Literature DB >> 23024102

Oral chloral hydrate vs. intranasal midazolam for sedation during computerized tomography.

Razieh Fallah1, Mohammad Hosein Ataee Nakhaei, Shekofah Behdad, Reza Nafisi Moghaddam, Ali Shamszadeh.   

Abstract

We conducted this single blind randomized clinical trial to compare the efficacy and safety of oral chloral hydrate and intranasal midazolam for induction of sedation for computerized tomography scan of brain in children. Participants aged 1-10 years (n=60) were randomized to receive 100 mg/kg chloral hydrate orally with intra nasal normal saline OR intranasal midazolam 0.2 mg/kg with oral normal saline. Adequate sedation (Ramsay sedation score of four) was obtained and CT scan completed successfully in 76.7% of chloral hydrate group and in 40% of midazolam group (P=0.004). No significant difference was seen for side effects frequency between the two drugs (10% in chloral hydrate, 3.3% in midazolam group; P=0.34). We conclude that oral chloral hydrate can be considered as a safe and effective drug for sedation in children undergoing CT scan of brain.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23024102     DOI: 10.1007/s13312-013-0065-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Indian Pediatr        ISSN: 0019-6061            Impact factor:   1.411


  12 in total

Review 1.  Options and Considerations for Procedural Sedation in Pediatric Imaging.

Authors:  John W Berkenbosch
Journal:  Paediatr Drugs       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 3.022

2.  Chloral hydrate, chloral hydrate--promethazine and chloral hydrate -hydroxyzine efficacy in electroencephalography sedation.

Authors:  Razieh Fallah; Ali Alaei; Sedighah Akhavan Karbasi; Ahmad Shajari
Journal:  Indian J Pediatr       Date:  2014-01-21       Impact factor: 1.967

Review 3.  Chloral hydrate as a sedating agent for neurodiagnostic procedures in children.

Authors:  Choong Yi Fong; Chee Geap Tay; Lai Choo Ong; Nai Ming Lai
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-11-03

Review 4.  Chloral hydrate as a sedating agent for neurodiagnostic procedures in children.

Authors:  Choong Yi Fong; Wei Kang Lim; Limin Li; Nai Ming Lai
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2021-08-16

Review 5.  Non-Intravenous Sedatives and Analgesics for Procedural Sedation for Imaging Procedures in Pediatric Patients.

Authors:  Amber Thomas; Jamie L Miller; Kevin Couloures; Peter N Johnson
Journal:  J Pediatr Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2015 Nov-Dec

6.  Safety and efficacy of chloral hydrate for conscious sedation of infants in the pediatric cardiovascular intensive care unit.

Authors:  Mei-Lian Chen; Qiang Chen; Fan Xu; Jia-Xin Zhang; Xiao-Ying Su; Xiao-Zhen Tu
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 1.889

Review 7.  Non-Parenteral Medications for Procedural Sedation in Children- A Narrative: Review Article.

Authors:  Razieh Fallah; Farzad Ferdosian; Ahmad Shajari
Journal:  Iran J Child Neurol       Date:  2015

8.  Efficacy of chloral hydrate-hydroxyzine and chloral hydrate-midazolam in pediatric magnetic resonance imaging sedation.

Authors:  Razieh Fallah; Nafiseh Fadavi; Shekofah Behdad; Mahmoud Fallah Tafti
Journal:  Iran J Child Neurol       Date:  2014

9.  Comparison of Oral Midazolam and Promethazine with Oral Midazolam alone for Sedating Children during Computed Tomography.

Authors:  Hassan Barzegari; Behzad Zohrevandi; Kambiz Masoumi; Arash Forouzan; Ali Asgari Darian; Shaqayeq Khosravi
Journal:  Emerg (Tehran)       Date:  2015

10.  Oral Midazolam-Ketamine versus Midazolam alone for Procedural Sedation of Children Undergoing Computed Tomography; a Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Saeed Majidinejad; Keramat Taherian; Mehrdad Esmailian; Mehdi Khazaei; Vajihe Samaie
Journal:  Emerg (Tehran)       Date:  2015
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.