Literature DB >> 2302543

Effects of speech rate on the absolute and relative timing of apraxic and conduction aphasic sentence production.

M R McNeil1, J M Liss, C H Tseng, R D Kent.   

Abstract

The purpose of this investigation was to provide a constructive replication of the Kent and McNeil (1987, In Phonetic approaches to speech production in aphasia and related disorders. San Diego: College-Hill Press) study of the speech timing characteristics of apraxic and conduction aphasic speakers. Acoustic analysis was used to obtain absolute utterance durations, segment durations, and vowel formant trajectories from utterances produced under control, fast, and slow rate conditions. Segment-to-whole ratios and slope values were calculated. Results support the hypothesis presented by Kent and McNeil (1987) that there is a phonetic-motoric component contributing to the speech patterns of both the apraxic and conduction aphasic speakers sampled. Theories of rate control in normal and disordered speakers are discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2302543     DOI: 10.1016/0093-934x(90)90106-q

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Lang        ISSN: 0093-934X            Impact factor:   2.381


  9 in total

1.  A Multivariate Analytic Approach to the Differential Diagnosis of Apraxia of Speech.

Authors:  Alexandra Basilakos; Grigori Yourganov; Dirk-Bart den Ouden; Daniel Fogerty; Chris Rorden; Lynda Feenaughty; Julius Fridriksson
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2017-12-20       Impact factor: 2.297

2.  Feedforward and feedback control in apraxia of speech: effects of noise masking on vowel production.

Authors:  Edwin Maas; Marja-Liisa Mailend; Frank H Guenther
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 2.297

3.  Convex weighting criteria for speaking rate estimation.

Authors:  Yishan Jiao; Visar Berisha; Ming Tu; Julie Liss
Journal:  IEEE/ACM Trans Audio Speech Lang Process       Date:  2015-09

4.  Speech entrainment enables patients with Broca's aphasia to produce fluent speech.

Authors:  Julius Fridriksson; H Isabel Hubbard; Sarah Grace Hudspeth; Audrey L Holland; Leonardo Bonilha; Davida Fromm; Chris Rorden
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 13.501

5.  Clinical Progression in Four Cases of Primary Progressive Apraxia of Speech.

Authors:  Rene L Utianski; Joseph R Duffy; Heather M Clark; Edythe A Strand; Sarah M Boland; Mary M Machulda; Jennifer L Whitwell; Keith A Josephs
Journal:  Am J Speech Lang Pathol       Date:  2018-11-21       Impact factor: 2.408

6.  Auditory Masking Effects on Speech Fluency in Apraxia of Speech and Aphasia: Comparison to Altered Auditory Feedback.

Authors:  Adam Jacks; Katarina L Haley
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 2.297

7.  The Nature of Error Consistency in Individuals With Acquired Apraxia of Speech and Aphasia.

Authors:  Lauren Bislick; Malcolm McNeil; Kristie A Spencer; Kathryn Yorkston; Diane L Kendall
Journal:  Am J Speech Lang Pathol       Date:  2017-06-22       Impact factor: 2.408

8.  To Lump or to Split? Possible Subtypes of Apraxia of Speech.

Authors:  Marja-Liisa Mailend; Edwin Maas
Journal:  Aphasiology       Date:  2020-10-23       Impact factor: 2.773

Review 9.  Update on neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder.

Authors:  Kathryn B Holroyd; Giovanna S Manzano; Michael Levy
Journal:  Curr Opin Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-11       Impact factor: 4.299

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.