Literature DB >> 23021902

The AO Foundation and Orthopaedic Trauma Association (AO/OTA) scapula fracture classification system: focus on glenoid fossa involvement.

Martin Jaeger1, Simon Lambert, Norbert P Südkamp, James F Kellam, Jan Erik Madsen, Reto Babst, Jonas Andermahr, Wilson Li, Laurent Audigé.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Fractures of the glenoid frequently require surgical treatment. A comprehensive and reliable scapula classification system involving the glenoid fracture patterns is needed to describe the underlying pathology. The AO Scapula Classification Group introduces an appropriate novel system that is presented along with its inter-rater reliability and accuracy.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: An iterative consensus process (involving a series of face-to-face meetings and agreement studies) with an international group of 7 experienced shoulder surgeons was used to specify and evaluate a scapular fracture classification system with a focus on fracture patterns of the glenoid fossa. The last evaluation was conducted on a consecutive collection of 120 scapular fractures documented by both plain radiographs and computed tomography scans including 3-dimensional surface rendering. Inter-rater reliability was analyzed with κ statistics, and accuracy was estimated by latent class modeling.
RESULTS: Of 120 scapular fractures, 46 involved the glenoid (38%), with 38 classified as F1 articular rim fractures. The overall median sensitivity and specificity in identifying these fractures were 95% and 93%, respectively. Surgeons' accuracy in classifying F1 fractures ranged from 86% to 100% (median, 94%). Subsequently, classification of simple F1 fractures resulted in a proportion of 36% of anterior rim fractures, 19% of posterior rim fractures, and 45% of short oblique fractures, with accuracies ranging from 85% to 98%.
CONCLUSION: This new system for scapular glenoid fractures has proved to be sufficiently reliable and accurate when applied by experienced shoulder surgeons. Further validation of the most detailed system, as well as involvement of surgeons with different levels of training in the framework of clinical routine and research, however, should be considered.
Copyright © 2013 Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery Board of Trustees. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23021902     DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2012.08.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg        ISSN: 1058-2746            Impact factor:   3.019


  11 in total

Review 1.  [Arthroscopic fracture treatment of the shoulder joint].

Authors:  C Gerhardt; L J Lehmann
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 1.087

2.  Pathoanatomy and computed tomography classification of glenoid fossa fractures based on ninety patients.

Authors:  Jan Bartoníček; Michal Tuček; Daniel Klika; Antonín Chochola
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2016-03-30       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  Arthroscopic repair of glenoid rim fractures: a ligamentotaxis surgical technique.

Authors:  A Corradini; G Campochiaro; M Gialdini; M Rebuzzi; P Baudi
Journal:  Musculoskelet Surg       Date:  2018-10-20

Review 4.  [Influencing factors and complications in open treatment of acute anterior glenoid rim fractures].

Authors:  Dirk Maier; K Izadpanah; J Bayer; E R Langenmair; P Ogon; N P Südkamp; M Jaeger
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 1.000

5.  How to deal with a glenoid fracture.

Authors:  Lars Henrik Frich; Morten Schultz Larsen
Journal:  EFORT Open Rev       Date:  2017-05-11

6.  Influence of coracoglenoid space on scapular neck fracture stability: biomechanical study.

Authors:  Junfeng Chen; Wei Zhang; Gang Pang; Qingling Meng; Youyu Zhu; Xuefei Deng
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2022-01-04       Impact factor: 2.362

7.  Interobserver reliability of scapula fracture classifications in intra- and extra-articular injury patterns.

Authors:  Jan-Peter Grunz; Jonas Schmalzl; Henner Huflage; Tabea Fieber; Christian Färber; Jonas Knarr; Simon Veldhoen; Martin C Jordan; Fabian Gilbert; Thorsten Alexander Bley; Rainer H Meffert
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2022-03-01       Impact factor: 2.362

8.  Neurovascular Anatomic Locations and Surgical Safe Zones When Approaching the Posterior Glenoid and Scapula: A Quantitative and Qualitative Cadaveric Anatomy Study.

Authors:  Brenton W Douglass; Kaare S Midgaard; Philip C Nolte; Bryant P Elrick; Kira K Tanghe; Alex W Brady; Matthew T Provencher
Journal:  Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil       Date:  2022-05-24

9.  Intra- and interobserver reliability of glenoid fracture classifications by Ideberg, Euler and AO.

Authors:  F Gilbert; L Eden; R Meffert; F Konietschke; J Lotz; L Bauer; W Staab
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2018-03-27       Impact factor: 2.362

10.  3-T T2 mapping magnetic resonance imaging for biochemical assessment of normal and damaged glenoid cartilage: a prospective arthroscopy-controlled study.

Authors:  Felix Wuennemann; Laurent Kintzelé; Alexander Braun; Felix Zeifang; Michael W Maier; Iris Burkholder; Marc-André Weber; Hans-Ulrich Kauczor; Christoph Rehnitz
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-09-01       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.