| Literature DB >> 23021496 |
Robert P Schwartz1, Maxine L Stitzer, Daniel J Feaster, P Todd Korthuis, Anika A H Alvanzo, Theresa M Winhusen, Lillian Donnard, Ned Snead, Lisa R Metsch.
Abstract
Despite high rates of risky behavior among patients, many drug abuse treatment programs do not provide on-site HIV testing. This secondary analysis examined differences in outcome by program modality from a multi-site trial in which 1281 HIV-negative patients in three methadone programs, seven non-methadone outpatient programs, and three residential programs were randomly assigned to: (1) off-site referral for HIV risk reduction counseling and testing; or on-site rapid testing (2) with or (3) without risk reduction counseling. The parent study using generalized estimating equations with site as a cluster variable found significantly higher rates of HIV testing and feedback of results by 1 month post-enrollment for the combined on-site conditions compared to the offsite condition [RR=4.52, 97.5% CI (3.57, 5.72)]. Utilizing the same statistical approach, we found neither significant treatment modality nor significant treatment modality by testing condition interaction effects either for receipt of HIV test results at 1 month or for sexual or drug use HIV-risk behaviors at 6-month follow-up. On-site HIV testing is effective across treatment modalities for achieving high rates of testing and results feedback. All programs should be encouraged to adopt or expand this service.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2012 PMID: 23021496 PMCID: PMC3577980 DOI: 10.1016/j.jsat.2012.08.219
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Subst Abuse Treat ISSN: 0740-5472