Literature DB >> 23022245

A review of the anatomical, biomechanical and kinematic findings of posterior cruciate ligament injury with respect to non-operative management.

Sivashankar Chandrasekaran1, David Ma, Jennifer M Scarvell, Kevin R Woods, Paul N Smith.   

Abstract

An understanding of the kinematics of posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) deficiency is important for the diagnosis and management of patients with isolated PCL injury. The kinematics of PCL injury has been analysed through cadaveric and in vivo imaging studies. Cadaveric studies have detailed the anatomy of the PCL. It consists of two functional bundles, anterolateral and posteromedial, which exhibit different tensioning patterns through the arc of knee flexion. Isolated sectioning of the PCL and its related structures in cadaveric specimens has defined its primary and secondary restraining functions. The PCL is the primary restraint to posterior tibia translation above 30° and is a secondary restraint below 30° of knee flexion. Furthermore, sectioning of the PCL produces increased chondral deformation forces in the medial compartment as the knee flexes. However, the drawback of cadaveric studies is that they can not replicate the contribution of surrounding neuromuscular structures to joint stability that occurs in the clinical setting. To address this, there have been in vivo studies that have examined the kinematics of the PCL deficient knee using imaging modalities whilst subjects perform dynamic manoeuvres. These studies demonstrate significant posterior subluxation of the medial tibia as the knee flexes. The results of these experimental studies are in line with clinical consequences of PCL deficiency. In particular, arthroscopic evaluation of subjects with isolated PCL injuries demonstrate an increased incidence of chondral lesions in the medial compartment. Yet despite the altered kinematics with PCL injury only a minority of patients require surgery for persistent instability and the majority of athletes are able to return to sport following a period of non-operative rehabilitation. Specifically, non-operative management centres on a programme of quadriceps strengthening and hamstring inhibition to minimise posterior tibial load. The mechanism behind the neuromuscular adaptation that allows the majority of athletes to return to sport has been investigated but not clearly elucidated. The purpose of this review paper is to draw together the findings of experimental studies on the anatomical and kinematic effects of PCL injury and summarise their relevance with respect to non-operative management and functional outcome in patients with isolated PCL deficiency. Crown
Copyright © 2012. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23022245     DOI: 10.1016/j.knee.2012.09.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Knee        ISSN: 0968-0160            Impact factor:   2.199


  10 in total

1.  Appraising the methodological quality of cadaveric studies: validation of the QUACS scale.

Authors:  J Wilke; F Krause; D Niederer; T Engeroff; F Nürnberger; L Vogt; W Banzer
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2015-04-07       Impact factor: 2.610

2.  Electromyography-Driven Forward Dynamics Simulation to Estimate In Vivo Joint Contact Forces During Normal, Smooth, and Bouncy Gaits.

Authors:  Swithin S Razu; Trent M Guess
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2018-07-01       Impact factor: 2.097

3.  In vivo static and dynamic lengthening measurements of the posterior cruciate ligament at high knee flexion angles.

Authors:  Caecilia Charbonnier; Victoria B Duthon; Sylvain Chagué; Frank C Kolo; Jacques Ménétrey
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2019-12-20       Impact factor: 2.924

Review 4.  Variations in common operations in athletes and non-Athletes.

Authors:  Amit Joshi; Bibek Basukala; Nagmani Singh; Sunil Panta; Rajiv Sharma; Ishor Pradhan
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2022-06-14

Review 5.  Cruciate ligament avulsion fractures: anatomy, biomechanics, injury patterns, and approach to management.

Authors:  Eric A White; Dakshesh B Patel; George R Matcuk; Deborah M Forrester; Ryan B Lundquist; George F Rick Hatch; C Thomas Vangsness; Christopher J Gottsegen
Journal:  Emerg Radiol       Date:  2013-03-23

6.  Multiple Looping Technique for Tibial Fixation in Posterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction of the Knee.

Authors:  Jung Ho Noh; Kyoung Ho Yoon; Sang Jun Song; Young Hak Roh; Jae Woo Lee
Journal:  Arthrosc Tech       Date:  2015-01-12

Review 7.  Isolated posterior cruciate ligament tears: an update of management.

Authors:  Alfonso Vaquero-Picado; E Carlos Rodríguez-Merchán
Journal:  EFORT Open Rev       Date:  2017-04-27

8.  The biomechanical and histological effects of posterior cruciate ligament rupture on the medial tibial plateau.

Authors:  Zhenhan Deng; Yusheng Li; Zhangyuan Lin; Yong Zhu; Ruibo Zhao
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2017-03-23       Impact factor: 2.359

9.  An extended OpenSim knee model for analysis of strains of connective tissues.

Authors:  M Marieswaran; Arnab Sikidar; Anu Goel; Deepak Joshi; Dinesh Kalyanasundaram
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2018-04-17       Impact factor: 2.819

10.  Isolated Partial Femoral Avulsion Fracture of the Posterior Cruciate Ligament in Adults.

Authors:  Liang Liu; Qi Gui; Feng Zhao; Xue-Zhen Shen; Yi-Lun Pei
Journal:  Orthop Surg       Date:  2021-05-06       Impact factor: 2.071

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.