Literature DB >> 23021040

Personalized medicine in major depressive disorder -- opportunities and pitfalls.

Diane B Miller1, James P O'Callaghan.   

Abstract

The sequencing of the human genome in the early days of this millennium was greeted with great fanfare as this accomplishment was expected to revolutionize medicine and result in individualized treatments based on the genetic make-up of the patient. The ultimate promise of personalized medicine would be fulfilled with the identification of disease biomarkers that would be widely available for use in diagnosis and treatment. Progress, however, has been slow in providing disease biomarkers or approved diagnostic tests. This is true for major depressive disorder (MDD), despite its prevalence in the general population and the widespread acceptance of its biological basis. Studies using strategies like genome-wide association and candidate gene analyses have identified a number of possible biomarkers of MDD, including serum levels of neurotrophic factors, inflammatory cytokines and HPA axis hormones, but none have proven sufficiently powerful for clinical use. The lack of biologically based tests available for use in identifying patients with MDD is a significant impediment to personalized and more effective treatment, because it means diagnosis continues to be driven by subjective symptoms. While genetic studies of MDD have not yet led to diagnostic and treatment biomarkers, progress in determining the role of the genome in drug metabolism heralds the first effort in personalized prescribing for the antidepressants. The FDA suggested and approved genotyping tests for common variants of drug metabolism genes, such as the cytochrome p450s. By using these tests a physician can select an appropriate antidepressant for a given patient, as differences in clearance, half-life, and peak blood concentrations are controlled by genetic variability in drug metabolism. Personalization in drug choice can be achieved because these tests: (1) identify responders and non-responders; (2) provide alerts to possible adverse drug events; and (3) help optimize dose. Improved ways of diagnosing and prescribing effective treatments for MDD are needed, as the available methods are inadequate and symptom based. In the foreseeable future, further interrogation of the genome may serve as the basis for development of new personalized medicine strategies for diagnosis and treatment of MDD. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23021040      PMCID: PMC4672728          DOI: 10.1016/j.metabol.2012.08.021

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Metabolism        ISSN: 0026-0495            Impact factor:   8.694


  34 in total

Review 1.  Biomarkers and surrogate endpoints: preferred definitions and conceptual framework.

Authors: 
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 6.875

2.  Depression drug disappoints.

Authors:  Heidi Ledford
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2011-11-15       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Managing depression in primary care.

Authors:  Andre Tylee; Roger Jones
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2005-04-09

Review 4.  Report by the ACNP Task Force on response and remission in major depressive disorder.

Authors:  A John Rush; Helena C Kraemer; Harold A Sackeim; Maurizio Fava; Madhukar H Trivedi; Ellen Frank; Philip T Ninan; Michael E Thase; Alan J Gelenberg; David J Kupfer; Darrel A Regier; Jerrold F Rosenbaum; Oakley Ray; Alan F Schatzberg
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2006-06-21       Impact factor: 7.853

Review 5.  Functional biomarkers of depression: diagnosis, treatment, and pathophysiology.

Authors:  Heath D Schmidt; Richard C Shelton; Ronald S Duman
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2011-08-03       Impact factor: 7.853

6.  Pharmacogenetics: call to action.

Authors:  M V Relling; H J Guchelaar; D M Roden; T E Klein
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2011-08-31       Impact factor: 6.875

Review 7.  Is depression an inflammatory disorder?

Authors:  Charles L Raison; Andrew H Miller
Journal:  Curr Psychiatry Rep       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 5.285

8.  A model to incorporate genetic testing (5-HTTLPR) in pharmacological treatment of major depressive disorders.

Authors:  Alessandro Serretti; Paolo Olgiati; Emanuele Bajo; Marco Bigelli; Diana De Ronchi
Journal:  World J Biol Psychiatry       Date:  2011-05-19       Impact factor: 4.132

Review 9.  Pharmacogenomics and antidepressant drugs.

