| Literature DB >> 23020785 |
Shibin Yu1, Xianghui Xing, Kai Jiao, Lei Sun, Lei Liu, Meiqing Wang.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Estrogens play an important role in modulating the morphology and function of temporomandibular joints (TMJs), which is suggested to act via estrogen receptors (ERs). The present study was to investigate the expression of aggrecan, collagen type II (Col II), Col X, aromatase, ERα and ERβ in degenerative changes of mandibular condylar cartilage.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2012 PMID: 23020785 PMCID: PMC3522542 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2474-13-190
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Musculoskelet Disord ISSN: 1471-2474 Impact factor: 2.362
Primer sequences for Col II, Col X, aggrecan, ERα, ERβ, aromatase and S18
| Col II | F: 5’-AGAACTGGTGGAGCAGCAAGA-3' | 124 bp | NM_012929 |
| R: 5’-ATCTGGACGTTAGCGGTGTTG-3’ | |||
| Col X | F: 5’- CCATGGTTCACACAACCCCTT -3’ | 129 bp | AJ131848.1 |
| R: 5’- TGGCTGTGGTAAAGCACCTTG -3’ | |||
| Aggrecan | F: 5’-CCCTCACCCCAAGAATCAAGT-3’ | 178 bp | NM_022190 |
| R: 5’- TCATTGGAGCGAAGGTTCTGG-3’ | |||
| ERα | F: 5’-TGCGCAAGTGTTACGAAGTGG-3’ | 108 bp | NM_012689 |
| R: 5’-TTCGGCCTTCCAAGTCATCTC-3’ | |||
| ERβ | F: 5’-AAAAACTCACCGTCGAGCCTT-3’ | 124 bp | NM_012754 |
| R: 5’-GCTGAATACTCATGGCGGTTG-3’ | |||
| Aromatase | F: 5’-TCATCAGCAAGTCCTCGAGCA-3’ | 106 bp | M33986 |
| R: 5’-CCATTCTCGTGCATGCCAAT-3’ | |||
| S18 | F: 5’-CGGCTACCACATCCAAGGAA-3’ | 187 bp | M11188 |
| R: 5’-GCTGGAATTACCGCGGCT-3’ |
Figure 1The histologic morphology (a, b, c, d) and the expression of Col II (e, f, g, h), Col X(i, j, k, l) in the middle and posterior regions of mandibular condylar cartilage. (a, e, i) and (b, f, j) were from 4-wk male and female control subgroups (16-week-old) separately. All layers of condylar cartilage aligned regularly, with good continuity in each layer. (c, g, k) and (d, h, l) were from 4-wk male and female experimental subgroups separately. As shown in (c), thickening changes, especially in hypertrophic layer, were observed. The continuity of hypertrophic layer was interrupted by the degraded area (in the red frame near subchondral bone), in which some nuclei became eosinophilic. As shown in (d), the layers of condylar cartilage were disarranged obviously, with the continuity of hypertrophic layer interrupted. The arrow showed one hypertrophic chondrocytes island surrounded by cells from other layers. The blue ellipse showed one degraded area characterized by pyknotic, homogeneous and eosinophilic lesion with few nuclei. Near subchondral bone, there was another degraded area full of eosinophilic nuclei (in the red frame). Immunoreactivity of Col II and Col X was observed mainly in hypertrophic and mature layers of condylar cartilage. As the arrow in (h) showed, no or weak immunoreactivity was found in degraded or disarranged areas. F=fibrous layer, P=proliferating layer, M=mature layer, H=hypertrophic layer. Scale bar is 100μm in Figure 1a–l, and 25μm in the enlarged red frames of Figure 1c and d.
Distribution of ranked data of the area of OA-like changes as a percentage of total cartilage
| 0 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 6 | 8 | 8 | 6 | 4 |
| 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
| 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Total | 8 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 8 |
The percentages were ranked as follows: 0, 0%; 1, 0%-10%; 2, 10%-20%; 3, >20%.
* P<0.05 vs other groups.
Figure 2Comparison of the gene expression of Col II, aggrecan, ERα, ERβ and aromatase in the mandibular condylar cartilage in different groups (n=3). Error bars represent standard error. Levels of significance were determined using Student’s t-test. * P < 0.05 and ** P < 0.01 indicate significant difference between experimental and age-matched control groups. # P < 0.05 and ## P < 0.01 indicate significant difference between 2-wk and 4-wk experimental subgroups. △△ P < 0.01 indicate significant difference between male and their age and treatment-matched female subgroups.
Figure 3The expression of ERα (a, b, c, d), ERβ (e, f, g, h) and aromatase (i, j, k, l) in the middle and posterior regions of mandibular condylar cartilage. (a, e, i) The expression of ERα, ERβ and aromatase in condylar cartilage from 4-wk male control subgroup. (b, f, j) The expression of ERα, ERβ and aromatase in condylar cartilage from 4-wk female control subgroup. (c, g, k) The expression of ERα, ERβ and aromatase in condylar cartilage from 4-wk male experimental subgroup. (d, h, l) The expression of ERα, ERβ and aromatase in condylar cartilage from 4-wk female experimental subgroup. Immunoreactivity of ERα, ERβ and aromatase was observed in hypertrophic and mature layers of condylar cartilage. As arrows showed, no or weak immunoreactivity was found in degraded or disarranged areas. Scale bar is 100μm in Figure 1a- 1l.