Literature DB >> 23023767

On the choice of doses for phase III clinical trials.

Vera Lisovskaja1, Carl-Fredrik Burman.   

Abstract

Many potential new medicines fail in phase III clinical trials, because of either insufficient efficacy or intolerability. Such failures may be caused by the absence of an effect and also if a suboptimal dose is being tested. It is thus important to consider how to optimise the choice of dose or doses that continue into the confirmatory phase. For many indications, it is common to test one single active dose in phase III. However, phase IIB dose-finding trials are relatively small and often lack the ability of precisely estimating the dose-response curves for efficacy and tolerability. Because of this uncertainty in dose response, it is reasonable to consider bringing more than one dose into phase III. Using simple but illustrative models, we find the optimal doses and compare the probability of success, for fixed total sample sizes, when one or two active doses are included in phase III.
Copyright © 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23023767     DOI: 10.1002/sim.5632

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stat Med        ISSN: 0277-6715            Impact factor:   2.373


  2 in total

1.  Dose Titration Algorithm Tuning (DTAT) should supersede 'the' Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD) in oncology dose-finding trials.

Authors:  David C Norris
Journal:  F1000Res       Date:  2017-02-07

2.  Dose Finding in the Clinical Development of 60 US Food and Drug Administration-Approved Drugs Compared With Learning vs. Confirming Recommendations.

Authors:  Yassine Kamal Lyauk; Daniël Martijn Jonker; Trine Meldgaard Lund
Journal:  Clin Transl Sci       Date:  2019-06-29       Impact factor: 4.689

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.