Literature DB >> 23023096

RECIST rules.

Aslam Sohaib1.   

Abstract

Response Evaluation Criteria for Solid Tumours (RECIST) were introduced in 2000 to provide a standardized method for assessing response to treatments. The RECIST Working Group has updated RECIST to Version 1.1.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23023096      PMCID: PMC3460554          DOI: 10.1102/1470-7330.2012.9011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Imaging        ISSN: 1470-7330            Impact factor:   3.909


Response Evaluation Criteria for Solid Tumours (RECIST) were introduced in 2000 to provide a standardized method for assessing response to treatments[]. The RECIST Working Group has updated RECIST to Version 1.1[]. The revised version has maintained assessment of tumour burden using the sum of the diameters and continues to use uni-dimensional measurements. The response categories are still complete response, partial response (30% decrease in sum from baseline), stable disease and progressive disease (20% increase in sum from nadir). The revisions address issues that have arisen related to the use of the criteria in clinical practice. Table 1 outlines the main changes.
Table 1
RECIST 1.0RECIST 1.1
Tumour burdenMaximum 10 target lesions in total and up to 5 per organMaximum 5 target lesions in total and up to 2 per organ
Measurable lesions

≥10 mm in longest diameter (LD) for spiral CT (nodal and extranodal lesions)

≥20 mm in LD for non-spiral CT

≥20 mm in LD for clinical lesions

≥20 mm in LD for chest radiograph

Ultrasound (US) may be an alternative to clinical measurement of superficial nodes or nodules

≥10 mm in LD and 2 time the slice thickness for extra-nodal lesions

≥15 mm in short axis diameter (SAD) for nodal lesions

≥10 mm in LD for clinical lesions

≥20 mm in LD for chest radiograph

US cannot be used to measure lesions

Lymph nodesNodal lesions not distinguished from extra-nodal lesions

Lymph nodes are considered abnormal enlarged if SAD >10 mm

Measurable nodal lesions must be ≥15 mm in SAD

Non-measurable nodal lesions SAD >10 mm and <15 mm

The sum of the diameters (LD for extra-nodal target lesions and SAD for nodal lesions) is followed through treatment

Complete response (CR)CR requires disappearance of all lesionsCR requires the disappearance of all extra-nodal lesions and regression of nodal lesions to <10 mm SAD
Progressive disease (PD)

PD occurs if the sum of the longest diameters increases by ≥20% from nadir

PD occurs if there is “unequivocal progression” of existing non-target lesions

PD occurs if the sum of the diameters has increased by ≥20% and ≥5 mm from nadir

Patients with measurable disease for “unequivocal progression” based on non-target disease, there must be an overall substantial worsening that merits discontinuation of therapy (if target disease is SD/PR)

Patients without measurable disease for “unequivocal progression” of non-target disease, the increase in overall tumour burden must be comparable to the increase needed for PD of measurable disease

Confirmation of responseCR and PR require confirmation by a repeat assessment 4 weeks after initial documentationConfirmation of PR/CR is ONLY required for non-randomized trials where response is the primary end point
New lesionNot specifically definedNew lesions should be unequivocal and not attributable to differences in scanning technique or findings which may not be tumour. If a new lesion is equivocal then repeat scans are needed to confirm. Lesions identified in anatomic locations not scanned at baseline are considered new. New lesions on US should be confirmed on CT/magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)
Fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG)-positron emission tomography (PET)No specific recommendations

New lesions can be assessed using FDG/PET

PET negative at baseline and positive at follow-up is PD based on a new lesion

No PET at baseline and positive PET at follow-up is PD if the new lesion is confirmed on CT

No PET at baseline and positive PET at follow-up corresponding to a pre-existing lesion on CT that is not progressing is not PD

Overall responseOverall response table integrates target, non-target and new lesions

One overall response table integrates target, non-target and new lesions

Another table integrates non-target and new lesions for the assessment of subjects without measurable disease

Table modified from: http://www.corelabpartners.com/CoreLabPartners/media/Corelab/RECIST-Guide_122011web.pdf

≥10 mm in longest diameter (LD) for spiral CT (nodal and extranodal lesions) ≥20 mm in LD for non-spiral CT ≥20 mm in LD for clinical lesions ≥20 mm in LD for chest radiograph Ultrasound (US) may be an alternative to clinical measurement of superficial nodes or nodules ≥10 mm in LD and 2 time the slice thickness for extra-nodal lesions ≥15 mm in short axis diameter (SAD) for nodal lesions ≥10 mm in LD for clinical lesions ≥20 mm in LD for chest radiograph US cannot be used to measure lesions Lymph nodes are considered abnormal enlarged if SAD >10 mm Measurable nodal lesions must be ≥15 mm in SAD Non-measurable nodal lesions SAD >10 mm and <15 mm The sum of the diameters (LD for extra-nodal target lesions and SAD for nodal lesions) is followed through treatment PD occurs if the sum of the longest diameters increases by ≥20% from nadir PD occurs if there is “unequivocal progression” of existing non-target lesions PD occurs if the sum of the diameters has increased by ≥20% and ≥5 mm from nadir Patients with measurable disease for “unequivocal progression” based on non-target disease, there must be an overall substantial worsening that merits discontinuation of therapy (if target disease is SD/PR) Patients without measurable disease for “unequivocal progression” of non-target disease, the increase in overall tumour burden must be comparable to the increase needed for PD of measurable disease New lesions can be assessed using FDG/PET PET negative at baseline and positive at follow-up is PD based on a new lesion No PET at baseline and positive PET at follow-up is PD if the new lesion is confirmed on CT No PET at baseline and positive PET at follow-up corresponding to a pre-existing lesion on CT that is not progressing is not PD One overall response table integrates target, non-target and new lesions Another table integrates non-target and new lesions for the assessment of subjects without measurable disease Table modified from: http://www.corelabpartners.com/CoreLabPartners/media/Corelab/RECIST-Guide_122011web.pdf
  2 in total

1.  New guidelines to evaluate the response to treatment in solid tumors. European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer, National Cancer Institute of the United States, National Cancer Institute of Canada.

