Literature DB >> 23023928

Studying and polishing the PDB's macromolecules.

Jane S Richardson1, David C Richardson.   

Abstract

Macromolecular crystal structures are among the best of scientific data, providing detailed insight into these complex and biologically important molecules with a relatively low level of error and subjectivity. However, there are two notable problems with getting the most information from them. The first is that the models are not perfect: there is still opportunity for improving them, and users need to evaluate whether the local reliability in a structure is up to answering their question of interest. The second is that protein and nucleic acid molecules are highly complex and individual, inherently handed and three-dimensional, and the cooperative and subtle interactions that govern their detailed structure and function are not intuitively evident. Thus there is a real need for graphical representations and descriptive classifications that enable molecular 3D literacy. We have spent our career working to understand these elegant molecules ourselves, and building tools to help us and others determine and understand them better. The Protein Data Bank (PDB) has of course been vital and central to this undertaking. Here we combine some history of our involvement as depositors, illustrators, evaluators, and end-users of PDB structures with commentary on how best to study and draw scientific inferences from them.
Copyright © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23023928      PMCID: PMC3535681          DOI: 10.1002/bip.22108

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biopolymers        ISSN: 0006-3525            Impact factor:   2.505


  68 in total

1.  Early ribbon drawings of proteins.

Authors:  J S Richardson
Journal:  Nat Struct Biol       Date:  2000-08

2.  Natural beta-sheet proteins use negative design to avoid edge-to-edge aggregation.

Authors:  Jane S Richardson; David C Richardson
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-03-05       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Structure validation by Calpha geometry: phi,psi and Cbeta deviation.

Authors:  Simon C Lovell; Ian W Davis; W Bryan Arendall; Paul I W de Bakker; J Michael Word; Michael G Prisant; Jane S Richardson; David C Richardson
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2003-02-15

4.  RNA backbone is rotameric.

Authors:  Laura J W Murray; W Bryan Arendall; David C Richardson; Jane S Richardson
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-11-11       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 5.  beta-Sheet topology and the relatedness of proteins.

Authors:  J S Richardson
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1977-08-11       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 6.  The anatomy and taxonomy of protein structure.

Authors:  J S Richardson
Journal:  Adv Protein Chem       Date:  1981

7.  Determination and analysis of the 2 A-structure of copper, zinc superoxide dismutase.

Authors:  J A Tainer; E D Getzoff; K M Beem; J S Richardson; D C Richardson
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1982-09-15       Impact factor: 5.469

8.  The beta bulge: a common small unit of nonrepetitive protein structure.

Authors:  J S Richardson; E D Getzoff; D C Richardson
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1978-06       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  A new generation of crystallographic validation tools for the protein data bank.

Authors:  Randy J Read; Paul D Adams; W Bryan Arendall; Axel T Brunger; Paul Emsley; Robbie P Joosten; Gerard J Kleywegt; Eugene B Krissinel; Thomas Lütteke; Zbyszek Otwinowski; Anastassis Perrakis; Jane S Richardson; William H Sheffler; Janet L Smith; Ian J Tickle; Gert Vriend; Peter H Zwart
Journal:  Structure       Date:  2011-10-12       Impact factor: 5.006

10.  Outcome of the first electron microscopy validation task force meeting.

Authors:  Richard Henderson; Andrej Sali; Matthew L Baker; Bridget Carragher; Batsal Devkota; Kenneth H Downing; Edward H Egelman; Zukang Feng; Joachim Frank; Nikolaus Grigorieff; Wen Jiang; Steven J Ludtke; Ohad Medalia; Pawel A Penczek; Peter B Rosenthal; Michael G Rossmann; Michael F Schmid; Gunnar F Schröder; Alasdair C Steven; David L Stokes; John D Westbrook; Willy Wriggers; Huanwang Yang; Jasmine Young; Helen M Berman; Wah Chiu; Gerard J Kleywegt; Catherine L Lawson
Journal:  Structure       Date:  2012-02-08       Impact factor: 5.006

View more
  5 in total

1.  Design of structurally distinct proteins using strategies inspired by evolution.

Authors:  T M Jacobs; B Williams; T Williams; X Xu; A Eletsky; J F Federizon; T Szyperski; B Kuhlman
Journal:  Science       Date:  2016-05-06       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Doing molecular biophysics: finding, naming, and picturing signal within complexity.

Authors:  Jane S Richardson; David C Richardson
Journal:  Annu Rev Biophys       Date:  2013-02-28       Impact factor: 12.981

3.  Statistical potentials from the Gaussian scaling behaviour of chain fragments buried within protein globules.

Authors:  Stefano Zamuner; Flavio Seno; Antonio Trovato
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-01-27       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  The good, the bad and the dubious: VHELIBS, a validation helper for ligands and binding sites.

Authors:  Adrià Cereto-Massagué; María José Ojeda; Robbie P Joosten; Cristina Valls; Miquel Mulero; M Josepa Salvado; Anna Arola-Arnal; Lluís Arola; Santiago Garcia-Vallvé; Gerard Pujadas
Journal:  J Cheminform       Date:  2013-07-29       Impact factor: 5.514

5.  A rotamer library to enable modeling and design of peptoid foldamers.

Authors:  P Douglas Renfrew; Timothy W Craven; Glenn L Butterfoss; Kent Kirshenbaum; Richard Bonneau
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2014-06-09       Impact factor: 15.419

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.