Authors:  Elisabeth B Binder; Florian Holsboer
Journal:  Ann Med       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 4.709

10.  The Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology, Clinician Rating (IDS-C) and Self-Report (IDS-SR), and the Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology, Clinician Rating (QIDS-C) and Self-Report (QIDS-SR) in public sector patients with mood disorders: a psychometric evaluation.

Authors:  M H Trivedi; A J Rush; H M Ibrahim; T J Carmody; M M Biggs; T Suppes; M L Crismon; K Shores-Wilson; M G Toprac; E B Dennehy; B Witte; T M Kashner
Journal:  Psychol Med       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 7.723

View more
  17 in total

Review 1.  Biomarkers in pediatric depression.

Authors:  Uma Rao
Journal:  Depress Anxiety       Date:  2013-08-22       Impact factor: 6.505

2.  Concerns about unintended negative consequences of informing the public about multifactorial risks may be premature for young adult smokers.

Authors:  Erika A Waters; Caroline Kincaid; Annette R Kaufman; Michelle L Stock; Laurel M Peterson; Nicole L Muscanell; Rosanna E Guadagno
Journal:  Br J Health Psychol       Date:  2013-10-01

3.  Prophylactic ketamine alters nucleotide and neurotransmitter metabolism in brain and plasma following stress.

Authors:  Josephine C McGowan; Collin Hill; Alessia Mastrodonato; Christina T LaGamma; Alexander Kitayev; Rebecca A Brachman; Niven R Narain; Michael A Kiebish; Christine A Denny
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2018-03-29       Impact factor: 7.853

4.  Genome-wide linkage on chromosome 10q26 for a dimensional scale of major depression.

Authors:  Emma E M Knowles; Jack W Kent; D Reese McKay; Emma Sprooten; Samuel R Mathias; Joanne E Curran; Melanie A Carless; Marcio A A de Almeida; H H Goring Harald; Tom D Dyer; Rene L Olvera; Peter T Fox; Ravi Duggirala; Laura Almasy; John Blangero; David C Glahn
Journal:  J Affect Disord       Date:  2015-11-17       Impact factor: 4.839

5.  Amygdala response to explicit sad face stimuli at baseline predicts antidepressant treatment response to scopolamine in major depressive disorder.

Authors:  Joanna Szczepanik; Allison C Nugent; Wayne C Drevets; Ashish Khanna; Carlos A Zarate; Maura L Furey
Journal:  Psychiatry Res Neuroimaging       Date:  2016-06-20       Impact factor: 2.376

Review 6.  Agomelatine: an agent against anhedonia and abulia?

Authors:  J Thome; P Foley
Journal:  J Neural Transm (Vienna)       Date:  2013-12-06       Impact factor: 3.575

7.  Hands-on workshops as an effective means of learning advanced technologies including genomics, proteomics and bioinformatics.

Authors:  Nichole Reisdorph; Robert Stearman; Katerina Kechris; Tzu Lip Phang; Richard Reisdorph; Jessica Prenni; David J Erle; Christopher Coldren; Kevin Schey; Alexey Nesvizhskii; Mark Geraci
Journal:  Genomics Proteomics Bioinformatics       Date:  2013-12-06       Impact factor: 7.691

Review 8.  Pharmacogenomics and Global Precision Medicine in the Context of Adverse Drug Reactions: Top 10 Opportunities and Challenges for the Next Decade.

Authors:  Marco Alessandrini; Mamoonah Chaudhry; Tyren M Dodgen; Michael S Pepper
Journal:  OMICS       Date:  2016-09-19

Review 9.  Rodent models of depression: neurotrophic and neuroinflammatory biomarkers.

Authors:  Mikhail Stepanichev; Nikolay N Dygalo; Grigory Grigoryan; Galina T Shishkina; Natalia Gulyaeva
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2014-06-05       Impact factor: 3.411

10.  Association of Periodontitis and Subsequent Depression: A Nationwide Population-Based Study.

Authors:  Chih-Chao Hsu; Yi-Chao Hsu; Hsuan-Ju Chen; Che-Chen Lin; Kuang-Hsi Chang; Chang-Yin Lee; Lee-Won Chong; Chia-Hung Kao
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 1.817

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.