Authors:  P Therasse; S G Arbuck; E A Eisenhauer; J Wanders; R S Kaplan; L Rubinstein; J Verweij; M Van Glabbeke; A T van Oosterom; M C Christian; S G Gwyther
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2000-02-02       Impact factor: 13.506

2.  New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1).

Authors:  E A Eisenhauer; P Therasse; J Bogaerts; L H Schwartz; D Sargent; R Ford; J Dancey; S Arbuck; S Gwyther; M Mooney; L Rubinstein; L Shankar; L Dodd; R Kaplan; D Lacombe; J Verweij
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 9.162

  2 in total
  12 in total

1.  Efficacy of Aidi Injection () on overexpression of P-glycoprotein induced by vinorelbine and cisplatin regimen in patients with non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Jun-Jie Ma; Hui-Ping Liu
Journal:  Chin J Integr Med       Date:  2016-08-02       Impact factor: 1.978

2.  Efficacy of tyrosine kinase inhibitors in non-small-cell lung cancer patients undergoing dose reduction and those with a low body surface area.

Authors:  Shinya Sato; Koichi Kurishima; Kunihiko Miyazaki; Takahide Kodama; Hiroichi Ishikawa; Katsunori Kagohashi; Tomohiro Tamura; Shinsuke Homma; Hiroaki Satoh; Nobuyuki Hizawa
Journal:  Mol Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-04-16

3.  DNA methylation biomarkers predict progression-free and overall survival of metastatic renal cell cancer (mRCC) treated with antiangiogenic therapies.

Authors:  Inga Peters; Natalia Dubrowinskaja; Mahmoud Abbas; Christoph Seidel; Michael Kogosov; Ralph Scherer; Kai Gebauer; Axel S Merseburger; Markus A Kuczyk; Viktor Grünwald; Jürgen Serth
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-03-14       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Correlation of perfusion MRI and 18F-FDG PET imaging biomarkers for monitoring regorafenib therapy in experimental colon carcinomas with immunohistochemical validation.

Authors:  Ralf S Eschbach; Wolfgang P Fendler; Philipp M Kazmierczak; Marcus Hacker; Axel Rominger; Janette Carlsen; Heidrun Hirner-Eppeneder; Jessica Schuster; Matthias Moser; Lukas Havla; Moritz J Schneider; Michael Ingrisch; Lukas Spaeth; Maximilian F Reiser; Konstantin Nikolaou; Clemens C Cyran
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-02-10       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Neoadjuvant chemotherapy for primary adenocarcinomas of the urinary bladder: a single-site experience.

Authors:  Bin Yu; Jin Zhou; Hongzhou Cai; Ting Xu; Zicheng Xu; Qing Zou; Min Gu
Journal:  BMC Urol       Date:  2015-01-28       Impact factor: 2.264

6.  Potentially functional SNPs (pfSNPs) as novel genomic predictors of 5-FU response in metastatic colorectal cancer patients.

Authors:  Jingbo Wang; Xu Wang; Mingjue Zhao; Su Pin Choo; Sin Jen Ong; Simon Y K Ong; Samuel S Chong; Yik Ying Teo; Caroline G L Lee
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-11-05       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound with VEGFR2-Targeted Microbubbles for Monitoring Regorafenib Therapy Effects in Experimental Colorectal Adenocarcinomas in Rats with DCE-MRI and Immunohistochemical Validation.

Authors:  Ralf Stefan Eschbach; Dirk-Andre Clevert; Heidrun Hirner-Eppeneder; Michael Ingrisch; Matthias Moser; Jessica Schuster; Dina Tadros; Moritz Schneider; Philipp Maximilian Kazmierczak; Maximilian Reiser; Clemens C Cyran
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-01-06       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Regorafenib effects on human colon carcinoma xenografts monitored by dynamic contrast-enhanced computed tomography with immunohistochemical validation.

Authors:  Clemens C Cyran; Philipp M Kazmierczak; Heidrun Hirner; Matthias Moser; Michael Ingrisch; Lukas Havla; Alexandra Michels; Ralf Eschbach; Bettina Schwarz; Maximilian F Reiser; Christiane J Bruns; Konstantin Nikolaou
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-09-30       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Monitoring early response to anti-angiogenic therapy: diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging and volume measurements in colon carcinoma xenografts.

Authors:  Moritz Jörg Schneider; Clemens Christian Cyran; Konstantin Nikolaou; Heidrun Hirner; Maximilian F Reiser; Olaf Dietrich
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-09-15       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Clinicopathological characteristics of patients with HER2-positive breast cancer and the efficacy of trastuzumab in the People's Republic of China.

Authors:  Ping Zhou; Yi-Zhou Jiang; Xin Hu; Wei Sun; Yi-Rong Liu; Fang Liu; Rong-Cheng Luo; Zhi-Ming Shao
Journal:  Onco Targets Ther       Date:  2016-04-18       Impact factor: 4.147

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.