Literature DB >> 23024451

Comparison of isolation and expansion techniques for equine osteogenic progenitor cells from periosteal tissue.

Laurie A McDuffee1.   

Abstract

Stem cell therapy and cell-based therapies using other progenitor cells are becoming the treatment of choice for many equine orthopedic lesions. Important criteria for obtaining autogenous equine progenitor cells in vitro for use in clinical cell-based therapy include the ability to isolate and expand cells repeatedly to high numbers (millions) required for therapy, in a clinically relevant time frame. Cells must also maintain their ability to differentiate into the tissue type of choice. The objective of this study was to compare isolation and expansion techniques for preparation of periosteal-derived osteogenic progenitor cells for use in commercial autogenous cell-based therapy. Cells were allowed to migrate spontaneously from periosteal tissue or were enzymatically released. Isolated cells were expanded using enzymatic detachment of cells and subsequent monolayer or dynamic culture techniques. Viable osteogenic progenitor cells from each group were counted at 2 weeks, and osteogenic potential determined. Cells isolated or expanded using the explant or bioreactor technique yielded cells at a much lower number per gram of tissue compared with that of enzyme digestion and monolayer expansion, but all cells were able to differentiate into the ostoblast phenotype. Osteogenic progenitor cells isolated by enzymatic release and expanded using monolayer culture reached the highest number of viable cells per gram of donor periosteal tissue while maintaining the ability to differentiate into bone forming cells in vitro. This technique would be an easy, consistent method of preparation of equine osteogenic cells for clinical cell based therapy for orthopedic conditions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23024451      PMCID: PMC3314441     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can J Vet Res        ISSN: 0830-9000            Impact factor:   1.310


  40 in total

Review 1.  Skeletal tissue engineering: opportunities and challenges.

Authors:  F P Luyten; F Dell'Accio; C De Bari
Journal:  Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 4.098

2.  Isolation, proliferation and differentiation of osteoblastic cells to study cell/biomaterial interactions: comparison of different isolation techniques and source.

Authors:  Heidi Declercq; Natasja Van den Vreken; Erna De Maeyer; Ronald Verbeeck; Etienne Schacht; Leo De Ridder; Maria Cornelissen
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 12.479

Review 3.  Periosteal cells in bone tissue engineering.

Authors:  Dietmar W Hutmacher; Michael Sittinger
Journal:  Tissue Eng       Date:  2003

4.  Bone tissue engineering by primary osteoblast-like cells in a monolayer system and 3-dimensional collagen gel.

Authors:  Hans Peter Wiesmann; Noorul Nazer; Christina Klatt; Thomas Szuwart; Ulrich Meyer
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 1.895

5.  Mineralized matrix deposition by marrow stromal osteoblasts in 3D perfusion culture increases with increasing fluid shear forces.

Authors:  Vassilios I Sikavitsas; Gregory N Bancroft; Heidi L Holtorf; John A Jansen; Antonios G Mikos
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-12-01       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 6.  Engineering principles of clinical cell-based tissue engineering.

Authors:  George F Muschler; Chizu Nakamoto; Linda G Griffith
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 5.284

7.  Bioreactor-based bone tissue engineering: the influence of dynamic flow on osteoblast phenotypic expression and matrix mineralization.

Authors:  Xiaojun Yu; Edward A Botchwey; Elliot M Levine; Solomon R Pollack; Cato T Laurencin
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-07-26       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Collagen microcarrier spinner culture promotes osteoblast proliferation and synthesis of matrix proteins.

Authors:  Michael Overstreet; Afshin Sohrabi; Anna Polotsky; David S Hungerford; Carmelita G Frondoza
Journal:  In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Anim       Date:  2003 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.416

9.  Growth and differentiation of permanent and secondary mouse myogenic cell lines on microcarriers.

Authors:  C Bardouille; J Lehmann; P Heimann; H Jockusch
Journal:  Appl Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 4.813

Review 10.  Mesenchymal stem cells and tissue engineering for orthopaedic surgery.

Authors:  J Gao; A I Caplan
Journal:  Chir Organi Mov       Date:  2003 Jul-Sep
View more
  1 in total

1.  Comparing the chondrogenic potential of rabbit mesenchymal stem cells derived from the infrapatellar fat pad, periosteum & bone marrow.

Authors:  Karthikeyan Rajagopal; Vrisha Madhuri
Journal:  Indian J Med Res       Date:  2021-05       Impact factor: 5.274

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.