Stefan Meldau1, Matthias Erb, Ian T Baldwin. 1. Department of Molecular Ecology, Max-Planck-Institute for Chemical Ecology, Jena, Germany. smeldau@ice.mpg.de
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The optimal defence hypothesis (ODH) predicts that tissues that contribute most to a plant's fitness and have the highest probability of being attacked will be the parts best defended against biotic threats, including herbivores. In general, young sink tissues and reproductive structures show stronger induced defence responses after attack from pathogens and herbivores and contain higher basal levels of specialized defensive metabolites than other plant parts. However, the underlying physiological mechanisms responsible for these developmentally regulated defence patterns remain unknown. SCOPE: This review summarizes current knowledge about optimal defence patterns in above- and below-ground plant tissues, including information on basal and induced defence metabolite accumulation, defensive structures and their regulation by jasmonic acid (JA). Physiological regulations underlying developmental differences of tissues with contrasting defence patterns are highlighted, with a special focus on the role of classical plant growth hormones, including auxins, cytokinins, gibberellins and brassinosteroids, and their interactions with the JA pathway. By synthesizing recent findings about the dual roles of these growth hormones in plant development and defence responses, this review aims to provide a framework for new discoveries on the molecular basis of patterns predicted by the ODH. CONCLUSIONS: Almost four decades after its formulation, we are just beginning to understand the underlying molecular mechanisms responsible for the patterns of defence allocation predicted by the ODH. A requirement for future advances will be to understand how developmental and defence processes are integrated.
BACKGROUND: The optimal defence hypothesis (ODH) predicts that tissues that contribute most to a plant's fitness and have the highest probability of being attacked will be the parts best defended against biotic threats, including herbivores. In general, young sink tissues and reproductive structures show stronger induced defence responses after attack from pathogens and herbivores and contain higher basal levels of specialized defensive metabolites than other plant parts. However, the underlying physiological mechanisms responsible for these developmentally regulated defence patterns remain unknown. SCOPE: This review summarizes current knowledge about optimal defence patterns in above- and below-ground plant tissues, including information on basal and induced defence metabolite accumulation, defensive structures and their regulation by jasmonic acid (JA). Physiological regulations underlying developmental differences of tissues with contrasting defence patterns are highlighted, with a special focus on the role of classical plant growth hormones, including auxins, cytokinins, gibberellins and brassinosteroids, and their interactions with the JA pathway. By synthesizing recent findings about the dual roles of these growth hormones in plant development and defence responses, this review aims to provide a framework for new discoveries on the molecular basis of patterns predicted by the ODH. CONCLUSIONS: Almost four decades after its formulation, we are just beginning to understand the underlying molecular mechanisms responsible for the patterns of defence allocation predicted by the ODH. A requirement for future advances will be to understand how developmental and defence processes are integrated.
Authors: Dominik K Grosskinsky; Muhammad Naseem; Usama Ramadan Abdelmohsen; Nicole Plickert; Thomas Engelke; Thomas Griebel; Jürgen Zeier; Ondrej Novák; Miroslav Strnad; Hartwig Pfeifhofer; Eric van der Graaff; Uwe Simon; Thomas Roitsch Journal: Plant Physiol Date: 2011-08-03 Impact factor: 8.340
Authors: Sandrine Ruffel; Gabriel Krouk; Daniela Ristova; Dennis Shasha; Kenneth D Birnbaum; Gloria M Coruzzi Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2011-10-24 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Leron Katsir; Anthony L Schilmiller; Paul E Staswick; Sheng Yang He; Gregg A Howe Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2008-05-05 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Yi Wang; Juli Carrillo; Evan Siemann; Gregory S Wheeler; Lin Zhu; Xue Gu; Jianqing Ding Journal: Ann Bot Date: 2013-06-11 Impact factor: 4.357
Authors: Dominik K Großkinsky; Kerstin Edelsbrunner; Hartwig Pfeifhofer; Eric van der Graaff; Thomas Roitsch Journal: Plant Signal Behav Date: 2013-07-01
Authors: Stefano Papazian; Eliezer Khaling; Christelle Bonnet; Steve Lassueur; Philippe Reymond; Thomas Moritz; James D Blande; Benedicte R Albrectsen Journal: Plant Physiol Date: 2016-10-06 Impact factor: 8.340