Literature DB >> 23020732

Negative loop electrosurgical cone biopsy finding following a biopsy diagnosis of high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion: frequency and clinical significance.

Benjamin L Witt1, Rachel E Factor, Elke A Jarboe, Lester J Layfield.   

Abstract

CONTEXT: Loop electrosurgical excision procedure (LEEP) is a therapeutic option following biopsy diagnosis of high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (HSIL). Most LEEPs will confirm the HSIL biopsy diagnosis but a number of them will not. Such negative findings suggest the possibility of an incorrect biopsy diagnosis, removal of the lesion by biopsy, or insufficient LEEP sampling.
OBJECTIVE: To determine the frequency of negative LEEP findings following HSIL biopsies and better understand the clinical significance of negative LEEP findings.
DESIGN: The Department of Pathology's records were searched for all patients undergoing LEEP excision who had prior cervical biopsies and subsequent clinical follow-up.
RESULTS: Three hundred seventy-eight women were found who had index biopsies, subsequent LEEPs, and clinical follow-up averaging 25.8 months. Three hundred six women had HSIL on biopsy with 223 (73%) showing HSIL on LEEP. Seventy-three (24%) LEEPs in women with HSIL index biopsy results yielded negative findings or disclosed low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (LSIL). Twenty-nine of 223 patients (13%) with an HSIL result both on biopsies and LEEPs had HSIL on biopsy and/or excisional clinical follow-up. Seven of 73 patients (10%) with positive (HSIL) biopsy results but negative LEEP findings or LSIL had HSIL on biopsy and/or excisional follow-up.
CONCLUSIONS: Twenty-four percent of patients with HSIL on biopsy had negative findings or LSIL on LEEP. There is no statistical difference in development of HSIL after LEEP for those with positive biopsy and positive LEEP results (13%) versus positive biopsy and negative LEEP results (10%). The occurrence of a negative LEEP finding following a positive biopsy finding was frequent (24%) and does not portend a different clinical follow-up from a positive biopsy and positive LEEP result.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23020732     DOI: 10.5858/arpa.2011-0494-OA

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Pathol Lab Med        ISSN: 0003-9985            Impact factor:   5.534


  10 in total

1.  Three-step approach versus see-and-treat approach in patients with cytological abnormalities.

Authors:  Nilgun Guducu; Guliz Sidar; Nuray Bassullu; Ilknur Turkmen; Ilkkan Dunder
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2013-05-22

2.  Negative loop electrosurgical excision procedure (LEEP) following cervical biopsy diagnosis of high grade squamous intraepithelial lesion.

Authors:  Fatima Zahra Aly; Alyaa Irhayyim; Jacquelyn Knapik; Robert Klein
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Pathol       Date:  2021-12-15

3.  High-Grade Cervical Dysplasia After Negative Loop Electrosurgical Excision Procedure.

Authors:  Lindsay M Kuroki; Laura James-Nywening; Ningying Wu; Jingxia Liu; Matthew A Powell; Premal H Thaker; L Stewart Massad
Journal:  J Low Genit Tract Dis       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 1.925

4.  Predictors of Absent High-grade Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia (CIN) in Loop Electrosurgical Excision Procedure Specimens of Patients with Colposcopic Directed Biopsy-Confirmed High-Grade CIN

Authors:  Yenrudee Poomtavorn; Chamnan Tanprasertkul; Araya Sammor; Komsun Suwannarurk; Yuthadej Thaweekul
Journal:  Asian Pac J Cancer Prev       Date:  2019-03-26

5.  Pathologic discrepancies between colposcopy-directed biopsy and loop electrosurgical excision procedure of the uterine cervix in women with cytologic high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions.

Authors:  Se Ik Kim; Se Jeong Kim; Dong Hoon Suh; Kidong Kim; Jae Hong No; Yong Beom Kim
Journal:  J Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2019-08-22       Impact factor: 4.401

6.  Optimizing the Detection of Occult Cervical Cancer: A Prospective Multicentre Study in China.

Authors:  Yanyun Li; Ying-Xin Gong; Qing Wang; Shujun Gao; Hongwei Zhang; Feng Xie; Qing Cong; Limei Chen; Qi Zhou; Zubei Hong; Lihua Qiu; Fang Li; Yu Xie; Long Sui
Journal:  Int J Womens Health       Date:  2021-10-27

7.  The concordance between colposcopic biopsy and loop electrosurgical excision procedures in patients with known smear cytology and human papillomavirus results.

Authors:  Sener Gezer; Sumeyye Kanbay Ozturk; Sibel Balci; Izzet Yucesoy
Journal:  North Clin Istanb       Date:  2021-12-31

8.  Absence of high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia in conization specimens from patients with colposcopic biopsy-confirmed high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: Retrospective study of 1695 cases.

Authors:  Yulin Guo; Ying Wang; Qiuzi Peng; Lu Li; Miao Zou; Chaonan Wang; Xufeng Wu; Quanfu Ma
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-09-14       Impact factor: 5.738

9.  A prospective randomized study on limits of colposcopy and histology: the skill of colposcopist and colposcopy-guided biopsy in diagnosis of cervical intraepithelial lesions.

Authors:  Giuseppe Bifulco; Nicoletta De Rosa; Giada Lavitola; Roberto Piccoli; Alessandra Bertrando; Valentina Natella; Costantino Di Carlo; Luigi Insabato; Carmine Nappi
Journal:  Infect Agent Cancer       Date:  2015-11-19       Impact factor: 2.965

10.  Clinical factors that affect diagnostic discrepancy between colposcopically directed biopsies and loop electrosurgical excision procedure conization of the uterine cervix.

Authors:  Yuyeon Jung; Ah Ra Lee; Sung-Jong Lee; Yong Seok Lee; Dong Choon Park; Eun Kyung Park
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol Sci       Date:  2018-06-28
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.