Literature DB >> 23023762

Different characteristics identified by single nucleotide polymorphism array analysis in leukemia suggest the need for different application strategies depending on disease category.

Jungwon Huh1, Chul Won Jung, Hyeoung-Joon Kim, Yeo-Kyeoung Kim, Joon Ho Moon, Sang Kyun Sohn, Hee-Je Kim, Woo Sung Min, Dong Hwan Dennis Kim.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the detection rate of chromosomal rearrangements in leukemia using single nucleotide polymorphism array (SNP-A) in combination with metaphase cytogenetics (MC), with the aim of proposing a practical approach for clinical karyotyping applications of SNP-A. The Genome-Wide Human SNP Array 6.0 (Affymetrix, Santa Clara, CA) was applied in 469 patients with a variety of hematologic malignancies. Combined use of SNP-A with MC improved the detection rate in comparison with MC alone: acute myeloid leukemia (AML) with normal karyotype (NK), 32% versus 0%; core binding factor (CBF)-AML 40% versus 29%; myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS), 54% versus 39%; chronic myeloid leukemia (CML), 24% versus 3%; and acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), 88% versus 63%. Different patterns of abnormalities (especially the type, size, and location) were noted in the leukemia subtypes. Copy neutral loss of heterozygosity lesions was detected in 23% of AML-NK, 3% of CBF-AML, 25% of MDS, 2% of CML, and 20% of ALL. SNP-A also provided information on cryptic deletions and a variety of aneuploidies in ALL, while the benefit was minimal in CML. In conclusion, different patterns of abnormal lesions were presented according to the disease category, thus requiring a different approach of adopting SNP-A-based karyotyping among different leukemia subtypes.
Copyright © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23023762     DOI: 10.1002/gcc.22005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genes Chromosomes Cancer        ISSN: 1045-2257            Impact factor:   5.006


  6 in total

1.  Array-based comparative genomic hybridization detects copy number variations with prognostic relevance in 80% of ALL with normal karyotype or failed chromosome analysis.

Authors:  V Mühlbacher; T Haferlach; W Kern; M Zenger; S Schnittger; C Haferlach
Journal:  Leukemia       Date:  2015-10-09       Impact factor: 11.528

2.  Clinical relevance of high-resolution single nucleotide polymorphism array in patients with relapsed acute lymphoblastic leukemia with normal karyotype: a report of three cases.

Authors:  Sang Hyuk Park; Seung-Hee Lee; Shine Young Kim; Sun Min Lee; Jongyoun Yi; In-Suk Kim; Hyung Hoi Kim; Chulhun Ludgerus Chang; Eun Yup Lee
Journal:  Ann Lab Med       Date:  2014-12-08       Impact factor: 3.464

3.  Identify latent chromosomal aberrations relevant to myelodysplastic syndromes.

Authors:  Qibin Song; Yuxin Chu; Yi Yao; Min Peng; Weihong Yang; Xiaoqing Li; Shiang Huang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-09-04       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 4.  Use of single nucleotide polymorphism array technology to improve the identification of chromosomal lesions in leukemia.

Authors:  Ilaria Iacobucci; Annalisa Lonetti; Cristina Papayannidis; Giovanni Martinelli
Journal:  Curr Cancer Drug Targets       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 3.428

Review 5.  Techniques for detecting chromosomal aberrations in myelodysplastic syndromes.

Authors:  Qibin Song; Min Peng; Yuxin Chu; Shiang Huang
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2017-05-09

6.  Impact of copy neutral loss of heterozygosity and total genome aberrations on survival in myelodysplastic syndrome.

Authors:  Cecilia C S Yeung; Scott McElhone; Xue Yan Chen; David Ng; Barry E Storer; H Joachim Deeg; Min Fang
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  2017-12-15       Impact factor: 7.842

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.