choice maze task dependent on the ability of the animals to sense the polarity of the experimentally controlled magnetic field. Over the course of 28 days of training, performance failed to improve to a level above chance, providing evidence that the spatial behavior of laboratory rats (and the associated HD network) is insensitive to the polarity of the geomagnetic field.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23025828     DOI: 10.1037/a0030248

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Neurosci        ISSN: 0735-7044            Impact factor:   1.912


  3 in total

Review 1.  Our sense of direction: progress, controversies and challenges.

Authors:  Kathleen E Cullen; Jeffrey S Taube
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2017-10-26       Impact factor: 24.884

2.  Rapid learning of magnetic compass direction by C57BL/6 mice in a 4-armed 'plus' water maze.

Authors:  John B Phillips; Paul W Youmans; Rachel Muheim; Kelly A Sloan; Lukas Landler; Michael S Painter; Christopher R Anderson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-08-30       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Head direction cells in a migratory bird prefer north.

Authors:  Susumu Takahashi; Takumi Hombe; Sakiko Matsumoto; Kaoru Ide; Ken Yoda
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2022-02-04       Impact factor: 14.136

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.