Literature DB >> 23023199

Commercializing biomedical research through securitization techniques.

Jose-Maria Fernandez1, Roger M Stein, Andrew W Lo.   

Abstract

Biomedical innovation has become riskier, more expensive and more difficult to finance with traditional sources such as private and public equity. Here we propose a financial structure in which a large number of biomedical programs at various stages of development are funded by a single entity to substantially reduce the portfolio's risk. The portfolio entity can finance its activities by issuing debt, a critical advantage because a much larger pool of capital is available for investment in debt versus equity. By employing financial engineering techniques such as securitization, it can raise even greater amounts of more-patient capital. In a simulation using historical data for new molecular entities in oncology from 1990 to 2011, we find that megafunds of $5–15 billion may yield average investment returns of 8.9–11.4% for equity holders and 5–8% for 'research-backed obligation' holders, which are lower than typical venture-capital hurdle rates but attractive to pension funds, insurance companies and other large institutional investors.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23023199     DOI: 10.1038/nbt.2374

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nat Biotechnol        ISSN: 1087-0156            Impact factor:   54.908


  7 in total

1.  The price of innovation: new estimates of drug development costs.

Authors:  Joseph A DiMasi; Ronald W Hansen; Henry G Grabowski
Journal:  J Health Econ       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 3.883

Review 2.  How to improve R&D productivity: the pharmaceutical industry's grand challenge.

Authors:  Steven M Paul; Daniel S Mytelka; Christopher T Dunwiddie; Charles C Persinger; Bernard H Munos; Stacy R Lindborg; Aaron L Schacht
Journal:  Nat Rev Drug Discov       Date:  2010-02-19       Impact factor: 84.694

3.  Estimating the cost of new drug development: is it really 802 million dollars?

Authors:  Christopher P Adams; Van V Brantner
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2006 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 6.301

4.  Biotech's wellspring: a survey of the health of the private sector.

Authors:  Brady Huggett
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2012-05-07       Impact factor: 54.908

Review 5.  Lessons from 60 years of pharmaceutical innovation.

Authors:  Bernard Munos
Journal:  Nat Rev Drug Discov       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 84.694

6.  Pharmaceutical industry financial performance.

Authors:  Michael Goodman
Journal:  Nat Rev Drug Discov       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 84.694

7.  Stelios Papadopoulos.

Authors:  Stelios Papadopoulos
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 54.908

  7 in total
  11 in total

1.  The cancer megafund: determinants of success.

Authors:  Nicholas F Marko
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 54.908

2.  The cancer megafund: a catalyst for disruptive innovation.

Authors:  Jay M Tenenbaum
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 54.908

3.  The cancer megafund: mathematical modeling needed to gauge risk.

Authors:  François-Henri Boissel
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 54.908

Review 4.  The risks of risk aversion in drug regulation.

Authors:  Hans-Georg Eichler; Brigitte Bloechl-Daum; Daniel Brasseur; Alasdair Breckenridge; Hubert Leufkens; June Raine; Tomas Salmonson; Christian K Schneider; Guido Rasi
Journal:  Nat Rev Drug Discov       Date:  2013-11-15       Impact factor: 84.694

5.  Just how good an investment is the biopharmaceutical sector?

Authors:  Richard T Thakor; Nicholas Anaya; Yuwei Zhang; Christian Vilanilam; Kien Wei Siah; Chi Heem Wong; Andrew W Lo
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2017-12-08       Impact factor: 54.908

Review 6.  Alzheimer's disease drug development pipeline: 2017.

Authors:  Jeffrey Cummings; Garam Lee; Travis Mortsdorf; Aaron Ritter; Kate Zhong
Journal:  Alzheimers Dement (N Y)       Date:  2017-05-24

7.  Cancer megafunds with in silico and in vitro validation: accelerating cancer drug discovery via financial engineering without financial crisis.

Authors:  Xianjin Yang; Edouard Debonneuil; Alex Zhavoronkov; Bud Mishra
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2016-09-06

8.  Can Financial Economics Cure Cancer?

Authors:  Andrew W Lo
Journal:  Atl Econ J       Date:  2021-04-01

9.  A Brain Capital Grand Strategy: toward economic reimagination.

Authors:  Erin Smith; Diab Ali; Bill Wilkerson; Walter D Dawson; Kunmi Sobowale; Charles Reynolds; Michael Berk; Helen Lavretsky; Dilip Jeste; Chee H Ng; Jair C Soares; Gowri Aragam; Zoe Wainer; Husseini K Manji; Julio Licinio; Andrew W Lo; Eric Storch; Ernestine Fu; Marion Leboyer; Ioannis Tarnanas; Agustin Ibanez; Facundo Manes; Sarah Caddick; Howard Fillit; Ryan Abbott; Ian H Robertson; Sandra B Chapman; Rhoda Au; Cara M Altimus; William Hynes; Patrick Brannelly; Jeffrey Cummings; Harris A Eyre
Journal:  Mol Psychiatry       Date:  2020-10-26       Impact factor: 15.992

10.  Reimagining Health as a 'Flow on Effect' of Biomedical Innovation: Research Policy as a Site of State Activism.

Authors:  Georgia Miller; Declan Kuch; Matthew Kearnes
Journal:  Minerva       Date:  2022-01-18
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.